Literature DB >> 28090466

Microbiome-Linked Crosstalk in the Gastrointestinal Exposome towards Host Health and Disease.

Yuseok Moon1.   

Abstract

The gastrointestinal exposome represents the integration of all xenobiotic components and host-derived endogenous components affecting the host health, disease progression and ultimately clinical outcomes during the lifespan. The human gut microbiome as a dynamic exposome of commensalism continuously interacts with other exogenous exposome as well as host sentineling components including the immune and neuroendocrine circuit. The composition and diversity of the microbiome are established on the basis of the luminal environment (physical, chemical and biological exposome) and host surveillance at each part of the gastrointestinal lining. Whereas the chemical exposome derived from nutrients and other xenobiotics can influence the dynamics of microbiome community (the stability, diversity, or resilience), the microbiomes reciprocally alter the bioavailability and activities of the chemical exposome in the mucosa. In particular, xenobiotic metabolites by the gut microbial enzymes can be either beneficial or detrimental to the host health although xenobiotics can alter the composition and diversity of the gut microbiome. The integration of the mucosal crosstalk in the exposome determines the fate of microbiome community and host response to the etiologic factors of disease. Therefore, the network between microbiome and other mucosal exposome would provide new insights into the clinical intervention against the mucosal or systemic disorders via regulation of the gut-associated immunological, metabolic, or neuroendocrine system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastrointestinal exposome; Gastrointestinal immunity and inflammation; Microbiota; Xenobiotic metabolism

Year:  2016        PMID: 28090466      PMCID: PMC5234420          DOI: 10.5223/pghn.2016.19.4.221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr        ISSN: 2234-8840


INTRODUCTION

Total human cells in the body (1013) are outnumbered by bacterial cells as the human microbiome (1014). This dominant player with the endogenous host factors can be influenced by foodborne factors including dietary components, infective agents and xenobiotic including drugs and toxins, linked to diverse pathophysiological events including inflammation, carcinogenesis, metabolic syndromes, and neurological outcomes. The gastrointestinal mucosa shows typical microbiological and environmental features. From the proximal to the distal part of intestine, the oxygen levels are dramatically decreased, resulting in the dominancy of anaerobic microbes in the colon. Moreover, facultative players such as Bacterodetes burn out oxygen, attenuating the detrimental actions of oxygen species against the obligate anaerobes including commensal Clostria. There are two critical points for acidic environment in the human gut. One is the gastric cell-derived production of acids as a disinfectant, leading the drop in pH, but the pancreatic bicarbonate attenuate the acidity and the subsequent luminal fluid get more basic from the duodenum. The next drop in pH of the intestinal lumen is facilitated by outgrowing of fermentative microbes from the cecum, releasing out acidic organic metabolites such as short chain fatty acids (SCFAs). In response to oxygen tension and acidity, the composition of microbes can be differentially regulated at each segment of the gut lining. Along the dynamic features of fluid acidity and oxygen content in the gut lumen, nutritional components also affect the gut microbial diversity and stability via their acute and chronic actions. Since the simple sugars released form the carbohydrate degradation are easily consumed by the microbes in the proximal part of the gut, the lower lining of the gut are in short of the simple sugars and the remaining complex carbohydrates are utilized by fermenting anaerobes which dominate in the colon. Since the small intestinal lumen is generally more acidic environment with higher levels of oxygen, bile salts, and antimicrobial peptides than the colon lumen, simple sugar-favoring facultative anaerobes such as phyla Firmicutes (segmented filamentous bacteria [SFB] and Lactobacillaceae) and Proteobacteria (Enterobacteriaceae and Helicobacter spp.) can dominate in this proximal intestine. In contrast, the colon nutritional environment is favored by poly-saccharide-utilizing anaerobes such as phyla Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria (Bifidobacteriaceae), and Firmicutes (Clostridia). Moreover, nutrients and mucosal microbiomes are crucial modulators of gut sentinels including the mucosal immune systems and the intestinal neuroendocrine circuit. Foodborne factors can influence the composition and diversity of gut microorganisms, all of which impacts the immune and neuroendocrine responses in the gut via the various types of cytokines, hormones, and other messenger molecules. Moreover, the gastrointestinal immune sentineling signals are intimately linked with the neuroendocrine sentineling systems. Many of metabolic, inflammatory, and oncogenic disorders are due to the disruption of the two sentineling systems against nutrients and microbial community in the gut. The present review will address the features and networks of the gastrointestinal mucosal exposome to provide insights into the future intervention against mucosal diseases and mucosa-associated systemic diseases.

