| Literature DB >> 28094301 |
Yanan Zhu1, Xinyi Chen1, Peiqing Chen1, Jianjun Wu2, Huixia Hua1, Ke Yao1.
Abstract
Endophthalmitis can be a devastating complication after cataract surgery. Therefore, this study sought to better understand the occurrence rate of acute-onset postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract surgery in Chinese small and medium-scale departments of ophthalmology, as well as identify its risk factors and assess the treatment options. This investigation revealed 52 postoperative endophthalmitis cases in 46,185 operations at 30 hospitals from 2011 to 2013, at an occurrence rate of 0.11%. A small cataract surgery volume of less than 500 cases per year (OR 2.21; p = 0.006), the absence of 0.5% povidone iodine (PVP-I) irrigation (OR 1.73; p = 0.046), and intraoperative posterior capsular rupture (PCR) with vitreous loss (OR 4.40; p = 0.034) showed statistically significant associations with endophthalmitis in the multivariate analysis. The rate of culture positivity was 44.2%, with Staphylococcus epidermidis being the most common organism isolated in China. More than 40% of the endophthalmitis cases were treated with a nonstandard antibiotics regimen, and only 32.7% of these had a visual acuity of better than 20/40. We concluded that the occurrence rate of acute-onset endophthalmitis following cataract surgery in Chinese small and medium-scale departments of ophthalmology lags behind the level of developed countries, as well as Chinese top eye centers. Overall, the use of 0.5% PVP-I irrigation seemed to be an effective measure to reduce the risk of the development of postoperative endophthalmitis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28094301 PMCID: PMC5240098 DOI: 10.1038/srep40776
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Occurrence rate of acute-onset postoperative endophthalmitis among different hospitals.
| Hospital | Region | General level of located city | Endophthal-mitis Cases (n) | Effective cataract surgeries (n) | Total cataract surgeries (n) | Occurrence rate per 100 (95% Confidence Interval) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EC | 3-tier | 3 | 902 | 2050 | 0.33 (0.00, 0.71) |
| 2 | EC | 4-tier | 1 | 386 | 1021 | 0.26 (0.00, 0.77) |
| 3 | EC | 4-tier | 1 | 710 | 1040 | 0.14 (0.00, 0.42) |
| 4 | EC | 4-tier | 1 | 606 | 711 | 0.17 (0.00, 0.49) |
| 5 | EC | 1-tier | 2 | 1250 | 1610 | 0.16 (0.00, 0.38) |
| 6 | EC | 1-tier | 1 | 2641 | 2713 | 0.04 (0.00, 0.11) |
| 7 | EC | 3-tier | 3 | 1458 | 3033 | 0.21 (0.00, 0.44) |
| 8 | EC | 2-tier | 1 | 2159 | 2503 | 0.05 (0.00, 0.14) |
| 9 | EC | 4-tier | 1 | 761 | 1174 | 0.13 (0.00, 0.39) |
| 10 | EC | 3-tier | 1 | 2922 | 2932 | 0.03 (0.00, 0.10) |
| 11 | SC | 3-tier | 6 | 3360 | 3487 | 0.18 (0.04, 0.32) |
| 12 | SC | 3-tier | 1 | 586 | 1348 | 0.17 (0.00, 0.50) |
| 13 | SC | 4-tier | 1 | 3145 | 3598 | 0.03 (0.00, 0.09) |
| 14 | SC | 3-tier | 1 | 995 | 3195 | 0.10 (0.00, 0.30) |
| 15 | NC | 1-tier | 2 | 3180 | 3400 | 0.06 (0.00, 0.15) |
| 16 | NC | 1-tier | 1 | 1880 | 1976 | 0.05 (0.00, 0.16) |
| 17 | NC | 3-tier | 2 | 1526 | 2014 | 0.13 (0.00, 0.31) |
| 18 | NC | 3-tier | 1 | 2319 | 3012 | 0.04 (0.00, 0.13) |
| 19 | NC | 1-tier | 1 | 846 | 920 | 0.12 (0.00, 0.35) |
| 20 | NC | 1-tier | 1 | 638 | 668 | 0.16 (0.00, 0.46) |
| 21 | NC | 4-tier | 1 | 1648 | 2480 | 0.06 (0.00, 0.18) |
| 22 | NC | 4-tier | 4 | 666 | 912 | 0.60 (0.01, 1.19) |
| 23 | NC | 2-tier | 2 | 1234 | 1371 | 0.16 (0.00, 0.39) |
| 24 | MWC | 3-tier | 1 | 1442 | 1847 | 0.07 (0.00, 0.21) |
| 25 | MWC | 2-tier | 1 | 578 | 765 | 0.17 (0.00, 0.51) |
| 26 | MWC | 4-tier | 1 | 486 | 526 | 0.21 (0.00, 0.61) |
| 27 | MWC | 3-tier | 6 | 1857 | 2476 | 0.32 (0.06, 0.58) |
| 28 | MWC | 4-tier | 1 | 1957 | 2129 | 0.05 (0.00, 0.15) |
| 29 | MWC | 3-tier | 1 | 3209 | 3549 | 0.03 (0.00, 0.09) |
| 30 | MWC | 4-tier | 2 | 838 | 932 | 0.24 (0.00, 0.57) |
| Total | — | — | 52 | 46185 | 59392 | 0.11 (0.08, 0.14) |
EC, East China; SC, South China; NC, North China; MWC, Midwest China.
