Literature DB >> 28091873

Prediction of left ventricular contractile recovery using tissue Doppler strain and strain rate measurements at rest in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Ihab M Abdelgawwad1, Ahmed A Al Hawary2, Hanan M Kamal2, Layla M Al Maghawry3.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the ability of tissue Doppler (TD) deformation analysis at rest to predict left ventricular contractile recovery in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This prospective cohort enrolled 67 patients with segmental wall motion abnormality. Assessment of each segment was performed at rest and during low dose Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) using a 4 point scoring system, TD peak systolic strain (PSS) and peak systolic strain rate (PSSR). The study followed up the patients for contractile improvement after 6 months of successful PCI by echocardiography. Of a 319 dysfunctional segments, 155 (49%) showed contractile recovery and 164 (51%) did not. PSS and PSSR at rest were significantly higher in recovered segments compared to segments without recovery (PSS: -7.27 ± 0.8 Vs. -6.14 ± 0.7%, PSSR: -0.34 ± 0.13 Vs. -0.24 ± 0.1/s. p < 0.0001 both). Similarly, both parameters were significantly higher in the contractile recovery group at follow up (p 0.001). Resting PSSR as well as PSS and PSSR during DSE were significant independent predictors of contractile recovery (p < 0.001 each). For predicting segmental contractile recovery, resting PSSR with a -0.31/s cut-off point had 76% sensitivity and 59% specificity (AUC 0.74), DSE qualitative viability assessment had a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 77%, DSE PSS with a cut-off point of -9.1% had 74% sensitivity and 63% specificity (AUC 0.77) and DSE PSSR with a cut-off point of -0.72/s had 78% sensitivity and 77% specificity (AUC 0.81). Resting PSSR is a modest predictor of segmental contractile recovery after PCI while PSSR during DSE has a comparable diagnostic performance to subjective wall motion scoring. Recovered segments show improvement of deformation parameters after PCI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contractile recovery; Deformation; Strain; Strain rate; Tissue Doppler; Viability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28091873     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-016-1048-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  18 in total

Review 1.  Strain and strain rate imaging: a new clinical approach to quantifying regional myocardial function.

Authors:  George R Sutherland; Giovanni Di Salvo; Piet Claus; Jan D'hooge; Bart Bijnens
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.251

2.  Differentiation of subendocardial and transmural infarction using two-dimensional strain rate imaging to assess short-axis and long-axis myocardial function.

Authors:  Jonathan Chan; Lizelle Hanekom; Chiew Wong; Rodel Leano; Goo-Yeong Cho; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Identification of viable myocardium in acute anterior infarction using duration of systolic lengthening by tissue Doppler strain: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Trond Vartdal; Eirik Pettersen; Thomas Helle-Valle; Erik Lyseggen; Kai Andersen; Hans-Jørgen Smith; Lars Aaberge; Otto A Smiseth; Thor Edvardsen
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  Automated analysis of myocardial deformation at dobutamine stress echocardiography: an angiographic validation.

Authors:  Charlotte Bjork Ingul; Asbjorn Stoylen; Stig A Slordahl; Rune Wiseth; Malcolm Burgess; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Tissue Doppler and innovative myocardial-deformation imaging techniques for assessment of myocardial viability.

Authors:  Rainer Hoffmann
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Myocardial viability testing and impact of revascularization on prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin C Allman; Leslee J Shaw; Rory Hachamovitch; James E Udelson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-04-03       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Assessment of myocardial viability at dobutamine echocardiography by deformation analysis using tissue velocity and speckle-tracking.

Authors:  Manish Bansal; Leanne Jeffriess; Rodel Leano; Julie Mundy; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-02

8.  Strain rate dobutamine echocardiography for prediction of recovery after revascularization in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Antonio Vitarelli; Teresa Montesano; Carlo Gaudio; Ysabel Conde; Ester Cimino; Ilaria D'angeli; Simona D'orazio; Simona Stellato; Daniela Battaglia; Viviana Padella; Fiorella Caranci; Massimo Ciancamerla; Angelo Domenico Di Nicola; Giuseppe Ronga
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 9.  Tissue Doppler imaging a new prognosticator for cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Cheuk-Man Yu; John E Sanderson; Thomas H Marwick; Jae K Oh
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  Assessment of myocardial viability: comparison of echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the current era.

Authors:  David R Tomlinson; Harald Becher; Joseph B Selvanayagam
Journal:  Heart Lung Circ       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 2.975

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Identifying and Managing Hibernating Myocardium: What's New and What Remains Unknown?

Authors:  Matthew J Ryan; Divaka Perera
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2018-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.