| Literature DB >> 28096962 |
Seyedeh Neda Mousavi1, Fariba Koohdani2, Mohamadreza Baghaban Eslaminejad3, Pantea Izadi4, Mohamadreza Eshraghian5, Forough Azam Sayahpour3, Leila Shafiei Neek6, Farzad Shidfar7.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Maternal high-fat diet has been shown to have deleterious effects on the offspring bones. However, there is no study to assess the effects of type and amount of maternal dietary oil in an isocaloric diet, with focus on extra virgin olive oil (EVOO). The objective of the current study was to test the hypothesis that type of maternal dietary oil has more effects than its amount in an isocaloric diet during gestation and lactation on bone genes expression in offspring in adolescence.Entities:
Keywords: Dietary oil; Fetal programming; Gestation; Lactation; Mouse; Olive oil; Osteoblastogenesis
Year: 2016 PMID: 28096962 PMCID: PMC5220235 DOI: 10.22038/ijbms.2016.7915
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Basic Med Sci ISSN: 2008-3866 Impact factor: 2.699
Figure 1Schematic overview of the experimental design. Female C57BL/6 mice were exposed during gestation and lactation to a normal-fat (16%) regular mouse AIN 93G diet containing soybean oil or EVOO, or to a high-fat AIN 93G (45%) diet containing soybean oil or EVOO. All pups received 16% soybean oil diet after weaning and were sacrificed at 6 weeks of age
Ingredient composition of the diets administered to mice (AIN 93G diet)
| Diets | Soybean | Olive | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nutrients | 16% | 45% | 16% | 45% |
| Casein (g/kg) | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Cornstarch (g/kg) | 530 | 247 | 530 | 247 |
| Sucrose (g/kg) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Soybean oil (g/kg) | 70 | 198 | - | - |
| EVOO (g/kg) | - | - | 70 | 198 |
| Fiber (g/kg) | 50 | 204.5 | 50 | 204.5 |
| Mineral mix (g/kg) | 35 | 35 | 35 | 35 |
| Vitamin mix (g/kg) | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| L-cys (g/kg) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Choline bitartrate (g/kg) | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.008 | |
| Energy (Kcal/g) | 3.97 | 3.97 | 3.97 | 3.97 |
EVOO: extra virgin olive oil, L-cys: L- cysteine
Real-time RT-PCR primer sequences
| Genes | Primers | Length |
|---|---|---|
| OPG | F: GGGCGTTACCTGGAGATCG | 19 |
| RANK-L | F: CAGCATCGCTCTGTTCCTGTA | 21 |
| Ctnnb1 | F: CCTCCCAAGTCCTTTATGAATGG | 23 |
| PPARγ2 | F: GCCCTTTGGTGACTTTATGGA | 21 |
| GAPDH | F: GACTTCAACAGCAACTCCCAC | 21 |
F, forward; R, reverse.
official name of beta-catenin
OPG: osteoprotegerin; RANK-L: nuclear factor (NF-kB) ligand; PPRRɤ2: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma 2; GAPDH: Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase
Weight and food intake of pups
| Groups | Type of oils | Amounts of oils | Sex of pups | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Soybean | EVOO | 16% | 45% | Male | Female | |||
| Birth weight (g) | 1.39±0.3 | 1.04±0.1 | *<0.001 | 1.25±0.3 | 1.27±0.2 | 0.16 | 1.3±0.2 | 1.15±0.2 | *0.002 |
| Adolescence weight (g) | 20.1±2.1 | 15.2±1.7 | *<0.001 | 17.8±3.1 | 17.5±3.2 | 0.34 | 19.1±2.7 | 16.2±2.8 | *<0.001 |
| Food intake[ | 9.5±0.7 | 9.7±0.8 | 0.65 | 9.5±0.8 | 9.6±0.6 | 0.8 | 9.7±0.7 | 9.5±0.7 | 0.61 |
| Food intake[ | 11.9±0.7 | 11.6±0.5 | 0.54 | 11.7±0.7 | 11.9±0.6 | 0.58 | 11.8±0.5 | 11.6±0.5 | 0.75 |
| Food intake[ | 23.6±1.1 | 23.5±0.8 | 0.58 | 23.5±1 | 23.7±0.8 | 0.79 | 23.6±0.9 | 23.5±0.8 | 0.81 |