FEATURES OF STABILITY, DIVERSITY, FUNCTIONAL REDUNDANCY, AND RESILIENCE OF GUT MICROBIOME IN RESPONSE TO MUCOSAL EXPOSOME

The gastrointestinal exposome represents the integral of gut luminal exposure to both exogenous and endogenous factors in the host during the whole lifespan. From the birth, humans receive series of microbial population which collectively forms ecosystem of human microbiome and sometimes can be disturbed by both internal and external factors. The host interaction with microbiome is not a static, but rather dynamic with time. These mucosal disturbance may be stabilized, but which means the ecosystem reached the stable equilibrium states and any future stochastic disturbances can produce another stable state with dynamic changes in the community. The stable human microbiome can be classified into three enterotypes based on the stable distinct host–microbial nutritional symbiotic states characterized by a relatively high representation of Bacteroides, Prevotella or Ruminococcus [12]. Using these enterotypes, microbiome-based nutritional or drug metabolism can be estimated and clinically useful to prevent idiosyncratic hypersensitivity to food and drugs, and metabolic activation-induced toxicity [3]. Moreover, nutritional recommendation could be individually selected based on personal enterotypes to control the metabolism-linked disorders such as hypercholesterolemia, diabetes and obesity [4]. In response to dietary mucosal exposome, resilience of microbiome can be developed. The degree of resilience is the amount of stress or perturbation that a system can tolerate the changes to a different equilibrium stable state [5]. The species diversity is crucial for maintaining conferring resilience since species-rich communities containing microorganisms efficiently utilizing the limiting resources are less susceptible to invasion by different species specialized to potentially use the limiting resource. In addition, functional diversity is also important to keep the microbiome resilience. Human gut-adapted bacteria are prone to show functional redundancy even though they are phylogenetically disparate [6]. For instance, in response to an X component, a previously rare X-metabolizing microbe can be abundant to replace the niche that had been dominated by a microorganism with higher aversion to X, which indicates the community keeps the stable condition with high resilience although phylogenetically typical groups are missing in response to some stressors. The representative xenobiotic components in the mucosal exposome include drugs, nutrients and other adverse factors such as foodborne pathogens, biological toxins and other synthetic contaminants. The gastrointestinal exposome is the integration of the external components with all mucosal microbiome which function in both the gut physiology and pathology during the entire lifespan [78]. The homeostatic mucosal network would contribute to the stable equilibrium of the microbiome and host integrity. For instance, a high-fat diet (HFD) can change the dominancy and diversity of the intestinal microbiota, sometimes independent of status of host disease. HFD reduces the proportion of phylum Bacteroidetes and increases the proportions of phylum Proteobacteria [9]; whereas high-fiber containing food, such as important non-digestible plant carbohydrates, increases the proportion of Firmicutes bacteria [10]. In addition to the nutritional regulation, host-derived defense molecules can determine the characteristic microbiome profile. For example, some of gut microbes can utilize mucosal mucins and a microbial preference for the complex glycan of mucin can promote the growth of a number of mucin-degrading bacteria, which may facilitate microbial translocation to lamina propria and circulatory system [11]. The mucosal exposome-associated mucosal disruption can result in various types of human diseases and the following sections will address the mucosal exposome-disrupted or –promoted human health, based on dynamic gastrointestinal interactions between food components, the gut microbiota, and host responses. The crosstalk occurring in the microbiome-linked gastrointestinal exposome would provide new insight into disease progression and its intervention. Various types of mucosal diseases are associated with the impaired tolerance to gut commensal bacteria [1213]. For example, patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are likely to have abnormal changes in gut microbial composition (dysbiosis). Technically through the automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis, terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms, and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, the intestinal microbial diversity in IBD patients may be decreased [1415]. In addition to the diversity, the richness index of the gut bacterial species is also reduced in the IBD patients. As a potent etiological factor of chronic colitis including IBD, exposure to ribosome-inactivating foodborne toxins (ribotoxins) such as trichothecene mycotoxins, ricin and shiga toxins has been known to cause severe intestinal inflammatory disorders [16]. Although the gut microbes can alter the binding and toxicity of the ribotoxins [1718], the ribotoxins reciprocally can increase the intestinal composition of aerobic bacteria including aerobic mesophilic bacteria and the richness of gut microbiome in the animal model [1920], which is a similar pattern of microbial dysbiosis in gut of IBD patients.

