Literature DB >> 28101158

Prevalence of carbapenemases among high-level aminoglycoside-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in a university hospital in China.

Yanhong Wang1, Min Shen1, Jingni Yang1, Min Dai2, Yaowen Chang3, Chi Zhang3, Guangxin Luan1, Baodong Ling3, Xu Jia1.   

Abstract

The prevalence of aminoglycoside resistant enzymes has previously been reported and extended-spectrum β-lactamase among Acinetobacter baumannii. To track the risk of multidrug-resistant A. baumannii, the present study aimed to determine the prevalence of carbapenemases in high-level aminoglycoside resistant A. baumannii over two years. A total of 118 strains of A. baumannii were consecutively collected in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China. These isolates were investigated on the genetic basis of their resistance to aminoglycosides. The results showed that 75 (63.56%) isolates were high-level resistant to aminoglycosides, including gentamicin and amikacin (minimum inhibitory concentration, ≥256 µg/ml). Aminoglycoside-resistant genes ant(2″)-Ia, aac(6')-Ib, aph(3')-Ia, aac(3)-Ia, aac(3)-IIa, armA, rmtA, rmtB, rmtC, rmtD, rmtE, rmtF, rmtG, rmtH and npmA, and carbapenem-resistant genes blaOXA-23, blaOXA-24, blaOXA-51, blaOXA-58, blaSIM, blaIMP, blaNDM-1 and blaKPC, were analyzed using polymerase chain reaction. The positive rate of ant(2″)-Ia, aac(6')-Ib, aph(3')-Ia, aac(3)-Ia and aac(3)-IIa was 66.95, 69.49, 42.37, 39.83 and 14.41%, respectively. armA was present in 72.0% (54/75) of A. baumannii isolates with high-level resistance to aminoglycosides. The remaining nine 16S ribosomal RNA methlyase genes (rmtA, rmtB, rmtC, rmtD, rmtE, rmtF, rmtG, rmtH and npmA) and aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme gene aac(6')-Ib-cr were not detected. Among the 54 armA-positive isolates, the prevalence of the carbapenem resistant blaOXA-23 and blaOXA-51 genes was 79.63 and 100%, respectively. armA, ant(2″)-Ia and aac(6')-Ib were positive in 43 isolates. The results of multilocus sequence typing revealed 31 sequence types (STs) in all clinical strains. Among these STs, the high-level aminoglycoside-resistant A. baumannii ST92, which mostly harbored blaOXA-23, was the predominant clone (29/75). In conclusion, A. baumannii harboring carbapenemases and aminoglycoside-resistant enzymes are extremely prevalent in western China, emphasizing the need to adopt surveillance programs to solve the therapeutic challenges that this presents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S ribosomal RNA methylase; Acinetobacter baumannii; aminoglycosides; carbapenemases; multilocus sequence typing

Year:  2016        PMID: 28101158      PMCID: PMC5228107          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2016.3828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


