Literature DB >> 28090347

Depressive symptoms in women's midlife in relation to their body weight before, during and after childbearing years.

M Bliddal1, A Pottegård2, H Kirkegaard3, J Olsen4, T I A Sørensen5, E A Nohr6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine how weight and weight changes related to pregnancy were associated with depressive symptoms 11-16 years after childbirth.
METHOD: We followed 16,998 first-time mothers from the Danish National Birth Cohort up till 16 years after birth and estimated associations between depressive symptoms and pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) (kg m-2), weight changes in different time periods, and BMI-adjusted waist circumference 7 years after birth (WCBMI, cm). Depressive symptoms were estimated by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression 10-item scale. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: Compared with normal-weight, we found that underweight, overweight and obesity were associated with greater odds of depressive symptoms (1.29, 1.24 and 1.73, respectively). Compared with weight change ±1 BMI unit during the total follow-up period, greater odds for depressive symptoms were observed with weight loss (OR 1.14, 0.96-1.36) or gain of 2-2.99 kg m-2 (OR 1.11, 0.92-1.33) or gain of ≥3 kg m-2 (OR 1.68, 1.46-1.94). WCBMI > 2.2 cm was associated with greater odds of depressive symptoms (OR 1.16, 0.99-1.36) than waist circumference as predicted by BMI.
CONCLUSION: Low and high pre-pregnancy BMI, weight changes and WCBMI larger than predicted were associated with more depressive symptoms in midlife.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body mass index; body‐weight changes; depressive symptoms; maternal health

Year:  2016        PMID: 28090347      PMCID: PMC5192541          DOI: 10.1002/osp4.75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Sci Pract        ISSN: 2055-2238


Introduction

Obesity is a growing public health problem worldwide 1, also among women of childbearing age. In 2015, 27% of Danish women were overweight when entering pregnancy: of these, 12% were categorized as having obesity 2. The reported prevalence of mental illness is increasing, and it is estimated that mental disorders – primarily depression – account for 20% of the disease burden in the European Union 3. Obesity has been linked with depression, both in the general population 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and among new mothers 10, 11. Weight changes may also be associated with later depression, although evidence is inconsistent 8, 12, 13. For women, the childbearing period is characterized by steep weight gain during pregnancy followed by rapid weight loss. For some mothers, pregnancy induces a lasting weight gain, either as postpartum weight retention or as weight gain in early motherhood, possibly because of changes in lifestyle 14, 15, all of which increases the risk of later overweight or obesity 16, 17. Also, postpartum depression may influence long‐term obesity as depression may negatively affect the natural weight loss after childbirth 18. Both a woman's pre‐pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and these pregnancy‐related weight changes may be linked with depression through both physical and mental mechanisms such as dys‐regulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, inflammation, the metabolic syndrome, and poor self‐esteem and stigma 5, 19. Low pre‐pregnancy BMI and postpartum weight changes (both gain and loss) have been associated with long‐term risk of anxiety and depressive disorders leading to prescriptions of antidepressants or hospital diagnoses in the time up till 6 years postpartum 13. On the other hand, many women suffer from depressive symptoms 20, which might also lead to obesity and weight changes through altered lifestyle habits 19. Finally, pregnancy is associated with a change in body composition with an increase in adipose tissue in the visceral compartment 21. Abdominal fat is more metabolically active than fat tissue in general and have been associated with depression 4, 22, 23. Underlying factors could include unhealthy eating habits or increased levels of cytokines 4, 24, 25. This association has not been investigated in any of the previous studies. The aim of this study was to investigate if pre‐pregnancy BMI and body weight changes during and after years of childbearing relate to depressive symptoms in midlife, measured 11–16 years after a woman's first birth. Additionally, we studied if waist circumference (WC) adjusted for BMI (WCBMI) 7 years after childbirth, as an indicator for abdominal adiposity, was associated with depressive symptoms. We hypothesized that high pre‐pregnancy BMI, weight changes in the years of reproduction and beyond, and abdominal obesity were associated with the prevalence of depressive symptoms in mothers in midlife.

