| Literature DB >> 28101119 |
Daniel Mirosław Grochowski1, Roman Paduch2, Adrian Wiater3, Adrianna Dudek4, Małgorzata Pleszczyńska3, Monika Tomczykowa5, Sebastian Granica6, Paulina Polak3, Michał Tomczyk1.
Abstract
The present study was performed to evaluate the effect of different extracts and subfractions from Rubus caesius leaves on two human colon cancer cell lines obtained from two stages of the disease progression lines HT29 and SW948. Tested samples inhibited the viability of cells, both HT29 and SW948 lines, in a concentration-dependent manner. The most active was the ethyl acetate fraction which, applied at the highest concentration (250 μg/mL), decreased the viability of cells (HT29 and SW948) below 66%. The extracts and subfractions were also investigated for antioxidant activities on DPPH and FRAP assays. All extracts, with the exception of water extract at a dose of 250 μg/mL, almost totally reduced DPPH. The highest Fe3+ ion reduction was shown for the diethyl and ethyl acetate fractions. It was more than 6.5 times higher (at a dose 250 μg/mL) as compared to the control. The LC-MS studies of the analysed preparations showed that all samples contain a wide variety of polyphenolics, among which ellagitannins turned out to be the main constituents with dominant ellagic acid, sanguiin H-6, and flavonol derivatives.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28101119 PMCID: PMC5215490 DOI: 10.1155/2016/5698685
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1UHPLC chromatograms of R. caesius samples (RC1–RC6) recorded at 254 nm.
MS and UV-Vis data of compounds detected in extracts and fractions prepared from leaves of R. caesius.
| Number | Compound name | Retention time [min] | UV [nm] | [M − H]− | MS2 ions | MS3 ions | [M + H]+ | MS2 ions | MS3 ions | NL detected [amu] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | Gallic acids | 3.3 | 265 | 169 | 125b | — | 171 |
|
| — |
| (2) | Unknown phenolic acid | 3.4 | 229, 314 | 183 | 139b | — | 185 | — | — | — |
| (3) | Unknown compound | 7.2 | 214, 260, 292 | 363 | 329, 325, 278, 153b | — | 365 | 333b, 289, 269 | — | — |
| (4) | Unknown ellagitannin | 10.2 | 260 | 391a/783 | 481, 301b, 377, 311 | — | 802c | 785, 767, 483, 465, 303, 277b | — | — |
| (5) | Methyl gallates | 13.9 | 271 | 183 | 125b | — | 185 | 153b | — | — |
| (6) | Galloyl-HHDP-glucose isomer | 15.6 | 260 | 633 |
| 301b, 275 | 652c | 482, 465b, 447, 321, 303, 277 | — | 152 |
| (7) | Unknown ellagitannin | 16.3 | 263 | 391a/783 | 481, 301b, 377, 311 | — | 802c | 785, 767, 483, 465, 303, 277b | — | — |
| (8) | Galloyl-HHDP-glucose isomer | 16.8 | 261 | 633 |
| 301b, 275 | 652c | 482, 465b, 447, 321, 303, 277 | — | 152 |
| (9) | Unknown phenolic acid | 18.3 | 237, 301sh, 321 | 179 | 135b | — | 181 | — | — | — |
| (10) | Unknown ellagitannin | 23.4 | 260 | 459 | — | — | 461 | — | — | — |
| (11) |
| 27.2 | 247, 300sh, 325 | 325 | 314, 163b, 259 | — | 355 | 233, 161b, 135 | — | — |
| (12) | Methyl brevifolincarboxylates | 29.9 | 211, 277, 356 | 305 | 273b, 245 | — | 307 | 293, 275, 247b, 219 | — | — |
| (13) | Unknown compound | 30.2 | 217, 252, 274, 337 | 330 | 327, 287b, 269, 214 | — | 332 | 314, 289b, 227 | — | — |
| (14) | Unknown ellagitannin | 32.2 | 261 | 783a/1567 | 1265, 1103, 933, 633, 301b | — | 1591b | — | — | — |
| (15) | Unknown phenolic acid | 32.5 | 218, 310 | 279 | 272, 190, 163b | — | 281 | 147b | — | — |
| (16) | Ellagic acid derivative | 33.7 | 250, 358 | 331 | 287b | — | 333 | 315, 289b, 272 | — | — |