Introduction

Acinetobacter baumannii is an important opportunistic pathogen that causes various types of human infections and has become a primary cause of nosocomial infections because of its broad antimicrobial resistance (1–3). Aminoglycosides, a type of broad-spectrum antibiotics, continue to serve an important role in treating serious infections caused by gram-negative bacteria (4). However, aminoglycoside resistance of A. baumannii has rapidly increased and given rise to more challenges in the clinical treatment of infections (5). A. baumannii shows resistance to aminoglycosides since functional aminoglycosides can be modified by various aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes, including acetyltransferases, phosphotransferases and nucleotidyltransferases, into non-functional forms in the bacteria (6). In addition, aminoglycoside antibiotics bind specifically to the A-site of 16S ribosomal (r)RNA in the 30S small subunit and interfere with the decoding of mRNA to inhibit protein synthesis (7). In addition, at least ten 16S rRNA methylase genes (armA, rmtA, rmtB, rmtC, rmtD, rmtE, rmtF, rmtG, rmtH and npmA) have been identified (8–12). These 16S rRNA methylases, which lead to the high-level resistance of various aminoglycosides, can easily transfer to other bacteria since their genes are typically present on plasmids (13). Therefore, the emergence and spread of such bacteria should be carefully monitored. Since the 16S rRNA methylases are key factors in the aminoglycoside resistance of A. baumannii, the investigation of the acquisition of 16S rRNA methylase genes by clinical isolates is important for the prevention and treatment of their infections (14). Aminoglycosides and carbapenems represent the class of antimicrobials that are used to treat A. baumannii infections. Aminoglycoside antibiotics are frequently ineffective against strains of A. baumannii; however, combinations of aminoglycosides and carbapenems can produce synergistic effects to treat infected patients (15,16). Previously, it has become evident that the outgrowth of carbapenem-resistant isolates has resulted in it being difficult to treat A. baumannii infections. One of the most important mechanisms underlying the resistance of carbapenems is the production of carbapenemases in A. baumannii (17). Class D oxacillinases (OXA type) are the primary cause of prevalence in A. baumannii strains (18). In addition, causes stem from class B β-lactamases (metallo-β-lactamases) and Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase (KPC) producers. These carbapenemases are a diverse group of β-lactamases that are active against the carbapenems, resulting in their limited clinical use. Several studies have documented the co-existence of blaOXA-23 and armA in multidrug resistant A. baumannii isolates (19–22). For example, Doi et al (19) first discovered that two of five A. baumannii isolates coproduced OXA-23 β-lactamase and ArmA in North America in 2007. In addition, further cases were reported in Korea (20,23), India (24), France (25), Bulgaria (26), Italy (27), Latvia (28), East Africa (29), Yemen (30), Japan (31), Brunei (32), Egypt (33) and China (21,34,35). The authors of the present study previously determined that extended-spectrum β-lactamase and 16S rRNA methylase are coproduced in A. baumannii (36). However, the high-level resistance to aminoglycosides, coupled with carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii, were not reported over the 4-year period in China, particularly in western China. The aim of the present study was to explore the high-level resistance mechanisms against aminoglycosides, and to investigate the presence of carbapenemases among strains of A. baumannii. In addition, the relatedness of aminoglycoside- and carbapenem-resistant strains, determined through epidemiologic examination, is described. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to document the emergence of A. baumannii producing blaOXA-23 and blaOXA-51 carbapenemase-encoding genes among armA 16S rRNA methylases at a university hospital in western China. Furthermore, the results aim to emphasize that the dearth of appropriate treatments remains a primary concern regarding multidrug-resistant infections.

Materials and methods

Clinical isolates

A total of 118 strains of A. baumannii were consecutively collected in a university hospital of western China between February 2012 and July 2013. Rapid species identification was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), as reported within ‘Resistance gene amplification’ and previously described (37). A. baumannii was identified and confirmed if the following two PCR products were yielded: A 425-bp internal control amplicon corresponding to the recA gene of Acinetobacter spp., and a 208-bp fragment of the 16S rRNA intergenic spacer region of A. baumannii (38). Non-baumannii species of Acinetobacter, which yielded the 425-bp product alone, were excluded in this study. Isolates were obtained from specimens including sputum, secretion, lavage fluids, blood and other specimens. All strains were stored at −80°C. Bacteria were grown on tryptose agar or Mueller-Hinton broth. No amplicons were obtained with bacteria belonging to other genera.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of amikacin and gentamicin (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) for A. baumannii were determined on Mueller-Hinton agar plates by agar dilution according to the protocol recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (39). MICs of meropenem and imipenem (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd.) were tested in high-level aminoglycoside-resistant isolates. The results were interpreted according to the CLSI guidelines. Escherichia coli [American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) 25922] and A. baumannii (ATCC 19606) (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were used as quality control strains.

Resistance gene amplification

The aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme genes and the 16S rRNA methylase genes were detected by PCR. Total DNA was extracted by boiling at 95°C for 15 min. After centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 10 min to pellet the debris, the supernatant was stored at −20°C for further assays. PCR was performed in a total volume of 50 µl containing 0.2 mM of each deoxynucleotide, 0.5 µM of each primer (Table I), 2.5 units Taq polymerase (Takara Bio, Inc., Dalian, China) and 5 µl 10X buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Primers listed in Table I were synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd.. The PCR thermal cycling conditions were as follows: Initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min in order to obtain partial activation of Taq polymerase; then, the number of cycles was increased to 30, each consisting of a denaturation step for 30 sec (at 94°C), an annealing step for 30 sec (at 55°C for armA, rmtA, rmtB, rmtC, rmtD, rmtE, rmtF, rmtG, rmtH and npmA, at 53°C for ant(2″)-Ia, aph(3′)-1a, aac( and aac(, and at 56°C for aac(6′)-Ib) and an extension step for 30 sec (at 72°C). Each amplification experiment included a blank containing the reagent except for target DNA. The products were electrophoresed in 1% agarose gels and visualized under ultra-violet light (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). All aac(6′)-Ib PCR products were directly sequenced and compared with the published nucleotide (NC_005327.1).
Table I.

