| Literature DB >> 28097054 |
V Bleu Knight1, Elba E Serrano1.
Abstract
Biomaterial scaffolds have the potential to enhance neuronal development and regeneration. Understanding the genetic responses of astrocytes and neurons to biomaterials could facilitate the development of synthetic environments that enable the specification of neural tissue organization with engineered scaffolds. In this study, we used high throughput transcriptomic and imaging methods to determine the impact of a hydrogel, PuraMatrix™, on human glial cells in vitro. Parallel studies were undertaken with cells grown in a monolayer environment on tissue culture polystyrene. When the Normal Human Astrocyte (NHA) cell line is grown in a hydrogel matrix environment, the glial cells adopt a structural organization that resembles that of neuronal-glial cocultures, where neurons form clusters that are distinct from the surrounding glia. Statistical analysis of next generation RNA sequencing data uncovered a set of genes that are differentially expressed in the monolayer and matrix hydrogel environments. Functional analysis demonstrated that hydrogel-upregulated genes can be grouped into three broad categories: neuronal differentiation and/or neural plasticity, response to neural insult, and sensory perception. Our results demonstrate that hydrogel biomaterials have the potential to transform human glial cell identity, and may have applications in the repair of damaged brain tissue.Entities:
Keywords: 3D culture; Astrocyte; Gene expression; Hydrogel; RNA-seq; Tissue engineering; Transcriptome
Year: 2017 PMID: 28097054 PMCID: PMC5234438 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2829
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Design of RNA sequencing experiment.
The second passages of normal human astrocyte cells from two biological donors were cultured in monolayer and matrix environments for 5 days prior to RNA extraction. Media were replenished on day 3. Cryo vial symbol is courtesy of the symbol library provided by the Integration and Application Network, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (ian.umces.edu/symbols/).
Figure 2Phase contrast images.
Normal human astrocytes cultured in monolayer (A, C) and matrix (B, D) environments for five days and were imaged live, prior to RNA extraction for transcriptome analysis. Representative images are shown for two biological donors: Donor A (A, B); Donor B (C, D). Scale bar = 50 µm.
RNA-seq alignments to the Human Genome.
Paired-end RNA-seq reads from Astrocyte RNA were aligned to the Human Genome (HG19; UCSC) using TopHat (Version 2.0.8b).
| Sample | Total reads | Total uniquely aligned reads | % Uniquely aligned | Both ends aligned | Discordant alignments | Pairs with multiple alignments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monolayer A Lane 1 | 129052614 | 102805592 | 79.7 | 56807599 | 1969147 | 4548539 |
| Monolayer A Lane 2 | 114220280 | 83950884 | 73.5 | 52070171 | 3695376 | 7878121 |
| Matrix A Lane 1 | 129408746 | 105438159 | 81.5 | 57860404 | 1864415 | 4186338 |
| Matrix A Lane 2 | 113611166 | 85854999 | 75.6 | 52197531 | 3301865 | 7133894 |
| Monolayer B Lane 1 | 100083832 | 81127497 | 81.1 | 44361901 | 1207636 | 3280062 |
| Monolayer B Lane 2 | 92612888 | 70105954 | 75.7 | 42351343 | 2541256 | 5705233 |
| Matrix B Lane 1 | 93772260 | 76433102 | 81.5 | 41399683 | 1092590 | 2770120 |
| Matrix B Lane 2 | 84028222 | 64455911 | 76.7 | 38185638 | 2164749 | 4671503 |
| Average | 107098751 | 83771512 | 78.2 | 48154284 | 2229629 | 5021726 |
Figure 3Boxplots of raw RNA-seq alignment counts (A) and thresholded FPKM normalized data (B).
Normal human astrocyte RNA samples from two different donors (denoted by A and B) grown in monolayer and matrix conditions were multiplexed for sequencing and replicated on two different lanes (denoted by 1 and 2).
Figure 4Heat maps of Euclidean sample-to-sample distances and cluster dendrograms of raw RNA-seq alignment count (A) and FPKM normalized data (B).