GUT MICROBIOME-INDUCED METABOLITES AND THEIR ACTIONS

Gut microbiota can interact with the chemical exposome in four ways. As described in the previous section, the chemical exposome can alter the composition, diversity and their biological activity of the gut microbiota. In particular, some of chemical xenobiotics can interfere with the metabolic activity of the microbiota-derived drug metabolism. Reciprocally, the gut microbiota can metabolize a variety of chemical xenobiotics directly upon ingestion in the gastrointestinal lumen or after the conjugated metabolites via enterohepatic circulation. Most of non-polar xenobiotics would be easily absorbed from the gut lumen and then transported to the liver for detoxification via the portal vein. The hepatic metabolic enzymes tends to oxidize the absorbed chemical xenobiotics, or catalyze the conjugation reactions with endogenous functional groups including glucuronic acid, sulfate, or glutathione. The hepatic metabolites can circulate or can be excreted in the bile and re-enter the intestinal lumen where the gut microbiota-mediated metabolism of the hepatic metabolites can take place. Some of gut microbiota produces extensive pools of enzymes including cytochrome p450 (CYP), catalyzing oxidative metabolism of foodborne components and oral medicines [21]. For instance, intestinal Eubacterium aerofaciens, Desulfomonas pigra, and Streptomyces coelicolor A3 isolated from human feces have CYP-like enzymes [2223]. However, most xenobiotic metabolisms by gut microbiota have the preferences to the de-conjugation and reduction of the hepatic xenobiotic metabolites, ultimately producing non-polar metabolites of lower molecular weight, which are readily reabsorbed from the gut barrier into the circulation. Therefore, microbiota-mediated de-conjugation of hepatic conjugated metabolites may lead to regeneration of the original chemical xenobiotics or new metabolites with either higher or lower toxicity. In the following sections, microbiota-mediated xenobiotic metabolism will be associated with modulation of gastrointestinal health or disorders such as inflammatory and oncogenic outcomes in the mucosa and circulation.

Short chain fatty acids

Dietary fibers are fermented into health-promoting components such as SCFAs by gut microbiota. Soluble elements of dietary fibers, such as pectin, gum, and mucilages, can be degraded into bioactive SCFAs, which are saturated aliphatic organic acids consisting of one to six carbons. Acetate (C2), propionate (C3), and butyrate (C4) are the most prevalent forms in the colon with a ratio of 60:20:20 (%) [2425]. Most of SCFAs (95%) produced in the cecum and large intestine are readily absorbed by the gut epithelia [24]. In particular, the proximal colon is the principal site for the conversion of indigestible fibers to SCFAs by phylum Bacteroidetes such as butyrate-producing Bacteroides spp. [24] and thus the distal parts of the colon with increase of pH are dominated by populations of acetate- and propionate-producing Bacteroides-related spp. [26]. However, fermentation of bacterial proteins and amino acids still occurs in the more distal parts of the colon by the support of the secondary proteolytic fermenters, secreting potentially toxic metabolites such as amines, phenolic compounds, and volatile sulfur compounds [26]. Biochemically, SCFA can partially inhibit histone deacetylase (HDAC), which increases immunological tolerance and anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer responses [272829]. Bacterial metabolite-sensing G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) also play regulatory functions in gastrointestinal inflammation and metabolic syndromes by changing leptin production, adiposity, and insulin secretion [30]. In particular, SCFAs induce peptide secretion via GPCR activation on entero-endocrine cells (EECs), suggesting that the gut microbiota-neuronal axis can modulate some of GPCR-linked functions such as nutrient sensing and energy balance [31]. Moreover, prebiotic application alters the production of the gut microbial SCFA, resulting in gut peptide secretion from EEC and subsequent host eating behavior [32]. For instance, prebiotics increase the abundance of Bifido-bacterium and Lactobacillus, as well as microbiota profiles skewing EEC differentiation and subsequently gut peptide production, ultimately increasing satiety response and decreasing energy intake, fat mass, and body weight. All of the information suggests the crucial regulation of food intake and maintenance of energy metabolism by microbiota and their metabolites including SCFAs [333435].