Primers used in the present study for polymerase chain reaction detection.

PrimerTargetOligonucletides (5′ to 3′)Expected size (bp)
armA forwardarmAAGGTTGTTTCCATTTCTGAG591
armA-RTCTCTTCCATTCCCTTCTCC
rmtA forwardrmtACTAGCGTCCATCCTTTCCTC635
rmtA-RTTTGCTTCCATGCCCTTGCC
rmtB forwardrmtB-CCCAAACAGACCGTAGAGGC585
rmtB-RCTCAAACTCGGCGGGCAAGC
rmtC forwardrmtCCGAAGAAGTAACAGCCAAAG711
rmtC-RATCCCAACATCTCTCCCACT
rmtD forwardrmtDCGGCACGCGATTGGGAAGC401
rmtD-RCGGAAACGATGCGACGAT
rmtE forwardrmtEATGAATATTGATGAAATGGTTGC823
rmtE-RTGATTGATTTCCTCCGTTTTTG
rmtF forwardrmtFGCGATACAGAAAACCGAAGG589
rmtF-RACCAGTCGGCATAGTGCTTT
rmtG forwardrmtGAAATACCGCGATGTGTGTCC250
rmtG reverseACACGGCATCTGTTTCTTCC
rmtH forwardrmtHGCTTAAACCCGCTGATGCT332
rmtH reverseAAACCAGGTGGCGTAGTGC
npmA forwardnpmAGGAGGGCTATCTAATGTGGT371
npmA reverseGCCCAAAGAGAATTAAACTG
ant(2″)-Ia forwardant(2″)-IaGCTTACGTTGTCCCGCATTT215
ant(2″)-Ia reverseCCTTGGTGATCTCGCCTTTC
aph(3′)-Ia forwardaph(3′)-IaCGAGCATCAAATGAAACTGC623
aph(3′)-Ia reverseGCGTTGCCAATGATGTTACAG
aac(3)-Ia forwardaac(3)-IaGACATAAGCCTGTTCGGTT372
aac(3)-Ia reverseCTCCGAACTCACGACCGA
aac(3)-IIa forwardaac(3)-IIaATGCATACGCGGAAGGC822
aac(3)-IIa reverseTGCTGGCACGATCGGAG
aac(6′)-Ib forwardaac(6′)-IbAAGCGTTTTAGCGCAAGAGT366
aac(6′)-Ib reverseGCGTGTTTGAACCATGTACA
OXA-23 forwardOXA-23GATCGGATTGGAGAACCAGA501
OXA-23 reverseATTTCTGACCGCATTTCCAT
OXA-24 forwardOXA-24CAAGAGCTTGCAAGACGGACT420
OXA-24 reverseTCCAAGATTTTCTAGCRACTTATA
OXA-51 forwardOXA-51TAATGCTTTGATCGGCCTTG353
OXA-51 reverseTGGATTGCACTTCATCTTGG
OXA-58 forwardOXA-58TCGATCAGAATGTTCAAGCGC530
OXA-58 reverseACGATTCTCCCCTCTGCGC
NDM-1 forwardNDM-1TCTCGACATGCCGGGTTTCGG475
NDM-1 reverseACCGAGATTGCCGAGCGACTT
KPC forwardKPCGCTCAGGCGCAACTGTAAGT823
KPC reverseGTCCAGACGGAACGTGGTAT
IMP forwardIMPCTACCGCAGAGTCTTTG587
IMP reverseAACCAGTTTTGCCTTACCAT
SIM forwardSIMTACAAGGGATTCGGCATCG570
SIM reverseTAATGGCCTGTTCCCATGTG
Genes coding for classes A, B and D carbapenemases were investigated among high-level aminoglycoside-resistant isolates by PCR. The genes encoding class A, such as Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase gene (blaKPC) (40), class B, such as the metallo-β-lactamase genes [blaIMP (41), blaVIM-1 (42), blaSIM (43) and blaNDM-1 (44)] and class D, such as CHDLs [blaOXA-23 (45), blaOXA-24 (45), blaOXA-51 (46) and blaOXA-58 (47)], were also analyzed using PCR. Reaction conditions of PCR were as follows: 94°C for 5 min; and 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 56°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 30 sec; followed by a final extension at 72°C for 5 min.