Results of Bacterial Cultures in Patients With Endophthalmitis (n = 52).
| Bacterial Cultures/Causative Organisms | Eye (n) | Origin of Specimen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| aqueous humor (n) | Vitreous (n) | ||
| Negative bacterial cultures | 29 | 8 | 21 |
| Positive bacterial cultures | 23 | 7 | 16 |
| Gram-positive coagulase-negative | 13 | 5 | 8 |
| S. epidermidis | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| S. warneri | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| S. capitis | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Other Gram-positive | 7 | 2 | 5 |
| S. aureus | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| E. faecalis | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| P. acnes | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Gram-negative | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| P.aeruginosa | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Risk Factor for acute-onset postoperative Endophtalmitis after Cataract Surgery from a Multiple Logistic Regression Model.
| Risk factor | category | No. of endophthalmitis cases | No. of Effective Cataract Surgeries | Occurrence rate per 100 (95% Confidence Interval) | Multivariate OR (95% Confidence Interval) | p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | <60 | 9 | 9624 | 0.094(0.086, 0.101) | Reference | 0.889 | |||
| 60–69 | 19 | 15122 | 0.126(0.119, 0.133) | 1.34(0.61, 2.97) | |||||
| 70–79 | 17 | 15773 | 0.108(0.101, 0.114) | 1.15(0.51, 2.59) | |||||
| ≥80 | 7 | 5666 | 0.124(0.112, 0.135) | 1.32(0.49, 3.55) | |||||
| Gender | Male | 20 | 24316 | 0.082(0.078, 0.087) | Reference | 0.199 | |||
| Female | 32 | 21869 | 0.146(0.140, 0.152) | 1.44(0.82, 2.52) | |||||
| hospital | CSV/Y | <500 | 17 | 8335 | 0.204(0.193, 0.216) | 2.21*(1.24, 3.94) | 0.006 | ||
| ≥500 | 35 | 37850 | 0.093(0.089, 0.096) | Reference | |||||
| Geographic pattern | EC | 9 | 8086 | 0.111(0.117, 0.134) | 1.02(0.45, 2.34) | 0.977 | |||
| SC | 15 | 13795 | 0.109(0.102, 0.116) | Reference | |||||
| NC | 15 | 13937 | 0.108(0.101, 0.114) | 0.99(0.48, 2.03) | |||||
| MWC | 13 | 10367 | 0.125(0.117, 0.134) | 1.15(0.55, 2.43) | |||||
| General level of located city | 1-tier | 8 | 10435 | 0.077(0.070, 0.083) | Reference | 0.627 | |||
| 2-tier | 4 | 3971 | 0.101(0.088, 0.113) | 1.31(0.40, 4.37) | |||||
| 3-tier | 26 | 20576 | 0.126(0.120, 0.132) | 1.65(0.75, 3.65) | |||||
| 4-tier | 14 | 11203 | 0.125(0.117, 0.133) | 1.63(0.68, 3.89) | |||||
| Type of surgery | Phaco | 47 | 40848 | 0.115(0.111, 0.119) | 0.81(0.32, 2.05) | 0.662 | |||
| ECCE | 5 | 5337 | 0.094(0.083, 0.104) | Reference | |||||
| Type of incision | Clear corneal | 37 | 30310 | 0.122(0.117, 0.127) | Reference | 0.718 | |||
| limber tunnel | 7 | 7679 | 0.091(0.083, 0.100) | 0.75(0.33, 1.68) | |||||
| scleral tunnel | 8 | 8196 | 0.098(0.089, 0.106) | 0.80(0.37,1.72) | |||||
| Place of surgery | Inpatient | 51 | 43326 | 0.118(0.114, 0.122) | Reference | 0.201 | |||
