J H Ahn1, I S Kim2, J H Yang3, I G Lee3, D H Seo3, S P Kim4. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Woncheon-Dong, Yeongtong-Gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi-Do 443-721, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, 150 Sungan-ro, Gangdong-gu, Seoul 134-701, Republic of Korea ilseokkim@naver.com. 3. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, 150 Sungan-ro, Gangdong-gu, Seoul 134-701, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Pusan National University Hospital, 305 Gudeok-ro, Seo-gu, Busan 602-739, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The lower superior vena cava (SVC), near its junction with the right atrium (RA), is considered the ideal location for the central venous catheter tip to ensure proper function and prevent injuries. We determined catheter insertion depth with a new formula using the sternoclavicular joint and the carina as radiological landmarks, with a 1.5 cm safety margin. The accuracy of tip positioning with the radiological landmark-based technique (R) and Peres' formula (P) was compared using transoesophageal echocardiography. METHODS:Real-time ultrasound-guided central venous catheter insertion was done through the right internal jugular or subclavian vein. Patients were randomly assigned to either the P group (n=93) or the R group (n=95). Optimal catheter tip position was considered to be within 2 cm above and 1 cm below the RA-SVC junction. Catheter tip position, abutment, angle to the vascular wall, and flow stream were evaluated on a bicaval view. RESULTS: The distance from the skin insertion point to the RA-SVC junction and determined depth of catheter insertion were more strongly correlated in the R group [17.4 (1.2) and 16.7 (1.5) cm; r=0.821, P<0.001] than in the P group [17.3 (1.2) and 16.4 (1.1) cm; r=0.517, P<0.001], with z=3.96 (P<0.001). More tips were correctly positioned in the R group than in the P group (74 vs 93%, P=0.001). Abutment, tip angle to the lateral wall >40°, and disrupted flow stream were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter tip position was more accurate with a radiological landmark-based technique than with Peres' formula. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry of Korea: https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/index.jsp KCT0001937.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The lower superior vena cava (SVC), near its junction with the right atrium (RA), is considered the ideal location for the central venous catheter tip to ensure proper function and prevent injuries. We determined catheter insertion depth with a new formula using the sternoclavicular joint and the carina as radiological landmarks, with a 1.5 cm safety margin. The accuracy of tip positioning with the radiological landmark-based technique (R) and Peres' formula (P) was compared using transoesophageal echocardiography. METHODS: Real-time ultrasound-guided central venous catheter insertion was done through the right internal jugular or subclavian vein. Patients were randomly assigned to either the P group (n=93) or the R group (n=95). Optimal catheter tip position was considered to be within 2 cm above and 1 cm below the RA-SVC junction. Catheter tip position, abutment, angle to the vascular wall, and flow stream were evaluated on a bicaval view. RESULTS: The distance from the skin insertion point to the RA-SVC junction and determined depth of catheter insertion were more strongly correlated in the R group [17.4 (1.2) and 16.7 (1.5) cm; r=0.821, P<0.001] than in the P group [17.3 (1.2) and 16.4 (1.1) cm; r=0.517, P<0.001], with z=3.96 (P<0.001). More tips were correctly positioned in the R group than in the P group (74 vs 93%, P=0.001). Abutment, tip angle to the lateral wall >40°, and disrupted flow stream were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter tip position was more accurate with a radiological landmark-based technique than with Peres' formula. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry of Korea: https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/index.jsp KCT0001937.
Authors: Mark D Weber; Thomas Conlon; Charlotte Woods-Hill; Stephanie L Watts; Eileen Nelson; Danielle Traynor; Bingqing Zhang; Daniela Davis; Adam S Himebauch Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Sun Key Kim; Jung Hwan Ahn; Yoon Kyung Lee; Bo Young Hwang; Min Kyung Lee; Il Seok Kim Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Jonas Auer; Joachim Braun; Julian Lenk; Johannes Gollrad; Sa-Ra Ro; Bernd Hamm; Maximilian de Bucourt Journal: Acta Radiol Open Date: 2022-09-15