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST)

MLST was performed according a the previously described A. baumannii MLST study (48). Briefly, internal fragments of seven housekeeping genes (gltA, gyrB, gdhB, recA, cpn60, gpi and rpoD) were amplified by PCR (49). The sequences of the seven housekeeping genes were compared with existing sequences in the MLST database (50) for the assignment of allelic numbers. Sequence types (STs) were assigned according to their allelic profiles. New allele sequences and STs were assigned in accordance with the PubMLST database (50). The eBURST program (http://eburst.mlst.net) was used to cluster STs into clonal complex (CC) and infer evolutionary descent (51).

Results

Antimicrobial susceptibility of aminoglycosides

All 118 clinical strains were identified as A. baumannii by 16S rRNA and recA amplification. Among these isolates, 73 (61.86%) and 72 (61.02%) strains were resistant to gentamicin and amikacin, respectively (Tables II and III). Thus, the resistance to amikacin and gentamicin was observed in 66 (55.93%, 66/118) A. baumannii isolates. A total of 78 (66.1%, 78/118) isolates were resistant to amikacin and gentamicin, and 75 (96.15%, 75/78) of the strains showed a high level of resistance (MIC, ≥256 µg/ml; Table III).
Table II.

Susceptibilities to two types of aminoglycosides of A. baumannii isolates.

Drug nameResistant isolates, n (%)Intermediate isolates, n (%)Sensitive isolates, n (%)Total, n (%)
Gentamicin73 (61.86)3 (2.54)42 (35.60)118 (100)
Amikacin72 (61.02)0 (0.00)46 (38.98)118 (100)
Table III.

Molecular resistance characteristics of 75 high level aminoglycoside resistance isolates.

Susceptibility patter (MIC in µg/ml)Resistance genes


IsolatesGentamicinAmikacinImipenemMeropenemarmAant(2″)-Iaaac(6′)-Ibaph(3′)-Iaaac(3)-Iaaac(3)-IIablaOXA-23blaOXA-51
001>10241024163211110011
0032561024163211110011
005>10241024326411110011
006>10241024326401110011
007>10241024326411111011
008>10241024326411101001
011>10241024163211110011
01325625681611111011
016>10241024163201110011
01825625681610101011
020225681611110001
026>10241024163211010011
027>10241024163211101011
0281024102481611101001
030>10241024323200101001
031>10241024321601011001
034>10241024326411111011
035>10244326411101001
036>10241024163211000011
037>10241024326411101011
039>10241024326411111001
040>10241024323211111001
041>10241024326411101011
042>1024512326411110011
043>10241024326411111011
044>102410246412811101011
046>10241024326411000011
047>10241024646410100111
048>10241024326401110101
049>1024512326401110011
050>1024512323211101111
051>10241024323211100111
052>102410246412810100111
053>1024512323201111111
054>1024512323211101011
057>10241024326401111011
058>10241024326410101011
059>1024512323211101011
060>10241024323211101011
061>10241024163210100011
062>1024512323210101011
063>10241024323201101011
0645128323211101011
0652568321611110011
066>1024512326411111011
067256256163211110011
068>1024512323211110011
069>1024512323211111011
072256256161611101011
074512216801100011
07581024323201010011
076>1024>1024646411010011
079512512326401000111
0805125126412801100111
082512512323201100011
085>1024512163211111101
087512512323211100101
0894512163211111101
090>10241024323211110101
093>102410243212801111001
094>1024>1024163211111101
095512512163211010111
096>1024>1024323211111011
097>1024>1024163211111011
098512512163200100111
099512256323200111110
10085120.5100001001
101>1024512323201110011
102512256323211100011
104512256323211111011
1061024512323201110111
107512256163211100011
109>102451281611100011
113>1024102480.500000001
120>1024283211100011

MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration.

Co-occurrence of aminoglycoside-resistant enzymes and carbapenemases

To determine the role of the aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes in resistance and the 16S rRNA methylases, PCR was performed to detect the concomitant genes (Table III). The positive rates of ant(2″)-Ia, aac(6′)-Ib, aph(3′)-Ia, aac( and aac( were 66.95 (79/118), 69.49 (82/118), 42.37 (50/118), 39.83 (47/118) and 14.41% (17/118), respectively (Table IV). Fifty-four of 118 (45.76%) isolates harboring the 16S rRNA methyalse armA gene obtained high level of resistance to amikacin and gentamicin. rmtA, rmtB, rmtC, rmtD, rmtE, rmtF, rmtG and npmA genes were not detected in all of the isolates.
Table IV.