Normal human astrocyte RNA samples from two different donors (denoted by A and B) grown with monolayer and matrix conditions were multiplexed for sequencing and replicated on two different lanes (denoted by ln1 and ln2).
Figure 5Principal Component Analysis.
Plots of raw read count data (A) and FPKM normalized data (B) from RNA sequencing of normal human astrocyte RNA from two different donors (denoted by A and B) grown with TCPS and peptide hydrogel. The pairs of dots correspond to technical replication on two different lanes.
Figure 6Heatmap with hierarchical clustering for the most expressed genes common to RNASeq datasets from NHA grown in TCPS and in hydrogel environments (n = 115).
FPKM values for RNA samples from two different donors (A, B) grown with monolayer (purple) and matrix (green) environments, and sequenced on two different lanes (1, 2).
Figure 7Frequency analysis of DAVID ontological terms for the most expressed genes common to RNASeq datasets from NHA grown in TCPS and in hydrogel environments (n = 115).
Wordle was used to arrange the DAVID terms that described the nine significant clusters (enrichment scores > 1.3; File S6) of the most highly transcribed CTSs into an image that represents increasing frequency with larger font size.
Figure 8Percentages of established neural biomarkers that met RNA sequencing threshold criteria for NHA grown in monolayer and matrix environments.
RNA sequencing data for NHA was compared to genes that were found to be enriched in neural cell types (A) and subtypes (B) by Cahoy et al. (2008).
Differentially Expressed Genes.
CTSs with log2 transformed fold change values ≥|2|.
| DEG | log2 FC | |
|---|---|---|
| CHI3L1 | 4.18 | 4.40E−02 |
| TNFAIP8L3 | 4.10 | 8.99E−03 |
| SPP1 | 3.44 | 1.31E−02 |
| AREG | 3.19 | 2.56E−05 |
| A2M | 3.16 | 1.07E−03 |
| GPNMB | 3.08 | 8.84E−16 |
| HEY2 | 3.03 | 8.04E−13 |
| PTGS2 | 2.98 | 1.72E−10 |
| CDH23 | 2.86 | 4.33E−06 |
| BMF | 2.76 | 6.30E−12 |
| SLC16A6 | 2.75 | 2.65E−04 |
| ANGPTL4 | 2.70 | 7.23E−03 |
| SPOCK3 | 2.62 | 1.18E−10 |
| CYGB | 2.52 | 3.98E−10 |
| PIEZO2 | 2.45 | 3.06E−08 |
| EREG | 2.39 | 2.27E−04 |
| PTGDS | 2.36 | 5.16E−07 |
| NPTX1 | 2.30 | 4.15E−03 |
| SLITRK5 | 2.26 | 2.97E−02 |
| EPHB1 | 2.25 | 5.16E−07 |
| HMOX1 | 2.24 | 1.27E−03 |
| UNC5B | 2.20 | 1.12E−08 |
| CLDN14 | 2.18 | 2.86E−06 |
| NR4A2 | 2.16 | 4.89E−05 |
| IL1A | 2.15 | 2.08E−03 |
| RDH10 | 2.14 | 1.51E−02 |
| CYP1B1 | 2.14 | 1.20E−03 |
| HTRA1 | 2.13 | 3.06E−08 |
| NRG3 | 2.13 | 9.55E−07 |
| RAB27B | 2.11 | 1.26E−03 |
| ITGA8 | 2.06 | 4.89E−05 |
| IL21R | 2.04 | 7.21E−06 |
| ST8SIA4 | 2.04 | 5.27E−06 |
| GPR68 | 2.02 | 5.22E−06 |
| COL21A1 | 2.00 | 9.67E−02 |
| DUSP4 | 2.00 | 1.22E−06 |
| NPPB | −5.07 | 4.09E−02 |
| ACTG2 | −3.38 | 1.29E−09 |
| MAMDC2 | −2.50 | 8.73E−11 |
| DES | −2.22 | 1.48E−05 |
| GCNT4 | −2.13 | 2.70E−03 |
| DYSF | −2.06 | 4.28E−03 |
| EGF | −2.05 | 6.38E−03 |
Notes.
Significance levels marked by Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p values.
<0.1.