Methods

This study is based on the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC), which contains self‐reported and healthcare‐recorded information on health and lifestyle in pregnancy from 92,925 women 26, 27. The women were enrolled between 1996 and 2002 in early pregnancy by their general practitioner, and approximately 60% of the invited women accepted to participate. The women completed telephone interviews twice in pregnancy and at approximately 6 and 18 months postpartum. Detailed information on the DNBC can be found elsewhere 26, 27. Seven years after childbirth, the mothers were invited to complete a web‐based or mailed follow‐up questionnaire, which included information on weight and waist circumference. Finally, from January 2013 to January 2015, on average 14 years after childbirth, a follow‐up study was conducted on mothers focusing on mental, physical and occupational health. The women also provided information on weight parameters during their childbearing years and at the time of the follow‐up. We restricted the study to women who participated in the cohort with their first live birth and provided information on pre‐pregnancy BMI (n = 42,124) (Figure 1). Of these, 21,060 women (50.0%) replied to the Maternal Follow‐up questionnaire, and 18,349 (43.6%) had complete information on weight during the follow‐up period. We excluded 153 women (0.8%) who were pregnant at the time of the follow‐up. Also, we excluded 1,198 women (6.6%), who prior to the first pregnancy had a hospital diagnosis of any affective disorder (by ICD8 code 296 or ICD10 codes F30‐39) or reported to have suffered from any psychological condition before being enrolled in DNBC in order to identify a cohort of mentally healthy women at baseline. The final study population included 16,998 mothers.
Figure 1

Flowchart of the study population from the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC). BMI, body mass index.

Flowchart of the study population from the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC). BMI, body mass index.

Exposures and outcomes

While recognizing the complex, possibly bi‐directional, relations between body weight and depressive symptoms, we defined the body weight‐related variables as exposures and the depressive symptoms as outcomes for analytical purposes. We report statistical associations knowing that the direction of associations remain unclear and further studies on causal directions are needed. Pre‐pregnancy BMI was calculated from self‐reported pre‐pregnancy weight and height, which were obtained during the first interview in the DNBC at approximately the 17th week. The BMI were categorized according to the World Health Organization classification as underweight (<18.5 kg m−2), normal‐weight (18.5–24.99 kg m−2), overweight (25–29.99 kg m−2) and obesity (≥30 kg m−2) 28. Next, we identified weight changes in different periods (Figure 2). (i) Weight change across years of childbearing, defined as weight change from before the pregnancy leading to the first live birth until 12 months after the last live birth in the follow‐up period (childbearing‐related weight change); (ii) weight change after the childbearing period, defined as weight change from 12 months after the last live birth till the time of the follow‐up questionnaire (weight change after childbearing); and (iii) overall weight change, defined as weight change from prior to the pregnancy leading to the first live birth till the time of the follow‐up questionnaire (total weight change). BMI at the end of each time period were calculated from self‐reported weights in the Maternal Follow‐up questionnaire. For all periods, weight changes were calculated as differences between BMI values at the start and the end of the specific period, and categorized as weight loss (>1 kg m−2), unchanged weight (between −1.00 and 0.99 kg m−2), weight gain 1–1.99 kg m−2, weight gain 2–2.99 kg m−2 and finally weight gain ≥3 kg m−2 29. One BMI unit is equivalent to approximately 3 kg for a 168‐cm‐tall woman. Additionally, we categorized weight changes in three categories as those with the highest weight loss (10th percentile), those with the highest weight gain (90th percentile) and those with more moderate changes in weight (11–89th percentile).
Figure 2

Time line indicating time points for generation of weight change parameters.

