Erinn T Rhodes1, Richard E Boles2, Kimberly Chin3, Amy Christison4, Elizabeth Getzoff Testa5, Kimberly Guion6, Mary Jane Hawkins7, Carter R Petty3, Bethany Sallinen Gaffka8, Melissa Santos9, Laura Shaffer10, Jared Tucker11, Sarah E Hampl12. 1. 1 Division of Endocrinology, Boston Children's Hospital , Boston, MA. 2. 2 Children's Hospital Colorado , Aurora, CO. 3. 3 Clinical Research Center , Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA. 4. 4 Children's Hospital of Illinois , Peoria, IL. 5. 5 Mt. Washington Pediatric Hospital , Baltimore, MD. 6. 6 Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, OR. 7. 7 Children's Hospital and Medical Center , Omaha, NE. 8. 8 Pediatric Comprehensive Weight Management Center, University of Michigan Health System , Ann Arbor, MI. 9. 9 Connecticut Children's Medical Center , Hartford, CT. 10. 10 University of Virginia , Charlottesville, VA. 11. 11 Helen DeVos Children's Hospital , Grand Rapids, MI. 12. 12 Pediatrics and Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyles & Nutrition , Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Attrition in pediatric weight management negatively impacts treatment outcomes. A potentially modifiable contributor to attrition is unmet family expectations. This study aimed to evaluate the association between adolescent and parent/guardian treatment expectations and attrition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, nonrandomized, uncontrolled, single-arm pilot trial was conducted among 12 pediatric weight management programs in the Children's Hospital Association's FOCUS on a Fitter Future collaborative. Parents/guardians and adolescents completed an expectations/goals survey at their initial visit, with categories including healthier food/drinks, physical activity/exercise, family support/behavior, and weight management goals. Attrition was assessed at 3 months. RESULTS: From January to August 2013, 405 parents/guardians were recruited and reported about their children (203 adolescents, 202 children <12 years). Of the 203 adolescents, 160 also self-reported. Attrition rate was 42.2% at 3 months. For adolescents, greater interest in family support/behavior skills was associated with decreased odds of attrition at 3 months [odds ratio (OR) 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-0.98, p = 0.04]. The more discordant the parent/adolescent dyad responses in this category, the higher the odds of attrition at 3 months (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.04-1.78, p = 0.02). Weight loss was an important weight management goal for both adolescents and parents. For adolescents with this goal, the median weight-loss goal was 50 pounds. Attrition was associated with adolescent weight-loss goals above the desired median (50% above the median vs. 28% below the median, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Assessing initial expectations may help tailor treatment to meet families' needs, especially through focus on family-based change and realistic goal setting. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01753063.
BACKGROUND: Attrition in pediatric weight management negatively impacts treatment outcomes. A potentially modifiable contributor to attrition is unmet family expectations. This study aimed to evaluate the association between adolescent and parent/guardian treatment expectations and attrition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, nonrandomized, uncontrolled, single-arm pilot trial was conducted among 12 pediatric weight management programs in the Children's Hospital Association's FOCUS on a Fitter Future collaborative. Parents/guardians and adolescents completed an expectations/goals survey at their initial visit, with categories including healthier food/drinks, physical activity/exercise, family support/behavior, and weight management goals. Attrition was assessed at 3 months. RESULTS: From January to August 2013, 405 parents/guardians were recruited and reported about their children (203 adolescents, 202 children <12 years). Of the 203 adolescents, 160 also self-reported. Attrition rate was 42.2% at 3 months. For adolescents, greater interest in family support/behavior skills was associated with decreased odds of attrition at 3 months [odds ratio (OR) 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-0.98, p = 0.04]. The more discordant the parent/adolescent dyad responses in this category, the higher the odds of attrition at 3 months (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.04-1.78, p = 0.02). Weight loss was an important weight management goal for both adolescents and parents. For adolescents with this goal, the median weight-loss goal was 50 pounds. Attrition was associated with adolescent weight-loss goals above the desired median (50% above the median vs. 28% below the median, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Assessing initial expectations may help tailor treatment to meet families' needs, especially through focus on family-based change and realistic goal setting. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01753063.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Keeley J Pratt; David N Collier; Nicole L Walton; Suzanne Lazorick; Angela L Lamson Journal: Fam Syst Health Date: 2015-01-19 Impact factor: 1.950
Authors: Kyung E Rhee; Cynthia W De Lago; Tonya Arscott-Mills; Supriya D Mehta; Renee' Krysko Davis Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Elsie M Taveras; Richard Marshall; Mona Sharifi; Earlene Avalon; Lauren Fiechtner; Christine Horan; John Orav; Sarah N Price; Thomas Sequist; Daniel Slater Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2015-09-30 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Robert J Kuczmarski; Cynthia L Ogden; Shumei S Guo; Laurence M Grummer-Strawn; Katherine M Flegal; Zuguo Mei; Rong Wei; Lester R Curtin; Alex F Roche; Clifford L Johnson Journal: Vital Health Stat 11 Date: 2002-05
Authors: Mona Sharifi; Gareth Marshall; Roberta E Goldman; Courtney Cunningham; Richard Marshall; Elsie M Taveras Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2015-06-22
Authors: Max P Cote; Terri Byczkowski; Uma Kotagal; Shelley Kirk; Meg Zeller; Stephen Daniels Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 2.038
Authors: Leslie J Heinberg; Eve M Kutchman; Nathan A Berger; Sarah A Lawhun; Leona Cuttler; Rita C Seabrook; Sarah M Horwitz Journal: Clin Pediatr (Phila) Date: 2009-06-01 Impact factor: 1.168
Authors: Ineke M Pit-Ten Cate; Hanen Samouda; Ulrike Schierloh; Julien Jacobs; Jean Francois Vervier; Saverio Stranges; Marie Lise Lair; Carine de Beaufort Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-09-03 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Jennifer Cohen; Shirley Alexander; Michelle Critekos; Sarah P Garnett; Alison J Hayes; Tim Shaw; Kyra A Sim; Louise A Baur Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Kanika Bowen-Jallow; Omar Nunez-Lopez; Alex Wright; Erika Fuchs; Mollie Ahn; Elizabeth Lyons; Daniel Jupiter; Lindsey Berry; Oscar Suman; Ravi S Radhakrishnan; Andrea M Glaser; Deborah I Thompson Journal: J Obes Date: 2021-01-07
Authors: Laura M Kinlin; Stephan M Oreskovich; Raluca Dubrowski; Geoff D C Ball; Melanie Barwick; Elizabeth Dettmer; Jess Haines; Jill Hamilton; Theresa H M Kim; Marie Klaassen; Paola Luca; Jonathon L Maguire; Myla E Moretti; Elaine Stasiulis; Alene Toulany; Catherine S Birken Journal: Child Obes Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 2.867
Authors: Elizabeth Prout Parks; Reneé H Moore; Ziyi Li; Chanelle T Bishop-Gilyard; Andrew R Garrett; Douglas L Hill; Yasmeen P Bruton; David B Sarwer Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2018-03-19
Authors: M Kebbe; A Farmer; M P Dyson; S D Scott; T L F McHugh; S Lappa; H Rajani; T Ladha; B Islam; L Jacoby; F Nasir; K Talwar; J L Wincott; M Zhang; G D C Ball Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2019-12-18