| (17) | Unknown ellagitannin | 34.1 | 262 | 783a/1567 | 1265, 1103, 933, 633, 301b | — | — | — | — | — |
| (18) | Quercetin rhamnoglucuronidet | 34.4 | 255, 263sh, 351 | 623 | 321, 301b | — | 625 |
| 303b | 146 |
| (19) | Quercetin pentosoglucuronidet | 35.1 | 256, 264sh, 351 | 609 | 429, 301b, 285 | — | 611 |
| 461, 303b | 132 |
| (20) | Sanguniin H-2t | 35.5 | 263 | 551a/1103 | 935, 633, 541, 469, 301, 169 | — | — | — | — | — |
| (21) | Ellagic acid pentoside | 36.3 | 251, 354 | 433 | 387, | 257b | 435 | 417, 303b, 219 | 285b | 162 |
| (22) | Ellagic acids | 37.0 | 250, 353 | 301 | 273, 257b, 245, 187 | — | 303 | 295, 285b, 257, 207, 147 | — | — |
| (23) | Sanguniin H-6t | 37.4 | 260 | 934a/1870 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| (24) | Unknown compound | 37.5 | 255, 350 | 431 | 269b | — | 433 | 271b, 174 | — | — |
| (25) | Kaempferol rhamnoglucuronidet | 38.1 | 265, 347 | 607 | 321, 285b, 257 | — | 609 |
| 447, 287b | 146 |
| (26) | Quercetin 3- | 38.8 | 255, 263sh, 351 | 477 | 431, | 273, 257, 179b, 151 | 479 | 303b | — | 176 |
| (27) | Kaempferol pentosoglucuronidet | 39.3 | 265, 343 | 593 | 307, 285b | — | 595 | 549, 465b, 353, 287 | 445, 329, 287b | 132 |
| (28) | Unknown compound | 40.1 | 251, 324 | 309 | 277, 179, 161b | — | 311 | — | — | — |
| (29) | Unknown ellagitannin | 42.3 | 260 | 558a/1117 | 935, 633b, 483, 459, 301 | — | ||||
| (30) | Kaempferol 3- | 43.1 | 263, 341 | 461 | 415, 285b, 257, 175 | 267, 257b, 241, 229 | 463 | 445, 371, | 258, 241b, 213, 173, 121 | 176 |
| (31) | Unknown phenolic acid | 45.8 | 230sh, 294sh, 328 | 359 | 249, 223, 197, 179, 161b | — | 361 | 163b | — | — |
| (32) | Unknown phenolic acid | 47.0 | 235, 298sh, 325 | 503 | 485, | 323, 281, 271b, 221, 179 | 504 | — | — | 162 |
| (33) | Tilirosides | 58.5 | 266, 295sh, 315, 353sh | 593 |
| 327, 285b, 255 | 595 | 329, 309b, 287, 235, 217, 165 | — | 146 |
| (34) | Quercetin derivative | 59.9 | 255, 265sh, 353 | 533 | 515, 357, 301b | — | 535 | 303b, 215 | — | — |
| (35) | Kaempferol derivative | 63.3 | 263, 343 | 663 | 645, 499, 399, 285b | — | 665 |
| 287b, 159 | 146 |
a[M − 2H]2−, b[M + Na]+, c[M + H2O]+, ttentative assignment, scomparisons with chemical standard have been made, b: base peak (the most abundant ion in recorded spectrum), and in bold: ions subjected to MS3 fragmentation.
Figure 2The effect of Rubus caesius extracts influence on HT29 (a) and SW948 (b) metabolic activity. The study was conducted for 24 h. The MTT assay. The results are shown as a percentage of the control, arbitrarily set to 100%.
Figure 3The effect of Rubus caesius extracts influence on HT29 (a) and SW948 (b) cellular membranes stability. The study was conducted for 24 h. The NR uptake assay. The results are shown as a percentage of the control, arbitrarily set to 100%.
Figure 4The DPPH free radical scavenging activity. The % of reduced radicals by Rubus caesius extracts is compared to the pure methanol activity set as a nonreducing control (0% reduction).
DPPH radical reduction assay. IC50 values of extracts action compared to corresponding activity of synthetic vitamin E derivative (Trolox).
| Samples | IC50 of extract activity ( | Trolox concentration ( |
|---|---|---|
| RC1 | 240.9 | 20.5 |
| RC2 | 101.8 | 26.8 |
| RC3 | 123.5 | 32.7 |
| RC4 | 54.8 | 23.0 |
| RC5 | 44.5 | 21.3 |
| RC6 | 131.3 | 23.0 |
Figure 5Ferric-reducing activity assay. The % of reduced ferric ions by Rubus caesius extracts is compared to the untreated control (0% reduction).