Literature DB >> 28095741

Pullout performance comparison of novel expandable pedicle screw with expandable poly-ether-ether-ketone shells and cement-augmented pedicle screws.

Mehmet Fatih Aycan1, Tolga Tolunay2, Teyfik Demir3, Mesut Emre Yaman4, Yusuf Usta1.   

Abstract

Aim of this study is to assess the pullout performance of various pedicle screws in different test materials. Polyurethane foams (Grade 10 and Grade 40) produced in laboratory and bovine vertebrae were instrumented with normal, cannulated (cemented), novel expandable and normal (cemented) pedicle screws. Test samples were prepared according to the ASTM F543 standard testing protocols and surgical guidelines. To examine the screw placement and cement distribution, anteriosuperior and oblique radiographs were taken from each sample after insertion process was completed. Pullout tests were performed in an Instron 3369 testing device. Load versus displacement graphs were recorded and the ultimate pullout force was defined as the maximum load (pullout strength) sustained before failure of screw. Student's t-test was performed on each group whether the differences between pullout strength of pedicle screws were significant or not. While normal pedicle screws have the lowest pullout strength in all test materials, normal pedicle screws cemented with polymethylmethacrylate exhibit significantly higher pullout performance than others. For all test materials, there is a significant improvement in pullout strength of normal screws by augmentation. While novel expandable pedicle screws with expandable poly-ether-ether-ketone shells exhibited lower pullout performance than normal screws cemented with polymethylmethacrylate, their pullout performances in all groups were higher than the ones of normal and cannulated pedicle screws. For all test materials, although cannulated pedicle screws exhibit higher pullout strength than normal pedicle screws, there are no significant differences between the two groups. The novel expandable pedicle screws with expandable poly-ether-ether-ketone shells may be used instead of normal and cannulated pedicle screws cemented with polymethylmethacrylate due to their good performances.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bovine vertebra; expandable; pedicle screw; poly-ether-ether-ketone shell; polyurethane foam; pullout test

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28095741     DOI: 10.1177/0954411916687792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  6 in total

1.  Timing of PMMA cement application for pedicle screw augmentation affects screw anchorage.

Authors:  Werner Schmoelz; Christian Heinz Heinrichs; Sven Schmidt; Angel R Piñera; Felix Tome-Bermejo; Javier M Duart; Marlies Bauer; Luis Álvarez Galovich
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Insufficient stability of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical correlation of bone mineral density and pedicle screw fixation strength.

Authors:  Lukas Weiser; Gerd Huber; Kay Sellenschloh; Lennart Viezens; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Wolfgang Lehmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Application value of expansive pedicle screw in the lumbar short-segment fixation and fusion for osteoporosis patients.

Authors:  Fengbiao Weng; Jiazi Wang; Liwen Yang; Jincai Zeng; Yawei Chu; Zhigang Tian
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Testing Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screw Using Synthetic Bone Models: Is a Bilayer Foam Model a Better Representation of Vertebra?

Authors:  Vicky Varghese; Venkatesh Krishnan; Gurunathan Saravana Kumar
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-06-04

5.  Pullout Strength Predictor: A Machine Learning Approach.

Authors:  Ravi Khatri; Vicky Varghese; Sunil Sharma; Gurunathan Saravana Kumar; Harvinder Singh Chhabra
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2019-06-03

6.  The Biomechanical Properties of Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screws for Osteoporotic Spines.

Authors:  Yuetian Wang; Lei Yang; Chunde Li; Haolin Sun
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-02-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.