Literature DB >> 28099301

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Provides Higher Activity and Durability Than Valgus-Producing Proximal Tibial Osteotomy at 5 to 7 Years.

Aaron J Krych1, Patrick Reardon, Paul Sousa, Ayoosh Pareek, Michael Stuart, Mark Pagnano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cases of patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis who were ≤55 years old and had a proximal tibial osteotomy (PTO) or medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) were compared. Outcomes included postoperative activity level, function, and survivorship free of revision to total knee arthroplasty.
METHODS: Between 1998 and 2013, data were available for 240 patients between 18 and 55 years old with medial compartment arthritis and varus malalignment who were treated either with PTO (57 patients) or with UKA (183 patients). The mean age was 42.7 years for the 57 patients (41 men and 16 women) in the PTO group versus 49.2 years for the 183 patients (82 men and 101 women) in the UKA group. The Tegner activity level and Lysholm knee scores were evaluated at 3 months and at 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively as well as at the time of the final follow-up. The end point for survival was defined as revision to total knee arthroplasty. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to evaluate the difference between the groups with respect to the Tegner and Lysholm scores at the respective follow-up intervals. Multivariate regression was used to assess potential confounders.
RESULTS: Preoperatively, the PTO and UKA groups had similar Tegner (3.0 ± 1.3 and 2.6 ± 0.09, respectively) and Lysholm scores (69.5 ± 7.3 and 71.6 ± 5.4). Postoperatively, the UKA group had significantly superior mean Tegner scores compared with the PTO group at 3 months (3.82 and 2.02, respectively), at 2 years (4.33 and 3.75), and at the time of the final follow-up (4.48 and 3.08), while the Lysholm scores were higher at 3 months (88.0 and 76.3) and at the final follow-up (90.0 and 80.2) (p < 0.01 for all). Multivariate analysis showed UKA to be an independent predictor of activity level at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years, as well as at the final follow-up. The survivorship was 77% in the PTO group at an average of 7.2 years and 94% in the UKA group at an average of 5.8 years (p < 0.01). The average time to failure was 98 months (range, 38 to 169 months) in the PTO group and 42 months (range, 2 to 123 months) in the UKA group (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: In this comparative cohort study of young patients with isolated unicompartmental arthritis, those treated with UKA reached a higher level of activity early after surgery and it persisted at mid-term follow-up. The UKA group had earlier, but less frequent, revision to total knee arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28099301     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  12 in total

Review 1.  Larger range of motion and increased return to activity, but higher revision rates following unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in patients under 65: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura J Kleeblad; Jelle P van der List; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is superior to high tibial osteotomy in post-operative recovery and participation in recreational and sports activities.

Authors:  Man Soo Kim; In Jun Koh; Sueen Sohn; Ji Hwan Jeong; Yong In
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Long-term survival is similar between closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with similar demographics.

Authors:  Sang Jun Song; Dae Kyung Bae; Kang Il Kim; Cheol Hee Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  High tibial osteotomy with an external fixator or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for varus knee in young patients?

Authors:  Amit Kumar Yadav; Mangal Parihar; Ilaria Mariani; Riccardo Giorgino; Laura Mangiavini; Nicola Ursino; Riccardo D'Ambrosi
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-09-13

5.  High Tibial Osteotomy Versus Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Unicompartmental Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ishith Seth; Gabriella Bulloch; Nimish Seth; Damien Gibson; Anish Rastogi; Kirk Lower; Aaron Rodwell; Warwick Bruce
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 1.033

6.  Risk of Revision and Adverse Outcomes Following Partial Knee Replacement and High Tibial Osteotomy for Unicompartmental Knee Osteoarthritis: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Authors:  Sun-Ho Lee; Hae-Rim Kim; Eun-Kyoo Song; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 1.033

Review 7.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, is it superior to high tibial osteotomy in treating unicompartmental osteoarthritis? A meta-analysis and systemic review.

Authors:  Marcel Budhi Santoso; Lidong Wu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Amount and type of physical activity and sports from one year forward after hip or knee arthroplasty-A systematic review.

Authors:  Yvet Mooiweer; Inge van den Akker-Scheek; Martin Stevens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Better outcomes and reduced failures for arthroplasty over osteotomy for advanced compartmental knee osteoarthritis in patients older than 50 years.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Arne Driessen; Francesco Oliva; Gayle D Maffulli; Markus Tingart; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Return to Physical Activity After High Tibial Osteotomy or Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Pooling Data Analysis.

Authors:  James Belsey; Sam K Yasen; Simon Jobson; James Faulkner; Adrian J Wilson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.