| Literature DB >> 28098225 |
Yanfen Lin1, Leilei Zhou1, Jian Xu1, Zhongcheng Luo1, Haidong Kan2,3, Jinsong Zhang1, Chonghuai Yan1, Jun Zhang1.
Abstract
To investigate the association of air pollution with maternal stress during pregnancy, we enrolled 1,931 women during mid-to-late pregnancy in Shanghai in 2010. The "Life-Event Scale for Pregnant Women" and "Symptom-Checklist-90-Revised Scale" (SCL-90-R) were used to evaluate life event stress and emotional stress, respectively. Air pollution data were collected for each district where pregnant women lived during pregnancy. We associated ambient air pollution with stress scores using multivariable logistic regression models. After adjusting for relevant covariates, an interquartile-range (IQR) increase in sulphur-dioxide (SO2) (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.11-1.52) and particulate-matter with an aerodynamic-diameter <10 μm (PM10) (OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.02-1.34) concentrations on the recruitment day, and in the 5-day moving average concentrations of nitrogen-dioxide (NO2) (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.05-1.70) were associated with high Global-Severity-Indices (P75-P100) of the SCL-90-R. These associations were stronger among women bearing high levels (P25-P100) of air pollutants than among women experiencing low levels (P1-P25) of pollutants. The stronger associations and higher levels of pollutants were observed in the cool season than in the warm season. SO2 increases on the recruitment day were also associated with an increased risk of high depression scores (P75-P100). Our findings supported a dose-dependent association between air pollution and emotional stress during pregnancy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28098225 PMCID: PMC5241869 DOI: 10.1038/srep40956
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The map of Shanghai with the sampling locations marked.
(The map was made by ArcGIS 10.0, URL link: http://www.esri.com/). A total of 1931 pregnant women living in the 19 districts of Shanghai were enrolled in 2010 in this study. The selected districts and hospitals were marked as above (hospitals were marked with triangle, the selected 2 urban districts were filled with red, and the selected 2 surburban districts were filled with green). The 9 urban districts: Huangpu, Luwan, Xuhui, Changning, Jingan, Putuo, Zhabei, Hongkou, Yangpu; The 10 suburban districts: Baoshan, Minhang, Jiading, Songjiang, Qingpu, Fengxian, Jinshan, Pudong, Nanhui, Chongming.
Socio-demographic characteristics of the 1,931 participants
| Variable names | No (%), mean ± SD, or Medium (P25, P75) |
|---|---|
| 28.0 (4.0) | |
| Junior high school or lower | 442 (23.0%) |
| Senior high school | 353 (18.4%) |
| College or University level | 985 (51.2%) |
| Postgraduate level | 143 (7.4%) |
| <2,000 | 311 (16.4%) |
| 2,000–5,000 | 699 (36.9%) |
| 5,000–10,000 | 565 (29.8%) |
| >10,000 | 319 (16.8%) |
| Living with husband | 997 (52.2%) |
| Living with husband and parents-in-law | 605 (31.7%) |
| Living with parents | 222 (11.6%) |
| Living alone | 87 (4.6%) |
| No | 1653 (85.7%) |
| Yes | 275 (14.3%) |
| Never | 1199 (62.6%) |
| 1–2 times | 654 (34.1%) |
| 3 or more times | 63 (3.3%) |
| 1.2 (1.1, 1.3) | |
| 230.7 (84.0, 332.0) | |
Weather and air pollution levels in Shanghai during the study period.
| Mean ± SD | Median | Range | IQR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean temperature (°C) | 21.5 ± 6.7 | 22.5 | −0.6–34.1 | 17.2–26.8 |
| Relative humidity (%) | 70.6 ± 12.3 | 71.0 | 38.0–93.0 | 64.0–80.0 |
| Wind speed (m/s) | 3.1 ± 1.1 | 3.0 | 1.2–6.6 | 2.4–3.8 |
| Mean SO2 (μg/m3) | 23.7 ± 10.3 | 22.0 | 6.0–80.0 | 16.0–30.0 |
| Mean NO2 (μg/m3) | 23.1 ± 8.6 | 23.2 | 4.8–79.2 | 16.8–29.6 |
| Mean PM10 (μg/m3) | 73.9 ± 46.8 | 62.0 | 14.0–310.0 | 39.0–96.0 |
Geometric means (95%CI) of air pollutant concentrations in different seasons.