Time line indicating time points for generation of weight change parameters. Finally, we included waist circumference (cm) adjusted for BMI (WCBMI, cm) as an exposure. In the 7‐year follow‐up questionnaire, women were instructed to measure WC at the narrowest point in centimetres with a mailed tape measure. We therefore excluded mothers with missing information on weight or WC from the 7‐years questionnaire as well as women with this measure affected by an on‐going or recent pregnancy (from conception through 12 months postpartum) for this analysis, leaving 11,290 (66.4%) women. As a measure of abdominal adiposity, we used the deviation from the value predicted by the BMI value estimated by the regression of WC on BMI. This measure indicates the variation in abdominal fatness that cannot be ascribed to variation in general adiposity measured by BMI 15, and even a woman with a low BMI can have positive values if her WC is larger than expected for her BMI. At the 7‐year follow‐up, the predicted waist circumference was 81.6 cm for a mean BMI at 7 years postpartum of 23.0 kg m−2, and it increased by 2.15 cm for each increase in BMI unit. These data were used both as continuous variables and as categorical variables (divided in three equally sized groups; <−2.5, −2.5–2.2 and >2.2 cm from the WC predicted by the BMI). The outcome measure ‘depressive symptoms’ was based on self‐reported data from the Maternal Follow‐up study, using the Center of Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Short (CES‐D10) 30. The participants answered 10 questions about their mental status within the last week prior to filling the questionnaire, and each answer was given a score between 0 (rarely) and 3 (most of the time/always). The maximum sum of scores was 30, and scores ≥10 indicated depressive symptoms 30. The CES‐D10 scale is a short version of the CES‐D scale 31 developed by Radloff in 1977 to measure depressive symptomatology in the general population 30. It has been found to be a reliable and valid instrument for detecting major depressive disorders 32. The short version of the scale has a good predictive accuracy compared with the full‐length version 31, 33, and with a cut‐off at 10, it has a high sensitivity for diagnostic performance 33, 34. Thus, although a score of 10 or above does not need to reflect a psychiatric diagnosis of depression, the cut‐off indicates more severe depressive symptoms.

Covariates

From the baseline interview, we had information about socio‐occupational status based on type of job or type of education if still attending school. Women in management or in jobs requiring higher education were categorized as ‘high’. Office workers, service worker, skilled manual workers and women in the military constituted the ‘middle’ category. The category ‘low’ included unskilled workers and unemployed women 35. From the interviews 6 and 18 months postpartum, we had information on total weeks of breastfeeding (<20, 20–39 and 40+ weeks). The Maternal Follow‐up questionnaire included information on smoking history, which was categorized as never, previous and current smokers. Information on parity at the end of follow‐up was included in the Maternal Follow‐up questionnaire, and was categorized as parity 1, 2 and 3+. Further, we adjusted for marital status (cohabitant/married or single) and place of residency (capital, cities >100,000 inhabitants or smaller cities/rural areas) at baseline. In relation to the index pregnancy (at approximately gestational week 30 and 6 months postpartum), 12,732 women in the study population had answered three questions on actual depressive symptoms from the Symptoms Checklist‐92 36, 37. Each of these could be answered with ‘no’ = 1, ‘a little’ = 2 and ‘a lot’ = 3. The scores of the three questions (range 3–9) were added up, and two groups were generated (women without depressive symptoms [sum <5] and women with depressive symptoms [sum ≥5] at the respective points in time). The cut‐off was population specific and identified 13.5% and 13.7% as having depressive symptoms in mid‐pregnancy and in early motherhood, respectively.

Statistical analysis

The prevalence of depressive symptoms and prevalence differences according to each category of exposures were calculated, and logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) for the association between pre‐pregnancy BMI, weight changes, WCBMI at 7 years postpartum and self‐reported depressive symptoms in midlife (CES‐D10 ≥ 10). We adjusted for age at beginning of the first pregnancy, socio‐occupational status, marital status and living area in pregnancy, as well as smoking history. In the analysis on weight change after the childbearing years and depressive symptoms, we included parity but not weight change in the previous time period. In the adjusted analyses of weight changes and depressive symptoms, we also included pre‐pregnancy BMI. Potential confounders were chosen a priori and assessed by use of directed acyclic graphs 38. As time in the cohort may potentially affect the estimates, we added an interaction term indicating weight change in a short or long period (defined by under/over median time in the cohort) to all covariates in the analysis. Results indicated no statistically significant difference in estimates (results not shown). We generated restricted cubic splines with six knots for the association between the selected weight parameters as continuous variables and depressive symptoms (Figure S1). Because some of these splines indicated U‐shaped associations, we also estimated the linear association between continuous weight changes in strata of women who lost or gained weight and women with positive and negative WCBMI and depressive symptoms (Table S1). The linear association between pre‐pregnancy BMI > 21 units and depressive symptoms were also estimated (Table S1). To adjust in part for reverse causation and to examine bi‐directionality, we repeated the analyses adjusted for depressive symptoms in the beginning of the period under study (in gestational week 30 and/or 6 months postpartum, respectively) in mothers who had given the information (N = 12,732) (Supplementary Table S2). Finally, to examine the robustness of the associations, we made the analyses with a CES‐D score cut‐off of 12 (Table S3). Results are presented as estimates with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Analyses were performed using stata 13.0 (StatCorp, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Of the 16,998 first‐time mothers in this study, 13.9% (n = 2,363) reported to have depressive symptoms at the time of the Maternal Follow‐up as indicated by a CES‐D10 score ≥ 10 with a median score of 13 points (interquartile range [IQR] 11–16 points). Using a cut‐off ≥12, 8.7% of mothers had depressive symptoms. Median age at maternal follow‐up was 42 years (IQR 40–45 years), and median time of follow‐up was 14.3 years (IQR 13.2–15.2 years). In the 10th percentile with the highest weight loss, the median loss was 2.4 kg m−2 (IQR 3.6–1.8 kg m−2), and in the 90th percentile with the highest gain, the median weight gain was 6.1 kg m−2 (IQR 5.2–7.7 kg m−2). Compared with women without depressive symptoms at the time of the Maternal Follow‐up, women with depressive symptoms were more likely to have a low socio‐occupational status, to smoke at the time of the Maternal Follow‐up, to be the mother of only one child, to have breastfed for a shorter period and to live alone (Table 1). Pre‐pregnancy BMI tended to be higher for women with lower socio‐occupational status and among current smokers. Total weight gain was lowest in women with high socio‐occupational status, never smokers and mothers, who had three or more children.
Table 1