Values are reported as the means±SE (N= 32 in each group)
Means of food intake at the end of week 1 after weaning
Means of food intake at the end of week 2 after weaning
Means of food intake at the end of week 3 after weaning
To adjust for confounding variables and assess the interactions among different variables (types and amounts of maternal dietary oil, as well as sex of offspring), ANCOVA was used (*statistically significant)
Figure 2Means of target gene expression in offspring according to the amounts of maternal dietary oil. The effects of the amount of maternal dietary oil, controlled by the type of oil on gene expression in bone; statistically evaluated by the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. In offspring born to soybean oil-fed mothers, significant differences were observed in OPG, RANK-L, the OPG/RANK-L ratio, beta-catenin, and PPARɤ2 gene expression between 16% and 45% oil-fed groups. The same results were observed in the offspring born to olive oil-fed mothers. (*P-value <0.05; **P-value<0.001)
OPG: osteoprotegerin; RANK-L: nuclear factor (NF-kB) ligand; PPRRɤ2: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma 2
Figure 3Means of target gene expression in offspring according to the type of maternal dietary oil. The effects of the type of maternal dietary oil, controlled by the amounts of maternal dietary oil on gene expression in bone; statistically evaluated by the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. In offspring born to 16% oil-fed mothers, significant differences were observed in RANK-L, the OPG/RANK-L ratio, beta-catenin and PPARɤ2 gene expression between soybean oil and olive oil-fed groups. In the 45% oil-fed mothers, significant differences were observed in OPG, the OPG/RANK-L ratio and beta-catenin gene expression between soybean oil and olive oil-fed groups. (*P-value <0.05; **P-value<0.001)
OPG: osteoprotegerin; RANK-L: nuclear factor (NF-kB) ligand; PPRRɤ2: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma 2
Values are reported as the means±SE (N= 32 in each group)
Status of the target gene expression, type (soybean and olive oil), or amount (16% and 45%) of maternal dietary oil and the sex of the offspring
| OR (95% CI) | SE | B† | Variable’s level | Variable’s name | Genes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | Soybean oil | Types of oil | ||
| *2.8 (1.07, 7.48) | 0.49 | 1.04 | olive oil | ||
| 1 | - | 16% | Amounts of oil | ||
| ***0.12 (0.04, 0.35) | 0.53 | -2.08 | 45% | ||
| 1 | - | Female | Sex | ||
| ***0.09 (0.03, 0.27) | 0.5 | -2.4 | Male | ||
| 1 | - | Soybean | Types of oil | ||
| <0.001 (0.0, 0.0) | 55 | -19.1 | olive oil | ||
| 1 | - | 16% | Amounts of oil | ||
| <0.001 (0.0, 0.0) | 5536 | -23.4 | 45% | ||
| 1 | - | Female | Sex | ||
| 0.55 (0.09, 3.3) | 0.9 | -0.59 | Male | ||
| 1 | - | Soybean | Types of oil | ||
| **6.1 (1.85, 20.2) | 0.61 | 1.8 | olive oil | ||
| 1 | - | 16% | Amounts of oil | ||
| *0.3 (0.12, 0.94) | 0.53 | -1.1 | 45% | ||
| 1 | - | Female | Sex | ||
| ***0.03 (0.01, 0.12) | 0.63 | -3.4 | Male | ||
| 1 | - | Soybean | Types of oil | ||
| 2.4 (0.92, 6.37) | 0.49 | 0.88 | olive oil | ||
| 1 | - | 16% | Amounts of oil | ||
| ***0.06 (0.025, 0.17) | 0.49 | -2.71 | 45% | ||
| 1 | - | Female | Sex | ||
| 1.31 (0.51, 3.37) | 0.48 | 0.27 | Male | ||
| 1 | - | Soybean | Types of oil | ||
| 0.37 (0.13, 1.07) | 0.53 | -0.97 | olive oil | ||
| 1 | - | 16% | Amounts of oil | ||
| ***24 (8.3, 69.9) | 0.54 | 3.18 | 45% | ||
| 1 | - | Female | Sex | ||
| 2.4 (0.85, 6.8) | 0.53 | 0.88 | Male |