Gut microbial metabolites as ligands for aryl hydrocarbon receptor

In addition to some flavonoids and indoles from plant-derived foodstuffs such as cruciferous vegetables, gut microbial metabolites such as pigment phenazins, nephtoquinon phthlocol, and dihydroxynaphthoic acid can activate aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), a crucial nuclear receptor modulating expression of many genes that control immunity and inflammation [36]. Moreover, diet-derived tryptophan is metabolized by the microbiota (e.g., Lactobacilli) to indole-3-aldehyde, an AhR agonist. Intestinal indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase can catalyze the conversion of tryptophan to kynurenine, another AhR ligand [37]. This AhR modulation by gut bacterial metabolites could be a co-evolutionary strategy between gut commensal bacteria and host immune system since ligand-activated AhR is closely involved in mucosal immune tolerance, leading to shaping of the microbial community through the actions of regulatory T cells and interleukin 22, which facilitate the host protection against excessive inflammation and microbial infection [38]. However, chronic AhR activation is not always beneficial since it can allows transformed tumor cells to evade from the immune-mediated attack, particularly at late stages of tumorigenesis [3940]. Moreover, tryptophan metabolites, such as kynurenic acid and niacin, also interact with certain GPCRs as SCFAs do [30]. Bacterial metabolite-sensing GPCRs can be also involved in the regulatory action against gastrointestinal inflammation and metabolic syndromes. Taken together, microbiota metabolite-linked GPCRs, HDACs, or AhR could be promising targets of clinical intervention against many mucosal inflammatory, metabolic or oncogenic diseases.

Gut microbiota-derived detrimental metabolites

By contrast with the beneficial effects, gut microbiota-mediated metabolism of chemical xenobiotics could result in harmful complications. For instance, gut microbial metabolism of the dietary phosphatidylcholine (PC), such as choline, lecithin, trimethylamine (TMA) N-oxide, and betaine, pose potent risk of causing cardiovascular diseases [4142]. In addition to the PC, diet-derived L-carnitine can be metabolized into TMA by the gut microbiota [43]. TMA is further converted into TMA N-oxide (TMAO) by hepatic flavin monooxygenase or gut microbial enzymes. Along with TMA, TMAO is also an etiological factor of cardiovascular inflammatory disorders [3641]. Mechanistically, treatment with TMA or TMAO increase the activated macrophage and endothelial injuries in the blood vessel. Endogenous components can be transformed into detrimental metabolites by gut microbiota. For example, intestinal bacteria can convert the primary bile acids into the secondary bile acid metabolites such as deoxycholic acid and lithocholic acid which cause oxidative and nitrosative stress, resulting in genetic damages of enterocytes and gut inflammatory lesions including high levels of flat adenoma lesions and hyperplasia of Peyer's patches. Frequent and chronic mucosal exposure to the secondary bile acids thus can increase the genomic instability, chemoresistance and tumor progression [4445].

CONCLUSION

The composition and diversity of the microbiome are specified, depending on the mucosal exposome and host sentineling systems. The chemical exposome derived from nutrients and other xenobiotics may alter the microbiome community in terms of the stability, diversity, or functional redundancy. Reciprocally, the gut microbiomes provides critical sources for xenobiotic metabolism of the chemical exposome in the mucosa and hepatic metabolites from the enterohepatic circulation. Of note, xenobiotic metabolites by the gut microbial enzymes can be either beneficial or detrimental to the host health. Total integration of the crosstalk in the mucosal exposome would determines the fate of microbiome community and host response to the xenobiotics via regulation of the sentineling systems including immune and neuroendocrine tissues (Fig. 1). As the clinical implications, the disease progress can be assessed by reading out the mucosal biomarkers from the network between exposome and host. Moreover, the preventive or therapeutic intervention against the mucosal or systemic disorders may be performed by targeting at the crosstalk between microbiome and other mucosal exposome under the host sentineling system.
Fig. 1

Schematic networks of gastrointestinal niche. Mucosal xenobiotics are converted into beneficial or harmful metabolites by both host cells and gut microbes, which reciprocally influces the microbial community and host cell integrity. Gut microbes are continuously interplaying with the host sentinels such as immune and neuroendocrine systems.

  45 in total

Review 1.  Towards a 'cure' for IBD.

Authors:  Claudio Fiocchi
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 2.404

2.  Dominant and diet-responsive groups of bacteria within the human colonic microbiota.

Authors:  Alan W Walker; Jennifer Ince; Sylvia H Duncan; Lucy M Webster; Grietje Holtrop; Xiaolei Ze; David Brown; Mark D Stares; Paul Scott; Aurore Bergerat; Petra Louis; Freda McIntosh; Alexandra M Johnstone; Gerald E Lobley; Julian Parkhill; Harry J Flint
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  The SCFA butyrate stimulates the epithelial production of retinoic acid via inhibition of epithelial HDAC.

Authors:  Ronald Schilderink; Caroline Verseijden; Jurgen Seppen; Vanesa Muncan; Gijs R van den Brink; Tim T Lambers; Eric A van Tol; Wouter J de Jonge
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 4.052

4.  Intestinal microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease: friend of foe?

Authors:  Francesca Fava; Silvio Danese
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Comparative genome-wide association studies in mice and humans for trimethylamine N-oxide, a proatherogenic metabolite of choline and L-carnitine.