| Air pollutants | Lag days | Cool season (n = 476) | Warm season (n = 1455) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SO2 | Lag 0 | 22.19 (21.29, 23.14) | 21.34 (20.87, 21.82) | 0.141 |
| Lag 0–2 | 24.23 (23.55, 24.93) | 21.40 (21.01, 21.79) | 0.081 | |
| Lag 0–5 | 25.41 (24.66, 26.19) | 20.97 (20.63, 21.31) | 0.002 | |
| Lag 0–7 | 25.32 (24.64, 26.02) | 21.24 (20.91, 21.57) | <0.001 | |
| Lag 0–14 | 25.62 (25.02, 26.23) | 21.83 (21.54, 22.12) | <0.001 | |
| NO2 | Lag 0 | 22.15 (21.32, 23.01) | 21.20 (20.79, 21.62) | <0.001 |
| Lag 0–2 | 24.57 (23.90, 25.27) | 21.40 (21.05, 21.76) | <0.001 | |
| Lag 0–5 | 24.67 (24.08, 25.28) | 20.96 (20.66, 21.28) | <0.001 | |
| Lag 0–7 | 24.06 (23.56, 24.57) | 21.07 (20.76, 21.39) | <0.001 | |
| Lag 0–14 | 23.77 (23.36, 24.19) | 21.14 (20.87, 21.41) | <0.001 | |
| PM10 | Lag 0 | 67.29 (63.37, 71.46) | 60.30 (58.55, 62.10) | <0.001 |
| Lag 0–2 | 70.45 (66.62, 74.51) | 61.61 (60.34, 62.91) | <0.001 | |
| Lag 0–5 | 67.04 (64.16, 70.05) | 59.73 (58.63, 60.85) | <0.001 | |
| Lag 0–7 | 69.22 (66.41, 72.15) | 61.38 (60.33, 62.44) | <0.001 | |
| Lag 0–14 | 71.97 (69.18, 74.87) | 63.72 (62.79, 64.67) | <0.001 |
aANOVA was used to examine the difference of the means (log transformation) of air pollution concentrations between the cool season and the warm season.
Figure 2Increased risks of high maternal emotional stress (GSI scores: P75-P100) for an IQR increase in SO2 (A, IQR = 14.0 μg/m3), NO2 (B, IQR = 12.8 μg/m3), and PM10 (C, IQR = 57.0 μg/m3) at different lag days, and the modifying effects of complications of pregnancy (D–F) and anemia (G–I).
The best fitting lag structures for SO2, NO2, and PM10 were lag 0 (A), lag 0–5 (B), and lag 0 (C), respectively. In D–I, blue square: women without complications of pregnancy/anemia; red square: women with complications of pregnancy/anemia. The association was stronger among participants without complications of pregnancy/anemia than among women with complications of pregnancy/anemia.
The dose-dependent association between levels of air pollutants (per IQR increase) and the risks of high maternal emotional stressa.
| Air pollutants | The odds ratios (95%CI) of high maternal stress (GSI: P75-P100) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lag 0 | Lag 0–2 | Lag 0–5 | Lag 0–7 | Lag 0–14 | |
| SO2 (μg/m3) | |||||
| <25 th | 0.33 (0.06, 1.96) | 0.46 (0.10, 2.07) | 1.36 (0.24, 7.76) | 2.16 (0.53, 8.85) | 1.07 (0.28, 4.11) |
| ≥25 th | 1.36 (1.12, 1.66) | 1.12 (0.88, 1.44) | 1.22 (0.92, 1.61) | 1.22 (0.87, 1.71) | 1.05 (0.71, 1.57) |
| NO2 (μg/m3) | |||||
| <25 th | 1.13 (0.28, 4.50) | 1.01 (0.32, 3.19) | 0.54 (0.8, 1.59) | 0.51 (0.19, 1.40) | 1.34 (0.45, 3.95) |
| ≥25 th | 1.04 (0.82, 1.32) | 1.00 (0.76, 1.32) | 1.60 (1.12, 2.27) | 1.71 (1.13, 2.59) | 1.35 (0.83, 2.19) |
| PM10 (μg/m3) | |||||
| <25 th | 3.93 (0.40, 38.18) | 0.17 (0.02, 1.29) | 3.77 (0.31, 45.77) | 0.94 (0.06, 13.92) | 2.02 (0.10, 42.59) |
| ≥25 th | 1.19 (1.02, 1.40) | 1.09 (0.95, 1.26) | 1.30 (1.04, 1.62) | 1.23 (0.93, 1.63) | 1.14 (0.76, 1.70) |
*P < 0.05.
aAdjusted for maternal age, education, occupation, complications of pregnancy, abortion history, family monthly income, structues of family type, average temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed.
