| Literature DB >> 28096727 |
Sanghyeok Lim1, Hyunchul Rhim2, Min Woo Lee2, Kyoung Doo Song2, Tae Wook Kang2, Young-Sun Kim2, Hyo Keun Lim2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the in vivo efficiency of the biopsy tract radiofrequency ablation for hemostasis after core biopsy of the liver in a porcine liver model, including situations with bleeding tendency and a larger (16-gauge) core needle.Entities:
Keywords: Biopsy; Complications; Core biopsy tract ablation; Experimental study; Hemorrhage; Liver; Pulsed radiofrequency treatment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28096727 PMCID: PMC5240481 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.1.173
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Radiol ISSN: 1229-6929 Impact factor: 3.500
Fig. 1Newly developed thermocouple-monitored radiofrequency biopsy tract ablator.
Insulation sheath with electrode in place: device is composed of 1) 2 cm-long active electrode tip, 2) insulation sheath covered by polyester, 3) sheath handle, 4) electrode handle, 5) multi cable, and 6) connector.
Fig. 2US-guided biopsy procedure and assessment of blood loss from biopsy site.
A. US image during tract ablation procedure after core biopsy, combination of 2-cm active electrode tip (arrowheads, “1” in Figure 1) and insulation sheath (arrow, “2” in Figure 1) retracted together while monitoring temperature of electrode tip. B. Insulation sheath with engaged automated biopsy gun in place. 0.5-cm biopsy needle tip (arrow) protrudes from end of insulation sheath. US-guided liver biopsy was performed in coaxial manner through insulation sheath. C. Any blood from site (arrows) was soaked with dry gauze pads for five minutes without touching needle tract and was estimated by reweighing gauze pads. D. Two biopsy sites after measuring amount of blood loss and electrocauterization. Lesion at left upper was control biopsy site and lesion in right lower was experimental biopsy site. Arrowheads and arrows demonstrate electrocauterized points and RF electrode path with burn, respectively. RF = radiofrequency, US = ultrasound
Results of Laboratory Tests on Coagulopathy before and/or after Heparinization
| Pig No. | Heparinization | Hb (g/dL) | Hct (%) | Platelet (× 103/µL) | PT (INR) | aPTT (Sec) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before Heparinization | After Heparinization | ||||||
| 1 | No | 9.2 | 30.2 | 0270 | 1.05 | 32.5 | NA |
| 2 | No | 10.6 | 33.6 | 0329 | 1.02 | 46.0 | NA |
| 3 | Yes | 12.4 | 40.0 | 0250 | 0.95 | < 20 | > 300 |
| 4 | Yes | 11.9 | 37.4 | 0357 | 1.01 | 27.9 | > 300 |
aPTT = activated partial thromboplastin time, Hb = hemoglobin level, Hct = hematocrit level, INR = international normalized ratio, NA = not applicable, PT = prothrombin time, Sec = second
Comparison of Mean Blood Loss between Control (Non-Tract Ablation) and Experimental (Tract Ablation) Group in Each Pig
| Pig No. | Heparinization | Biopsy Needle (Gauge) | Mean Blood Loss (Gram) | Ratio* (Exp/Con) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (Non-Tract Ablation, n = 14) | Experimental (Tract Ablation, n = 14) | |||||
| 1 | No | 18 | 0.652 ± 1.052 (0.095–3.980) | 0.005 ± 0.018 (0.000–0.070) | < 0.001 | 0.008 |
| 2 | No | 16 | 0.378 ± 0.417 (0.060–1.270) | 0.245 ± 0.392 (0.000–1.303) | 0.101 | 0.648 |
| 3 | Yes | 18 | 1.862 ± 2.053 (0.190–7.900) | 0.066 ± 0.105 (0.000–0.345) | < 0.001 | 0.035 |
| 4 | Yes | 16 | 2.120 ± 2.718 (0.270–8.550) | 0.286 ± 0.344 (0.000–1.045) | < 0.001 | 0.135 |
Data are presented as mean blood loss ± standard deviations in grams. Numbers in parentheses are ranges. *Ratio of blood loss in experimental group to that in the control group. Con = control, Exp = experimental