Literature DB >> 28101439

Development of highly variable microsatellite markers for the tetraploid Silene stellata (Caryophyllaceae).

Juannan Zhou1, Michele R Dudash2, Charles B Fenster3, Elizabeth A Zimmer4.   

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: We designed and tested microsatellite markers for the North American native species Silene stellata (Caryophyllaceae) to investigate its population genetic structure and identify selection on floral design through male reproductive success. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 153 candidate microsatellite loci were isolated based on next-generation sequencing. We identified 18 polymorphic microsatellite loci in three populations of S. stellata, with di- or trinucleotide repeats. Genotyping results showed the number of alleles per locus ranged from six to 45 and expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.511 to 0.951. Five of these loci were successfully amplified in S. virginica and S. caroliniana and were also polymorphic.
CONCLUSIONS: The microsatellite markers reported here provide a valuable tool for paternity analysis in S. stellata. They will also be useful for investigating the population genetic structures of S. stellata and related species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caryophyllaceae; Silene stellata; microsatellites; plant–animal interaction; polyploidy

Year:  2016        PMID: 28101439      PMCID: PMC5238704          DOI: 10.3732/apps.1600117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Plant Sci        ISSN: 2168-0450            Impact factor:   1.936


There are nearly 700 species in the genus Silene L. (Caryophyllaceae). Silene species exhibit diverse pollination specialization as manifested by their floral diversity (Kephart et al., 2006). Approximately one third of all Silene species in the Old and New World exhibit nocturnal pollination syndromes and usually form close interactions with noctuid moths from the genus Hadena (Noctuidae) (Kephart et al., 2006). Silene stellata (L.) W. T. Aiton is an infrequent native perennial herb that is distributed throughout the eastern part of the United States. The flowers are pollinated by Hadena ectypa as well as by a number of generalist nocturnal moths (Reynolds et al., 2009; Kula et al., 2013). In addition to the positive effect of pollination, oviposition by female H. ectypa inside the calyx results in strong negative effects through larval predation on the reproductive tissues of S. stellata (Kula et al., 2013). Depending on the amount of pollination service provided by the generalist moths, the net outcome of the Silene–Hadena interaction can range from mutualism to parasitism (Reynolds et al., 2012), making it a valuable system for understanding the evolutionary dynamics of interspecific interactions (Kephart et al., 2006; Bernasconi et al., 2009). Ecological and evolutionary studies utilizing genetic markers of North American Silene species are relatively few compared with the European species (Moyle, 2006), potentially due to technical complications caused by the prevalent polyploidy: most North American Silene species have been shown to be polyploids, including tetra-, hexa-, and octoploids, with tetraploidy being the most common ploidy level (Popp and Oxelman, 2007). Prior to this study, we tested nine microsatellite markers developed for S. latifolia Poir. (Magalhaes et al., 2011) in 20 individuals of S. stellata and did not identify any polymorphic loci. We report the development of 18 highly variable microsatellite markers for the tetraploid S. stellata. These markers are being used to quantify the population genetic structure of S. stellata. We will also use these markers to assess individual siring abilities through paternity assignment to investigate selection on floral design through the male function of the hermaphroditic S. stellata. We also tested transferability of these markers to two closely related tetraploid Silene species: the specialist hummingbird-pollinated S. virginica L. and the primarily Bombus- and hawk moth–pollinated S. caroliniana Walter (Reynolds et al., 2009).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Genomic DNA was extracted from fresh leaf tissue of a S. stellata individual collected from a natural population near Mountain Lake Biological Station in Giles County, Virginia, USA (37.348296°N, 80.544301°W, elevation ca. 1100–1300 m; Appendix 1), using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, California, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. DNA libraries were prepared using the KAPA Library Preparation Kit version 2.13 (KR0453; Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Libraries were quantified with a Qubit Fluorometric Quantitation instrument (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California, USA) and then sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq version 3 kit (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA) to produce paired-end reads of ≤301 bases. A total of 8,557,438 reads were imported and paired by name in Geneious 7.0.6 (Biomatters, Auckland, New Zealand). A de novo assembly was performed on the first 1,000,000 sequences for which both reads of any pair were ≥200 bases. A total of 99,506 consensus sequences between 200 and 400 bp were extracted and screened for potential microsatellite loci using MSATCOMMANDER 1.0.8 beta (Faircloth, 2008) with default settings. Primers were designed for sequences with perfect di-, tri-, and tetranucleotide repeats in Primer3 software (Rozen and Skaletsky, 1999). We designed primers for 153 out of a total of 946 loci identified as containing microsatellites. One hundred fourteen primer pairs were first tested with seven randomly selected S. stellata samples for amplification success and polymorphism. For each primer pair, we modified the forward primer by attaching a CAG tag (5′-CAGTCGGGCGTCATCA-3′) preceding the 5′ end to enable the cost-efficient fluorescent labeling system of PCR products described by Boutin-Ganache et al. (2001) and Glenn (2001). Ten microliter PCR reactions were performed using the QIAGEN Type-it Microsatellite PCR Kit. Each reaction contained the following components: ∼10 ng of genomic DNA, 5 μL of the 2× Multiplex PCR Master Mix, 0.02 μM of the modified forward primer, 0.2 μM of reverse primer, and 0.2 μM of the fluorescently labeled CATG primer (5′-6FAM, 5′-HEX). A touchdown PCR protocol was used to test all primer pairs: 5 min of denaturing at 95°C; five cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 1.5 min, and 72°C for 30 s; followed by 28 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 1.5 min, and 72°C for 30 s; and a final extension at 60°C for 30 min. Of the 114 primer pairs tested, 50 produced bands consistently on an agarose gel. Amplicons of these primers were analyzed using an ABI Prism 3730 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA), then visualized and scored in Geneious 7.0.6 (Biomatters). Eighteen loci showed clear peak patterns and were polymorphic (Table 1). These 18 polymorphic loci were further characterized using a total of 95 S. stellata individuals collected from three local populations near Mountain Lake Biological Station (Meadow, Woodland, and Windrock) within 8 km of one another. To investigate marker transferability, these 18 loci were also tested on six individuals from one population each of S. virginica from Newport, Virginia, and S. caroliniana from Potomac, Maryland (Appendix 1).
Table 1.

Characteristics of 18 microsatellite loci developed in Silene stellata.

LocusPrimer sequences (5′–3′)Fluorescent dyeRepeat motifAllele size range (bp)Ta (°C)GenBank accession no.
SS1010F: ACACAGCGGATGGTGTCGHEX(AG)26174–24860KX712873
R: CTCTCTTTCAATCCTGGCCC
SS62979F: CTTTGGGTTGTGCTCAGAATAGHEX(AG)8155–23955KX712874
R: TTGTGTCTGCCATCCTTGC
SS63719F: GTACGCGTCGCTTTGTTAACFAM(AT)8135–15458KX712875
R: TGATACTGCTCACCGGATGC
SS64450F: CAAGTGGTATCAGAGCCAGGFAM(AT)9220–25460KX712876
R: ACCTGTAACTTGTTGGGATGC
SS64692F: TGGTACCCTCAAGACTAGGCHEX(AAT)14148–26560KX712877
R: CCTCCCTGAACGCCTCTTC
SS68587F: TCAGGTCATAAGGCTGTGGGHEX(AAC)8191–28155KX712878
R: CTGGGTGGTTGATGAAATTTGG
SS71250F: TAGACGGTTGCGGAATGGGFAM(AG)14125–20358KX712879
R: TTTCTCACAACCTCACGCTC
SS73434F: GAGAAGGGAAGAGACCGGTGFAM(AG)10184–21060KX712880
R: TGACCCGAGACCTACTGATTG
SS78777F: ACGTACAAGTAGCATAGGTGGGHEX(AC)8156–24860KX712881
R: TCGAGGTCATAGTAGGCCAC
SS85007F: CAGGGTCAACATCAACAGGCFAM(AAT)41149–35660KX712882
R: AGATTGTCTCTCGGCTCCC
SS89178F: TCACTACCCACCCTTTACGGFAM(AG)8254–37455KX712883
R: ATCCCTAGATGCCCGCAC
SS100056F: GCATCTTGTGTTCCCGAGCFAM(AAG)3791–20560KX712884
R: GGGCTATCTTGATCTCCACTC
SS115569F: CCCAGCTATCCCAACGAATCHEX(AAC)15377–39955KX712885
R: ACCCAACCCAACGAATCAAAC
SS122722F: ACACAATTGTTTCTGACTTGCGFAM(AAT)15176–28760KX712886
R: ATTGTATCTCGGCTGCCCAC
SS129528F: AGTGACGGATACCATGGAGCHEX(AAG)3196–22660KX712887
R: CATCCAATCCGCCTTTCCTC
SS131968F: ACCCAACATACATCAACCTCTCFAM(AAT)9154–20555KX712888
R: GAGCGGTTGAGAATGGTGTG
SS131990F: TCAGCTACCCACCAATTTCTTGHEX(AT)19186–28255KX712889
R: CCCACCACTTAATACGTACACC
SS141347F: GGGAAGAAATGGAGGTGCTCHEX(ACC)16132–19260KX712890
R: GAGAGATCAGACCGAGGCTG

Note: Ta = annealing temperature.

All values are based on 95 samples representing three populations in Virginia.

Characteristics of 18 microsatellite loci developed in Silene stellata. Note: Ta = annealing temperature. All values are based on 95 samples representing three populations in Virginia. We report the following parameters for the three populations of S. stellata: sample size, number of alleles, number of private alleles, observed heterozygosity, and expected heterozygosity. The parameters were estimated using GenoDive version 2.0b27 (Meirmans and Van Tienderen, 2004) while correcting for unknown dosage of alleles for partial heterozygotes. Across the three populations, the number of alleles ranged from six to 45, and expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.511 to 0.951 (Table 2).
Table 2.

Genetic diversity of the 18 polymorphic microsatellites of Silene stellata.

Total (n = 95)Meadow (n = 55)Windrock (n = 20)Woodland (n = 20)
LocusAHoHeAApHoHeAApHoHeAApHoHe
SS1010310.8470.89428100.8240.9031700.8400.9121920.8860.876
SS62979360.8280.91328120.6640.9251740.8230.9181540.9960.894
SS63719180.4680.8771420.5270.8581220.3640.8911220.5120.885
SS64450150.4860.7121040.3930.626720.4740.724930.5910.782
SS64692380.7070.90629110.6580.9091740.7120.8791940.7370.915
SS68587270.8660.9322550.8830.9311710.8350.9321610.8790.933
SS71250260.9990.9182440.9990.9212110.9890.9121811.0100.922
SS73434130.2100.8751020.3050.890720.1540.842900.1720.889
SS78777340.8920.91933120.9750.9311700.7700.9111710.9330.915
SS85007450.6210.92138170.7160.9221830.5850.9262030.5550.902
SS89178370.8260.8872690.9030.8661950.6770.8661830.9310.951
SS100056350.8210.9513380.7990.9612210.8830.9432110.7810.948
SS11556960.3940.511640.4580.551200.3970.538200.3280.442
SS122722380.7330.9443190.8070.9571840.5470.9161920.8560.959
SS129528350.8960.9372970.8250.9242030.9820.9332320.8830.954
SS131968180.7790.7611730.6990.7301410.7600.7041100.8690.844
SS131990300.4400.9392780.4580.9371500.4070.9431530.4550.937
SS141347170.9930.8911620.9980.8841500.9890.8951410.9900.891

Note: A = number of alleles; Ap = number of private alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; n = number of individuals sampled.

Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1.

Genetic diversity of the 18 polymorphic microsatellites of Silene stellata. Note: A = number of alleles; Ap = number of private alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; n = number of individuals sampled. Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1. Of the 18 loci tested in S. virginica and S. caroliniana, 10 loci were successfully amplified in both species. Genotyping results showed two loci were monomorphic in both species, one locus was polymorphic in S. virginica but monomorphic in S. caroliniana, five loci were polymorphic in both species, and two loci showed multiple bands (Table 3). Vouchers for the Silene species were deposited at the Norton-Brown Herbarium (University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA; Appendix 1).
Table 3.

Genetic diversity of six microsatellite loci developed in Silene stellata in two related native Silene species.

S. virginica (n = 6)S. caroliniana (n = 6)
LocusAllele size range (bp)AHoHeAllele size range (bp)AHoHe
SS64692154–196710.94151–214810.861
SS68587188–19120.50.369161–19150.6670.614
SS71250113–12950.8330.754117–165610.662
SS78777198–254110.8330.969184–2441210.939
SS131968b157–16930.3330.489
SS141347144–18090.50.867147–168710.826

Note: A = number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; n = number of individuals sampled.

Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1.

Locus SS131968 was monomorphic in S. virginica.

Genetic diversity of six microsatellite loci developed in Silene stellata in two related native Silene species. Note: A = number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; n = number of individuals sampled. Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1. Locus SS131968 was monomorphic in S. virginica.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed 18 novel microsatellite loci for S. stellata. These loci showed high variability in S. stellata and therefore are suitable for future paternity analysis. Five of these markers are polymorphic in the related S. virginica and S. caroliniana. These microsatellites will also be useful for studying the population genetics of S. stellata and related North American species in this genus.
Appendix 1.

Geographic location and voucher information of Silene populations used in this study.

SpeciesLocationPopulationGeographic coordinatesVoucher no.a
S. stellata (L.) W. T. AitonbNewport, VA, USAMeadow37.348296°N, 80.544301°WMARY1012978
S. stellataNewport, VA, USAMeadow37.348296°N, 80.544301°WMARY1012979
S. stellataNewport, VA, USAWindrock37.413889°N, 80.519444°WMARY1012974
S. stellataNewport, VA, USAWindrock37.413889°N, 80.519444°WMARY1012975
S. stellataNewport, VA, USAWoodland37.355415°N, 80.553469°WMARY1012977
S. stellataNewport, VA, USAWoodland37.355415°N, 80.553469°WMARY1012978
S. caroliniana WalterPotomac, MD, USAGreat Falls38.989511°N, 77.246713°WMARY1012980
S. carolinianaPotomac, MD, USAGreat Falls38.989511°N, 77.246713°WMARY1012981
S. virginica L.Newport, VA, USAWindrock37.413889°N, 80.519444°WMARY1012982
S. virginicaNewport, VA, USAWindrock37.413889°N, 80.519444°WMARY1012983

Herbarium vouchers were deposited at the University of Maryland Herbarium (MARY).

Individual used for DNA extraction.

  11 in total

1.  Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers.

Authors:  S Rozen; H Skaletsky
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2000

2.  M13-tailed primers improve the readability and usability of microsatellite analyses performed with two different allele-sizing methods.

Authors:  I Boutin-Ganache; M Raposo; M Raymond; C F Deschepper
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.993

3.  Variable nursery pollinator importance and its effect on plant reproductive success.

Authors:  Richard J Reynolds; Abigail A R Kula; Charles B Fenster; Michele R Dudash
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Pollination and seed predation by moths on Silene and allied Caryophyllaceae: evaluating a model system to study the evolution of mutualisms.

Authors:  Susan Kephart; Richard J Reynolds; Matthew T Rutter; Charles B Fenster; Michele R Dudash
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 5.  Silene as a model system in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  G Bernasconi; J Antonovics; A Biere; D Charlesworth; L F Delph; D Filatov; T Giraud; M E Hood; G A B Marais; D McCauley; J R Pannell; J A Shykoff; B Vyskot; L M Wolfe; A Widmer
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Choices and consequences of oviposition by a pollinating seed predator, Hadena ectypa (Noctuidae), on its host plant, Silene stellata (Caryophyllaceae).

Authors:  Abigail A R Kula; Michele R Dudash; Charles B Fenster
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.844

7.  Pollinator specialization and pollination syndromes of three related North American Silene.

Authors:  Richard J Reynolds; M Jody Westbrook; Alexandra S Rohde; Julie M Cridland; Charles B Fenster; Michele R Dudash
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.499

8.  Origin and evolution of North American polyploid Silene (Caryophyllaceae).

Authors:  Magnus Popp; Bengt Oxelman
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.844

9.  Comparative population genetic structure in a plant-pollinator/seed predator system.

Authors:  Isabel S Magalhaes; Gabriela Gleiser; Anne-Marie Labouche; Giorgina Bernasconi
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Correlates of genetic differentiation and isolation by distance in 17 congeneric Silene species.

Authors:  Leonie C Moyle
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of population genetic structures of the plant Silene stellata and its obligate pollinating seed predator moth Hadena ectypa.

Authors:  Juannan Zhou; Michele R Dudash; Elizabeth A Zimmer; Charles B Fenster
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.357

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.