Increased risks [OR (95%CI)] of high maternal emotional stress (GSI: P75-P100) for an IQR increase in SO2, NO2, and PM10 concentrations by seasona.
| Air pollutants | Lag days | Cool season | Warm season |
|---|---|---|---|
| SO2 | Lag 0 | 1.31 (1.00, 1.73) | 1.21 (0.98, 1.49) |
| Lag 0–2 | 1.21 (0.84, 1.75) | 0.99 (0.78, 1.27) | |
| Lag 0–5 | 1.19 (0.82, 1.73) | 1.11 (0.84, 1.45) | |
| Lag 0–7 | 0.93 (0.56, 1.55) | 1.06 (0.79, 1.44) | |
| Lag 0–14 | 1.06 (0.58, 1.94) | 1.12 (0.79, 1.58) | |
| NO2 | Lag 0 | 1.05 (0.78, 1.42) | 1.11 (0.89, 1.39) |
| Lag 0–2 | 1.14 (0.79, 1.63) | 1.04 (0.81, 1.34) | |
| Lag 0–5 | 1.58 (0.98, 2.54) | 1.29 (0.94, 1.78) | |
| Lag 0–7 | 1.37 (0.77, 2.43) | 1.17 (0.82, 1.66) | |
| Lag 0–14 | 1.30 (0.67, 2.54) | 1.20 (0.80, 1.79) | |
| PM10 | Lag 0 | 1.28 (1.04, 1.57) | 1.04 (0.86, 1.27) |
| Lag 0–2 | 1.09 (0.93, 1.27) | 1.00 (0.75, 1.33) | |
| Lag 0–5 | 1.25 (0.91, 1.72) | 1.19 (0.89, 1.61) | |
| Lag 0–7 | 1.06 (0.62, 1.82) | 1.08 (0.76, 1.55) | |
| Lag 0–14 | 0.68 (0.34, 1.37) | 1.14 (0.56, 2.31) |
aAdjusted for maternal age, education, occupation, complications of pregnancy, abortion history, family monthly income, types of family structure, average temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed.
bCool season: from November to the next April.
cWarm season: from May to October.
*The risks were significantly different between the warm season and the cool season (P <0.05).
Air pollutant levels (an IQR increase) and increased risks of maternal high emotional stress (GSI: P75-P100) using single-, two-, and three pollutant models.
| Pollutants and models | Lag days | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SO2 | |||
| Single model | Lag 0 | 1.30 (1.11, 1.52) | 0.001 |
| +NO2 | Lag 0 | 1.38 (1.14, 1.66) | 0.001 |
| +PM10 | Lag 0 | 1.27 (1.05, 1.53) | 0.013 |
| +NO2+PM10 | Lag 0 | 1.33 (1.09, 1.63) | 0.006 |
| NO2 | |||
| Single model | Lag 0–5 | 1.34 (1.05, 1.70) | 0.018 |
| +SO2 | Lag 0–5 | 1.28 (0.94, 1.75) | 0.116 |
| +PM10 | Lag 0–5 | 1.25 (0.95, 1.65) | 0.111 |
| +SO2+PM10 | Lag 0–5 | 1.24 (0.90, 1.71) | 0.195 |
| PM10 | |||
| Single model | Lag 0 | 1.16 (1.02, 1.34) | 0.029 |
| +SO2 | Lag 0 | 1.04 (0.88, 1.23) | 0.640 |
| +NO2 | Lag 0 | 1.18 (1.00, 1.38) | 0.054 |
| +SO2+PM10 | Lag 0 | 1.08 (0.91, 1.29) | 0.382 |
*P < 0.05.
aAdjusted for maternal age, education, occupation, complications of pregnancy, abortion history, family monthly income, types of family structure, average temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed.
Estimated effects of air pollutants (per IQR increase) on high maternal depression scores (P75-P100)a, b.
| Item | Lag day | SO2 (IQR = 14.0 μg/m3) | NO2 (IQR = 12.8 μg/m3) | PM10 (IQR = 57.0 μg/m3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||
| Depression scores | Lag 0 | 1.22 (1.05, 1.42) | 1.05 (0.89, 1.24) | 1.08 (0.94, 1.23) |
| Lag 0–2 | 1.11 (0.92, 1.33) | 1.02 (0.84, 1.23) | 1.04 (0.92, 1.18) | |
| Lag 0–5 | 1.12 (0.92, 1.37) | 1.21 (0.96, 1.52) | 1.13 (0.94, 1.37) | |
| Lag 0–7 | 1.10 (0.88, 1.38) | 1.19 (0.92, 1.54) | 1.09 (0.86, 1.38) | |
| Lag 0–14 | 1.15 (0.89, 1.49) | 1.20 (0.89, 1.63) | 1.05 (0.76, 1.45) |
*P < 0.05.
aLogistic regression models were used.
bAdjusted for maternal age, education, occupation, complications of pregnancy, abortion history, family monthly income, types of family structure, average temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed.