| Literature DB >> 28096826 |
Joanna Zembala-John1, Krzysztof Wilczek2, Zdzisław Tobota3, Piotr Chodór4, Daniel Cieśla5, Tomasz Jaźwiec6, Waldemar Banasiak7, Janina Stępińska8, Zbigniew Kalarus4, Grzegorz Opolski9, Marian Zembala6.
Abstract
Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease in adults in Europe and North America. Management of AS patients depends on accurate diagnosis of the cause and stage of the disease process: the first and definitive therapeutic choice for a growing number of elderly patients with symptomatic AS is surgical treatment. In patients not eligible for surgery, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) constitutes a safe and effective alternative. As an innovative, costly method of treatment, it requires however careful monitoring of its course, documenting its early and long-term results, and assessment of its safety and medical-economic cost-effectiveness. A medical registry seems to be an excellent tool to perform such analysis. The aim of this paper is to present the design and rationale for creation of the first National Cardiac-Cardiac Surgical Registry of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Treatment POL-TAVI, to describe its genesis and to highlight its key assumptions and aims. Despite its recent beginnings, the POL-TAVI Registry has already demonstrated its value and usability in monitoring and assessment of TAVI procedures, leading to further improvement and development of this new method in Poland. It constitutes an important and valuable tool for patients, the medical community and the payer.Entities:
Keywords: POL-TAVI; aortic stenosis; cost-effectiveness; registry; transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Year: 2016 PMID: 28096826 PMCID: PMC5233759 DOI: 10.5114/kitp.2016.64870
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol ISSN: 1731-5530
Fig. 1First TAVI patients with Zabrze TAVI team and Matthias Thielmann (Essen, Germany) as proctor, Zabrze, November 26th, 2008. Source: SCCS archives
Fig. 2Development of TAVI in Poland in years 2013–2015 – data from POL-TAVI Registry
Fig. 3Interview – patient profile: medical history, risk factors
Fig. 4TAVI Heart Team assessment: indications and contraindications to TAVI
Fig. 5Pre-procedural examination
Fig. 6Pre-procedural imaging
Fig. 7Documentation of TAVI procedure
Fig. 8Immediate TAVI results. Periprocedural complications
Fig. 9Discharge
Fig. 10Follow-up after 1 month – history of potential re-hospitalizations
Fig. 11Follow-up after 1 month: TAVI investigations, quality of life assessment
Fig. 12Inclusion of STS Risk Calculator and Clinical Frailty Scale in updated POL-TAVI CRF – adaptation to 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with VHD