Authors:  Jaana Hartiala; Brian J Bennett; W H Wilson Tang; Zeneng Wang; Alexandre F R Stewart; Robert Roberts; Ruth McPherson; Aldons J Lusis; Stanley L Hazen; Hooman Allayee
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 8.311

6.  Microbial diversity of inflamed and noninflamed gut biopsy tissues in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Shadi Sepehri; Roman Kotlowski; Charles N Bernstein; Denis O Krause
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.325

7.  Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome.

Authors:  Manimozhiyan Arumugam; Jeroen Raes; Eric Pelletier; Denis Le Paslier; Takuji Yamada; Daniel R Mende; Gabriel R Fernandes; Julien Tap; Thomas Bruls; Jean-Michel Batto; Marcelo Bertalan; Natalia Borruel; Francesc Casellas; Leyden Fernandez; Laurent Gautier; Torben Hansen; Masahira Hattori; Tetsuya Hayashi; Michiel Kleerebezem; Ken Kurokawa; Marion Leclerc; Florence Levenez; Chaysavanh Manichanh; H Bjørn Nielsen; Trine Nielsen; Nicolas Pons; Julie Poulain; Junjie Qin; Thomas Sicheritz-Ponten; Sebastian Tims; David Torrents; Edgardo Ugarte; Erwin G Zoetendal; Jun Wang; Francisco Guarner; Oluf Pedersen; Willem M de Vos; Søren Brunak; Joel Doré; María Antolín; François Artiguenave; Hervé M Blottiere; Mathieu Almeida; Christian Brechot; Carlos Cara; Christian Chervaux; Antonella Cultrone; Christine Delorme; Gérard Denariaz; Rozenn Dervyn; Konrad U Foerstner; Carsten Friss; Maarten van de Guchte; Eric Guedon; Florence Haimet; Wolfgang Huber; Johan van Hylckama-Vlieg; Alexandre Jamet; Catherine Juste; Ghalia Kaci; Jan Knol; Omar Lakhdari; Severine Layec; Karine Le Roux; Emmanuelle Maguin; Alexandre Mérieux; Raquel Melo Minardi; Christine M'rini; Jean Muller; Raish Oozeer; Julian Parkhill; Pierre Renault; Maria Rescigno; Nicolas Sanchez; Shinichi Sunagawa; Antonio Torrejon; Keith Turner; Gaetana Vandemeulebrouck; Encarna Varela; Yohanan Winogradsky; Georg Zeller; Jean Weissenbach; S Dusko Ehrlich; Peer Bork
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  High-fat diet determines the composition of the murine gut microbiome independently of obesity.

Authors:  Marie A Hildebrandt; Christian Hoffmann; Scott A Sherrill-Mix; Sue A Keilbaugh; Micah Hamady; Ying-Yu Chen; Rob Knight; Rexford S Ahima; Frederic Bushman; Gary D Wu
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-08-23       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Postnatal prebiotic fibre intake mitigates some detrimental metabolic outcomes of early overnutrition in rats.

Authors:  Danielle T Reid; Lindsay K Eller; Jodi E Nettleton; Raylene A Reimer
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 5.614

10.  Tryptophan catabolites from microbiota engage aryl hydrocarbon receptor and balance mucosal reactivity via interleukin-22.

Authors:  Teresa Zelante; Rossana G Iannitti; Cristina Cunha; Antonella De Luca; Gloria Giovannini; Giuseppe Pieraccini; Riccardo Zecchi; Carmen D'Angelo; Cristina Massi-Benedetti; Francesca Fallarino; Agostinho Carvalho; Paolo Puccetti; Luigina Romani
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 31.745

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Advancing precision medicine with personalized drug screening.

Authors:  Kirill Gorshkov; Catherine Z Chen; Raisa E Marshall; Nino Mihatov; Yong Choi; Dac-Trung Nguyen; Noel Southall; Kevin G Chen; John K Park; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 2.  Role of Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns in Light of Modern Environmental Research: A Tautological Approach.

Authors:  Walter Gottlieb Land
Journal:  Int J Environ Res       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 3.  The role of gut microbiome and associated metabolome in the regulation of neuroinflammation in multiple sclerosis and its implications in attenuating chronic inflammation in other inflammatory and autoimmune disorders.

Authors:  Nicholas Dopkins; Prakash S Nagarkatti; Mitzi Nagarkatti
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 7.397

4.  Gut microbiome pattern in adolescents with functional gastrointestinal disease.

Authors:  Andrew R Nafarin; Badriul Hegar; Hikari A Sjakti; Yvan Vandenplas
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2019-02-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.