Positive rates of genes in A. baumannii.

GenePositive rate, % (n/118)GenePositive rate, % (n/118)
armA45.76 (54/118)aph(3′)-Ia42.37 (50/118)
aac(6′)-Ib69.45 (82/118)aac(3)-Ia39.83 (47/118)
ant(2″)-la66.95 (79/118)aac(3)-IIa14.41 (17/118)
There was a marked difference in the distribution of aminoglycoside-resistant genes among the 75 high-level aminoglycoside-resistant A. baumannii (Tables III and IV). All 54 (72.0%, 54/75) armA-positive strains were confirmed to serve a primary role in high level aminoglycoside resistance. However, 21 (28%, 21/75) isolates harboring aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes without the armA gene served the same function (Table V).
Table V.

Distribution of aminoglycoside resistance genes in 75 high level aminoglycoside resistance clinical isolates of A. baumannii, expressed as positive (+) or negative (−).

armA-positive aminoglycoside resistance gene profile (n=54)blaOXA-23 (n=58)blaOXA-51 (n=75)No. of isolates
ant(2″)-Ia+2+2 (2.67%)
aac(6)-Ib+1+1 (1.33%)
ant(2)-Ia+aac(6′)-Ib+4+4 (5.33%)
ant(2)-Ia+aph(3′)-Ia+2+2 (2.67%)
aac(6′)-Ib+aac(3)-Ia+3+3 (4.0%)
aac(6′)-Ib+aac(3)-IIa+2+2 (2.67%)
ant(2″)-Ia+aac(6′)-Ib+aac(3)-Ia  +9/−3+12 (16%)
ant(2″)-Ia+aac(6′)-Ib+aac(3)-IIa+1/−1+2 (2.67%)
ant(2″)-Ia+aac(6′)-Ib+aph(3′)-Ia+9/−1+10 (13.3%)
ant(2″)-Ia+aph(3′)-Ia+aac(3)-IIa+1+1 (1.33%)
ant(2″)-Ia+aac(6′)-Ib+aph(3′)-Ia+aac(3)-Ia+8/−2+10 (13.3%)
ant(2″)-Ia+aac(6′)-Ib+aph(3′)-Ia+aac(3)-IIa−1+1 (1.33%)
ant(2″)-Ia+aac(6′)-Ib+aac(3)-Ia+aac(3)-IIa+1+1 (1.33%)
ant(2″)-Ia+aac(6′)-Ib+aph(3′)-Ia+aac(3)-Ia+aac(3)-IIa−3+3 (4.0%)
None of armA genes (21)
ant(2″)-Ia++1 (1.33%)
aac(6′)-Ib+1 (1.33%)
aac(6′)-Ib+ant(2″)-Ia++1 (1.33%)
aac(6′)-Ib+aac(3)-Ia−2+2 (2.67%)
aac(6′)-Ib+aac(3)-IIa++1 (1.33%)
ant(2″)-Ia+aac(6′)-Ib+aph(3′)-Ia+5+5 (6.67%)
ant(2″)-Ia+aac(6′)-Ib+aac(3)-Ia++1 (1.33%)
ant(2″)-Ia+aac(6′)-Ib+aac(3)-IIa+2+2 (2.67%)
ant(2″)-Ia+aph(3′)-Ia+aac(3)-IIa+1 (1.33%)
ant(2″)-Ia+aac(6′)-Ib+aph(3′)-Ia+aac(3)-Ia+/−2+3 (4.0%)
ant(2″)-Ia+aac(6′)-Ib+aph(3′)-Ia+aac(3)-IIa++1 (1.33%)
aac(6′)-Ib+aph(3′)-Ia+aac(3)-Ia+aac(3)-IIa++1 (1.33%)
ant(2″)-Ia+aac(6′)-Ib+aph(3′)-Ia+aac(3)-Ia+aac(3)-IIa++1 (1.33%)
Among the 54 isolates that were armA-positive, the prevalence of blaOXA-23 and blaOXA-51 gene occurrences were 79.63 (43/54) and 100% (54/54), respectively. In addition, the prevalence of ant(2″)-Ia, aac(6′)-Ib, aph(3′)-Ia, aac(, and aac( positive rates of genes was distributed in the aminoglycoside-resistant and-susceptible strains (Table V). As described above, the present study demonstrated that aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes were mostly responsible for moderate level resistance (16 µg/mlaminoglycosides in A. baumannii, whereas armA was responsible for high-level resistance to aminoglycosides. All 75 isolates with high-level resistance to aminoglycosides harbored the carbapenemase genes blaOXA-23 (77.33%) or blaOXA-51 (100%; Tables III and V), which (except one isolate) showed resistance to the carbapenems, imipenem and meropenem. These data suggest that the resistance to carbapenems and aminoglysides poses a threat following combination treatment of A. baumannii infection.

