Anna Morad1, Nila A Sathe2, David O Francis3, Melissa L McPheeters2, Sivakumar Chinnadurai4. 1. Departments of Pediatrics. 2. Health Policy, and Vanderbilt Evidence-based Practice Center, Institute for Medicine and Public Health, and. 3. Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 4. Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee sivakumar.chinnadurai@vanderbilt.edu.
Abstract
CONTEXT: The effectiveness of tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy ("tonsillectomy") for recurrent throat infection compared with watchful waiting is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To compare sleep, cognitive, behavioral, and health outcomes of tonsillectomy versus watchful waiting in children with recurrent throat infections. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. STUDY SELECTION: Two investigators independently screened studies against predetermined criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: One investigator extracted data with review by a second. Investigators independently assessed risk of bias and strength of evidence (SOE) and confidence in the estimate of effects. RESULTS: Seven studies including children with ≥3 infections in the previous 1 to 3 years addressed this question. In studies reporting baseline data, number of infections/sore throats decreased from baseline in both groups, with greater decreases in sore throat days, clinician contacts, diagnosed group A streptococcal infections, and school absences in tonsillectomized children in the short term (<12 months). Quality of life was not markedly different between groups at any time point. LIMITATIONS: Few studies fully categorized infection/sore throat severity; attrition was high. CONCLUSIONS: Throat infections, utilization, and school absences improved in the first postsurgical year in tonsillectomized children versus children not receiving surgery. Benefits did not persist over time; longer-term outcomes are limited. SOE is moderate for reduction in short-term throat infections and insufficient for longer-term reduction. SOE is low for no difference in longer-term streptococcal infection reduction. SOE is low for utilization and missed school reduction in the short term, low for no difference in longer-term missed school, and low for no differences in quality of life.
CONTEXT: The effectiveness of tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy ("tonsillectomy") for recurrent throat infection compared with watchful waiting is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To compare sleep, cognitive, behavioral, and health outcomes of tonsillectomy versus watchful waiting in children with recurrent throat infections. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. STUDY SELECTION: Two investigators independently screened studies against predetermined criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: One investigator extracted data with review by a second. Investigators independently assessed risk of bias and strength of evidence (SOE) and confidence in the estimate of effects. RESULTS: Seven studies including children with ≥3 infections in the previous 1 to 3 years addressed this question. In studies reporting baseline data, number of infections/sore throats decreased from baseline in both groups, with greater decreases in sore throat days, clinician contacts, diagnosed group A streptococcal infections, and school absences in tonsillectomized children in the short term (<12 months). Quality of life was not markedly different between groups at any time point. LIMITATIONS: Few studies fully categorized infection/sore throat severity; attrition was high. CONCLUSIONS:Throat infections, utilization, and school absences improved in the first postsurgical year in tonsillectomized children versus children not receiving surgery. Benefits did not persist over time; longer-term outcomes are limited. SOE is moderate for reduction in short-term throat infections and insufficient for longer-term reduction. SOE is low for no difference in longer-term streptococcal infection reduction. SOE is low for utilization and missed school reduction in the short term, low for no difference in longer-term missed school, and low for no differences in quality of life.
Authors: Nancy D Berkman; Kathleen N Lohr; Mohammed T Ansari; Ethan M Balk; Robert Kane; Marian McDonagh; Sally C Morton; Meera Viswanathan; Eric B Bass; Mary Butler; Gerald Gartlehner; Lisa Hartling; Melissa McPheeters; Laura C Morgan; James Reston; Priyanka Sista; Evelyn Whitlock; Stephanie Chang Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2014-12-20 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Ronald D Chervin; Susan S Ellenberg; Xiaoling Hou; Carole L Marcus; Susan L Garetz; Eliot S Katz; Elise K Hodges; Ron B Mitchell; Dwight T Jones; Raanan Arens; Raouf Amin; Susan Redline; Carol L Rosen Journal: Chest Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: J L Paradise; C D Bluestone; R Z Bachman; D K Colborn; B S Bernard; F H Taylor; K D Rogers; R H Schwarzbach; S E Stool; G A Friday Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1984-03-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J L Paradise; C D Bluestone; D K Colborn; B S Bernard; C G Smith; H E Rockette; M Kurs-Lasky Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-09-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jack L Paradise; Charles D Bluestone; D Kathleen Colborn; Beverly S Bernard; Howard E Rockette; Marcia Kurs-Lasky Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 7.124