| Outpatient | 1 | 2859 | 0.035(0.026, 0.044) | 0.30(0.04, 2.15) | |||||
| 0.5% PVP-I | absence | 25 | 16123 | 0.155(0.148, 0.163) | 1.73*(1.01, 2.98) | 0.046 | |||
| use | 27 | 30062 | 0.090(0.086, 0.094) | Reference | |||||
| PCR | Yes | 3 | 1625 | 0.185(0.160, 0.209) | 1.68(0.52, 5.40) | 0.614 | |||
| No | 49 | 44560 | 0.110(0.106, 0.114) | Reference | |||||
| PCR with vitreous loss | Yes | 3 | 623 | 0.482(0.430, 0.533) | 4.40*(1.34 14.14) | 0.034 | |||
| No | 49 | 44560 | 0.110(0.106, 0.114) | Reference | |||||
| PCR without vitreous loss | Yes | 0 | 1002 | 0.000 (0.000, 0.000) | — | 0.550 | |||
| No | 49 | 44560 | 0.110(0.106, 0.114) | ||||||
PVP-I, povidone iodine; CSV/Y, cataract surgery volume/year; Phaco, phacoemulsification; PCR, posterior capsular rupture.
EC, East China; SC, South China; NC, North China; MWC, Midwest China.
*Statistically significant P value (<0.05).
Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with achieving a final BCVA of 20/70 or better.
| Β Coefficient | p-value | Exp of Β | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phacoemulsification | 2.830 | 0.047 | 16.945 | 1.037, 276.832 |
| Presenting visual acuity ≥20/1000 | 2.007 | 0.035 | 7.074 | 1.153, 43.413 |
| Proper antibiotics | 1.956 | 0.01 | 7.439 | 1.632, 33.907 |
| Constant | −4.345 |
Exp, exponentiation; CI, Confidence Interval.
Infection prophylaxes of 30 hospitals.
| Hospital | Lash trimming | 0.5% PVP-I solution application | Antibiotics in irrigating solutions | Subconjunctival antibiotics | Ophthalmic ointment application |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | − | + | − | − | 0.3% tobramycin |
| 2 | + | − | − | − | 0.3% tobramycin |
| 3 | + | + | − | − | 0.3% tobramycin |
| 4 | + | − | − | − | − |
| 5 | − | + | − | − | 0.3% tobramycin |
| 6 | − | + | − | − | 0.3% tobramycin |
| 7 | − | + | − | − | 0.3% tobramycin |
| 8 | + | + | − | − | − |
| 9 | + | − | − | − | 0.3% tobramycin |
| 10 | − | + | − | − | 0.3% tobramycin |
| 11 | + | − | Tobramycin 16 mg/l | Tobramycin 4 mg/0.1 ml | 0.3% tobramycin |
| 12 | − | − | Getamicin 8 mg/l | Tobramycin 4 mg/0.1 ml | 0.3% tobramycin |
| 13 | − | + | − | − | 0.3% tobramycin |
| 14 | − | + | − | − | 0.3% tobramycin |
| 15 | − | − | − | − | 0.3% tobramycin |
| 16 | + | + | − | Tobramycin 4 mg/0.1 ml | 0.3% tobramycin |
| 17 | + | − | − | − | 0.3% tobramycin |
| 18 | + | + | − | − | 0.3% tobramycin |
| 19 | − | − | Getamicin 8 mg/l | − | − |
| 20 | − | + | − | Tobramycin 4 mg/0.1 ml | − |
| 21 | + | − | − | − | − |
| 22 | + | − | − | − | 0.3% tobramycin |
| 23 | − | − | − | − | 0.3% tobramycin |
| 24 | − | + | − | − | 0.3% tobramycin |
| 25 | − | + | − | − | 0.3% tobramycin |
| 26 | + | − | − | − | 0.3% tobramycin |
| 27 | − | + | − | − | 0.3% tobramycin |
| 28 | + | + | − | − | − |
| 29 | − | + | − | − | 0.3% tobramycin |
| 30 | − | − | − | − | 0.3% tobramycin |
PVP-I, povidone-iodine.