Molecular genotyping analysis of drug-resistant isolates

To better assess the A. baumannii clinical population epidemiology and the genetic background of these strains, a number of molecular typing systems were applied. By comparing the ST(s) of 75 high-level aminoglycoside resistant isolates with all identified ST(s) in A. baumannii in the MLST database by eBUSRT analysis, 29 strains were identified that belonged to ST92, which is a globally distributed strain (Fig. 1A). According to MLST analysis, a total of 31 different STs were assigned to the 75 high-level aminoglycoside resistant isolates, of which 21 STs were clustered into clonal complex 92 (CC92), and the remaining 10 STs were identified as singletons. The most common ST was ST92, which accounted for 38.67% (29/75) (Fig. 1A and B). ST195, followed by ST92, presented in 5 strains, whilst ST136 and ST843 were detected in 4 strains. ST75, ST829, ST837, ST899, ST909 and ST916 were represented by 2 isolates. Molecular analysis revealed that 37 (containing 6 different STs) of the 43 isolates, which produced carbapenemase OXA-23 and 16S rRNA methylase ArmA, were grouped into CC92, while the remaining 6 isolates, which had 6 different STs, could not be clustered into any known clonal complex (Fig. 1C). These data indicate that the prevalence of A. baumannii isolates was caused by CC92 dissemination.
Figure 1.

Relatedness of the STs of 75 high-level aminoglycoside resistance strains. Each circle represents a specific ST. The size of each circle corresponds to number of isolates, with larger sizes representing higher frequency of occurrence. The blue dot in the center corresponds to ST92, the most prevalent. Black numbers indicate existence of STs in the MLST database, and the numbers in purple indicate STs found in the present study. (A) eBURST population snapshot of CC92. Six was used as the minimum identical loci for the definition of CC and three was used as the minimum single locus variants. (B) Similar population snapshot pictures and superscript pictures. Similar population snapshot pictures were drawn by eBURST algorithm of Acinetobacter baumannii STs in the PubMLST database, and superscript pictures were analyzed through the University of Oxford database. (C) The relatedness of the STs of 43 A. baumannii strains carrying blaOXA-23 and armA genes. The radial diagram reflects the predicted evolutionary descent from the founder ST. The size of the circle corresponds to the number of isolates belonging to a ST. STs, sequence types; CC, clonal complex.

