Literature DB >> 18222726

Assessment of myocardial viability: comparison of echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the current era.

David R Tomlinson1, Harald Becher, Joseph B Selvanayagam.   

Abstract

Detecting viable myocardium, whether hibernating or stunned, is of clinical significance in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Echocardiographic assessments of myocardial thickening and endocardial excursion during dobutamine infusion provide a highly specific marker for myocardial viability, but with relatively less sensitivity. The additional modalities of myocardial contrast echocardiography and tissue Doppler have recently been proposed to provide further, quantitative measures of myocardial viability assessment. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has become popular for the assessment of myocardial viability as it can assess cardiac function, volumes, myocardial scar, and perfusion with high-spatial resolution. Both 'delayed enhancement' CMR and dobutamine stress CMR have important roles in the assessment of patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy. This article reviews the recent advances in both echocardiography and CMR for the clinical assessment of myocardial viability. It attempts to provide a pragmatic approach toward the patient-specific assessment of this important clinical problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18222726     DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2007.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung Circ        ISSN: 1443-9506            Impact factor:   2.975


  10 in total

1.  Prediction of left ventricular contractile recovery using tissue Doppler strain and strain rate measurements at rest in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Ihab M Abdelgawwad; Ahmed A Al Hawary; Hanan M Kamal; Layla M Al Maghawry
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  The role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging following acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Dennis T L Wong; James D Richardson; Rishi Puri; Adam J Nelson; Angela G Bertaso; Karen S L Teo; Matthew I Worthley; Stephen G Worthley
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Non-invasive cardiac imaging technologies for the assessment of myocardial viability: a summary of evidence-based analyses.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-07-01

4.  Acute myocarditis in a rat model: late gadolinium enhancement with histopathological correlation.

Authors:  Huedayi Korkusuz; Philip Esters; Nagy Naguib; N-E Nour Eldin; Sebastian Lindemayr; Frank Huebner; Ahmed Koujan; Reinhold Bug; Hanns Ackermann; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Prevalence of scarred and dysfunctional myocardium in patients with heart failure of ischaemic origin: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  Christos V Bourantas; Nikolay P Nikitin; Huan P Loh; Elena I Lukaschuk; Nassar Sherwi; Ramesh de Silva; Ann C Tweddel; Mohamed F Alamgir; Kenneth Wong; Sanjay Gupta; Andrew L Clark; John Gf Cleland
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 6.  Non-invasive imaging in detecting myocardial viability: Myocardial function versus perfusion.

Authors:  Iqbal A Elfigih; Michael Y Henein
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2014-10-18

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of myocardial viability: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-07-01

8.  Positron emission tomography for the assessment of myocardial viability: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-07-01

9.  Myocardial viability: what we knew and what is new.

Authors:  Adel Shabana; Ayman El-Menyar
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 1.866

10.  Accuracy of myocardial viability imaging by cardiac MRI and PET depending on left ventricular function.

Authors:  Peter Hunold; Heinz Jakob; Raimund Erbel; Jörg Barkhausen; Christina Heilmaier
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.