<0.01.
<0.001.
Figure 9Volcano plot of CTSs that fulfilled expression threshold criteria.
The log2 transformed fold change between monolayer and matrix environments is plotted against the negative log10 of the p value. The CTSs that were found to be significantly differentially expressed using our criteria of log2 fold change ≥ 2 and adjusted p values ≤ 0.1, 0.01, or 0.001 are shown in green, yellow, or red, respectively.
Significant Clusters of Differentially Expressed Genes.
DAVID Functional analysis of differentially expressed genes (log2 fold change ≥ 2 and adjusted p values ≤ 0.1) resulted in nine significant functional clusters (enrichment score > 1.3).
| Cluster | Score | Description | Genes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6 | Glycoprotein, signal, signal peptide, glycosylation site: N-linked | A2M, NRG3, PTGS2, SPOCK3, EREG, PTGDS, ITGA8, ST8SIA4, AREG, GPNMB, SLITRK5, IL1A, COL21A1, IL21R, CHI3L1, GPR68, EPHB1, NPTX1, UNC5B, ANGPTL4, CDH23, SPP1 |
| 2 | 3.5 | Extracellular region, extracellular space, secreted | A2M, SPOCK3, EREG, COL21A1, HTRA1, HMOX1, CHI3L1, AREG, IL1A, SPP1, ANGPTL4 |
| 3 | 2.0 | ErbB signalling pathway, domain: EGF-like, EGF, EGF-like region: conserved site, EGF-like, EGF-like: type 3, growth factor | NRG3, PTGS2, EREG, AREG |
| 4 | 1.9 | Cell morphogenesis involved in neuron differentiation, cell projection organization, neuron projection morphogenesis, neuron development, axonogenesis | UNC5B, ITGA8, NR4A2, SLITRK5, EPHB1, CDH23 |
| 5 | 1.6 | Response to (wounding, inflammation, extracellular signal, nutrient levels, steroid hormone stimulus, endogenous stimulus, organic substance, inorganic substance), organelle lumen, membrane-enclosed lumen | GPR68, IL1A, DUSP4, A2M, CYP1B1, PTGS2, HMOX1, NR4A2, SPP1 |
| 6 | 1.6 | Blood vessel morphogenesis, vasculature development, regulation of cell proliferation, angiogenesis | PTGS2, EREG, HMOX1, HEY2, IL1A, SPP1, ANGPTL4 |
| 7 | 1.6 | Extracellular matrix, proteinaceous extracellular matrix | SPOCK3, COL21A1, SPP1, ANGPTL4 |
| 8 | 1.5 | Ossification, biomineral formation, bone development, skeletal system development | PTGS2, GPNMB, SPP1 |
| 9 | 1.4 | Positive regulation’ of (multicellular organismal process, cytokine biosynthetic process, cell communication, macromolecule biosynthetic process, cellular biosynthetic process, macromolecule metabolic process, regulation of cytokine production, cell proliferation | PTGS2, EREG, HMOX1, HEY2, IL1A, SPP1 |
Figure 10Protein networks predicted by STRING analysis.
DEGs were used as input for the STRING database using the high stringency setting. Ten interacting nodes (boxed) are shown for networks derived from DEGs upregulated in monolayer (A) and matrix (B) conditions (not boxed).
Figure 11Expression levels and ontological characterization of genes upregulated in hydrogel-cultured NHA.
Normalized expression levels (FPKM) for hydrogel-upregulated genes are shown for monolayer (dark grey) and matrix (light grey) cultures (A). Functional classification categories assigned to hydrogel-upregulated genes by DAVID (blue) or through manual curation (purple). Categories are displayed left to right in order from those with the greatest number of genes (synaptic plasticity; n = 10) to the least number of genes (anterograde transport, n = 1).
Figure 12Class III β-tubulin Immunocytochemistry.
Optical sections of NHA samples cultured in monolayer (A) and matrix (B) environments for 5 days. Cells were fixed prior to staining class III β-tubulin (green) and nuclei (blue) with anti –TUBB3 antibody and Hoescht 33342, respectively. Scale bar = 200 µm.