Discussion

A. baumannii are important hospital-acquired pathogens that cause various types of human infections (52). The present study demonstrated that 75 (63.56%) strains were high-level resistant to amikacin or gentamicin, determined by susceptibility testing (Table III), suggesting that these antibiotics can only be used for treating A. baumannii infections induced by susceptible strains. As indicated above, at least one aminoglycoside resistance gene was detected in aminoglycoside-resistant A. baumannii strains, and different resistant genes were commonly present in the same isolates (Tables III and V). Among these strains, the dominant aminoglycoside-resistant genotypes are ant(2″)-Ia, armA and aac(6′)-Ib, which were present at 66.95, 45.76 and 69.49%, respectively (Table IV). These results indicated that the presence of armA and aminoglycoside-modifying enzmyes confers to the high level of aminoglycoside resistance. The prevalence of armA genes in A. baumannii isolates has been described in several studies that showed 50% (52/104) in strains isolated in Lishui, eastern China (10), 60.4% (61/101) in clinical strains in Vietnam (53), and 59.54% (103/173) in hospitals in Beijing, China (54). In the present study, 45.76% (54/118, Table IV) of isolates harbored the armA gene, which is similar to the above cases reported in China. In addition, it was reported that armA was identified in 90% (97/107) of the multidrug-resistant strains in Shanghai, eastern China (55). In a previous study, however, 4 (8.5%) isolates were positive for the methylase enzyme ArmA in an Algerian hospital (56). In conclusion, armA is highly prevalent worldwide, particularly in China. The emergence of high level aminoglycoside resistance may pose a question for the combination therapy of aminoglycoside with β-lactams, particularly carbapenems in treating A. baumannii infections. Previously, A. baumannii producing OXA-23 have been increasingly described in Shanghai, eastern China (38). Thus, the present study identified carbapenemase genes in 75 high-level aminoglycoside resistance strains. The positive ratios of blaOXA-51 and blaOXA-23 were 100 (75/75) and 77.33% (58/75), respectively (Table III), further demonstrating that the intrinsic OXA-51 family and the presence of OXA-23 are the most prevalent mechanisms for carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii (57). In addition, among 54 armA-positive isolates, the prevalence of blaOXA-23 and blaOXA-51 were 79.63 (43/54) and 100% (54/54) (Table V), which was similar to a previous study (27,56). Three hospital disseminations of A. baumannii co-producing OXA-23 and ArmA were reported in eastern China in 2009 and 2011 (21,34,35). To the best of our knowledge, the results in the present study are the first to demonstrate the co-occurrence of carbapenemases OXA-23, OXA-51 and 16S rRNA methylase ArmA with high level aminoglycoside resistance among clinical isolates of A. baumannii from Chengdu, western China. Previously, it was reported that aminoglycosides with the aac/aad riboswitch control the expression of aminoglycoside modification enzymes (58), indicating that bacteria can survive in an energy saving way. Therefore, these efficient modification enzymes were responsible for aminoglycoside resistance (Table IV). In addition, it was identified that the aac(6′)-Ib enzyme is able to modify amikacin, even in phenotypically amikacin-susceptible isolates (59). Furthermore, the aac(6′)-Ib (69.49%) A. baumannii isolates were aminoglycoside-positive (Table IV), which is different from previous studies (10). The reason why these differences were observed may be due to the resistance level caused by aac(6′)-Ib, which was regional-dependent and host bacterium-dependent (59). In the present study, a higher rate of aac( (14.41%) were detected. In addition, aac( genes were detected in 47.88% of E. coli isolated from an Iranian hospital (60). Miro et al (61) found 12.4% of strains possessing aac( genes. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the aac( gene distribution in A. baumannii. It was reported that only 4 strains (3.7%) carried aac( genes (62); aac( was not identified in any strains in a study by Nowak et al (63). Previous studies have reported that aac( modifies gentamicin, which explains the observed high rate of resistance to gentamicin in these A. baumannii strains (59). The increasing prevalence of aminoglycoside resistance is partly associated with the presence of aac(3′)-IIa. The PubMLST database assigned A. baumannii strains to 920 different types. ST92, a globally distributed type, was the predicted founder of CC92 in the A. baumannii MLST database. CC92 is the largest and most geographically diverse clonal complex (64). Combined ST profiles from MLST and eBURST analyses showed that almost all isolates were clonally related and CC92 was responsible for the spread of disease (Fig. 1). The present study further suggests the possibility that A. baumannii carrying blaOXA-23 and armA genes contribute towards CC92 dissemination. In addition, the present study described the emergence and spread of a clonal strain of the high-level aminoglycoside-resistant A. baumannii. These findings support the hypothesis that certain restricted genetic backgrounds serve an important role in the emergence of aminoglycoside resistance, since some genetic backgrounds may be prone to acquire a foreign resistance gene and maintain its stability and expression (46). Further analysis of the epidemiology of A. baumannii is required in order to determine the prevalence of drug-resistant genes. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that 16S rRNA methylase ArmA and modifying enzyme occurrence confer high level resistance to aminoglycoside in A. baumannii. In addition, it was identified that the high level aminoglycoside resistance of A. baumannii strains, harboring high percentages of positive carbapenemases blaOXA-23 and blaOXA-51, strongly suggest that a better understanding of the global epidemiology and monitoring for the presence of resistance genes is urgently required.
  59 in total

1.  Emergence and spread of a multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clone producing both the carbapenemase OXA-23 and the 16S rRNA methylase ArmA.

Authors:  Gioconda Brigante; Roberta Migliavacca; Simone Bramati; Eleonora Motta; Elisabetta Nucleo; Monica Manenti; Guglielmo Migliorino; Laura Pagani; Francesco Luzzaro; Franco Egidio Viganò
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.472

2.  High prevalence of bla(NDM-1) carbapenemase-encoding gene and 16S rRNA armA methyltransferase gene among Acinetobacter baumannii clinical Isolates in Egypt.

Authors:  Mohamed Abd El-Gawad El-Sayed-Ahmed; Magdy Ali Amin; Wael Mustafa Tawakol; Lotfi Loucif; Sofiane Bakour; Jean-Marc Rolain
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Comparative in vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities of nosocomial isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii and synergistic activities of nine antimicrobial combinations.

Authors:  M B Marques; E S Brookings; S A Moser; P B Sonke; K B Waites
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Diversity of aminoglycoside-resistance genes and their association with class 1 integrons among strains of pan-European Acinetobacter baumannii clones.

Authors:  Alexandr Nemec; Lucilla Dolzani; Sylvain Brisse; Peterhans van den Broek; Lenie Dijkshoorn
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  Acinetobacter baumannii multidrug-resistant strain occurrence in liver recipients with reference to other high-risk groups.

Authors:  I Netsvyetayeva; M Sikora; M Golas; E Swoboda-Kopec; S Walter de Walthoffen; O Dembicka; M Fraczek; A Mlynarczyk; M Pacholczyk; A Chmura; G Mlynarczyk
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  Novel plasmid-mediated 16S rRNA m1A1408 methyltransferase, NpmA, found in a clinically isolated Escherichia coli strain resistant to structurally diverse aminoglycosides.

Authors:  Jun-ichi Wachino; Keigo Shibayama; Hiroshi Kurokawa; Kouji Kimura; Kunikazu Yamane; Satowa Suzuki; Naohiro Shibata; Yasuyoshi Ike; Yoshichika Arakawa
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Dissemination of 16S rRNA methylase ArmA-producing acinetobacter baumannii and emergence of OXA-72 carbapenemase coproducers in Japan.

Authors:  Tatsuya Tada; Tohru Miyoshi-Akiyama; Kayo Shimada; Masahiro Shimojima; Teruo Kirikae
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  The population structure of Acinetobacter baumannii: expanding multiresistant clones from an ancestral susceptible genetic pool.

Authors:  Laure Diancourt; Virginie Passet; Alexandr Nemec; Lenie Dijkshoorn; Sylvain Brisse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Frequency distribution of genes encoding aminoglycoside modifying enzymes in uropathogenic E. coli isolated from Iranian hospital.

Authors:  Neda Soleimani; Mahdi Aganj; Liaqat Ali; Leili Shokoohizadeh; Türkân Sakinc
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-11-25

10.  Genetic basis of high level aminoglycoside resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii from Beijing, China.

Authors:  Lu Nie; Yuemeng Lv; Min Yuan; Xinxin Hu; Tongying Nie; Xinyi Yang; Guoqing Li; Jing Pang; Jingpu Zhang; Congran Li; Xiukun Wang; Xuefu You
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 11.413

View more
  6 in total

1.  Resistance traits and molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from an intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital in Guangdong, southern China.

Authors:  Zhuo-Ran Chen; Hui-Wu Guo; Jun Liu; Qing Pan; Mao-Zhang Fu; Ying-Kun Qiu; Nai-Kei Wong; Yuan-Chun Huang
Journal:  Int Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.097

2.  A Single Amino Acid Substitution in Elongation Factor G Can Confer Low-Level Gentamicin Resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Concerta L Holley; Vijaya Dhulipala; Jacqueline T Balthazar; Adriana Le Van; Afrin A Begum; Shao-Chun Chen; Timothy D Read; Mitch Matoga; Irving F Hoffman; Daniel Golparian; Magnus Unemo; Ann E Jerse; William M Shafer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 5.938

Review 3.  Research Updates of Plasmid-Mediated Aminoglycoside Resistance 16S rRNA Methyltransferase.

Authors:  Weiwei Yang; Fupin Hu
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-07

4.  Molecular survey of aminoglycoside-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from tertiary hospitals in Qazvin, Iran.

Authors:  P Rashvand; A Peymani; M Mohammadi; A A Karami; R Samimi; S Hajian; D Porasgari; N Habibollah-Pourzereshki
Journal:  New Microbes New Infect       Date:  2021-04-23

5.  Distribution of virulence-associated genes and antimicrobial susceptibility in clinical Acinetobacter baumannii isolates.

Authors:  Chao Liu; Yaowen Chang; Ying Xu; Yun Luo; Linrong Wu; Zhanjun Mei; Shigang Li; Rui Wang; Xu Jia
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-04-24

6.  Emergence and transmission of New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-5-producing Escherichia coli Sequence Type 361 in a Tertiary Hospital in South Korea.

Authors:  Yumi Park; Qute Choi; Gye Cheol Kwon; Sun Hoe Koo
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.352

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.