Sample characteristics for all mothers and mothers with depressive symptoms in midlife from the Danish National Birth Cohort (n = 16,998)

Study populationBMI(IQR)WCIII(IQR)Depressive symptomsNo depressive symptoms
Study population16,998100.0%22.39(20.62–24.80)1.03(−0.00–2.54)2,36313.9%14,63586.1%
Age, median (IQR) years
At baseline28.0(25.9–30.6)28.1(25.7–30.9)28.0(25.9–30.5)
At end of follow‐up42.2(40.0–45.0)42.3(39.9–45.3)42.2(40.0–44.9)
Social status %
Low8425.0%22.85(20.57–26.22)1.63(0.00–3.59)1616.8%6814.7%
Middle5,35431.5%22.84(20.82–25.47)1.26(−0.00–2.99)81934.7%4,53531.0%
High10,47361.6%22.20(20.55–24.38)0.78(−0.32–2.21)1,31155.5%9,16262.6%
Smoking history %
Never smoker9,50155.9%22.32(20.58–24.80)1.00(−0.00–2.42)1,17349.6%8,32856.9%
Former smoker5,70733.6%22.32(20.62–24.61)1.06(−0.00–2.70)82935.1%4,87833.3%
Smoker1,4588.6%22.85(20.76–25.69)1.06(−0.37–3.01)31613.4%1,1427.8%
Children during reproductive period %
12,60815.3%22.60(20.76–25.43)1.19(0.00–2.90)42718.1%2,18114.9%
29,73157.2%22.41(20.66–24.80)1.03(−0.30–2.50)1,34857.0%8,38357.3%
3+4,65927.4%22.21(20.53–24.46)0.96(−0.29–2.42)58824.9%4,07127.8%
Habitant status
Married or cohabitant16,67198.1%22.39(20.62–24.80)1.01(−0.00–2.51)2,29497.1%14,37798.2%
Single3171.9%22.50(20.57–24.69)1.84(0.39–4.63)682.9%2491.7%
Living area
Capital2,89717.0%21.63(20.18–23.66)0.89(0.00–2.13)41317.5%2,48417.0%
City of >100,000 inhabitants2,58415.2%22.13(20.55–24.22)0.95(−0.33–2.34)32813.9%2,25615.4%
Smaller cities or rural areas11,51767.8%22.66(20.76–25.26)1.06(−0.00–2.70)1,62268.6%9,89567.6%
Breastfeeding
<20 weeks3,16118.6%23.24(21.08–26.40)1.21(−0.32–3.19)50921.5%2,65218.1%
20–39 weeks5,90834.8%22.27(20.57–24.51)0.97(−0.00–2.31)73831.2%5,17035.3%
40+ weeks3,62921.3%22.03(20.45–24.16)0.93(−0.00–2.31)46019.5%3,16921.7%
Time in intervals, median (IQR) y
Pre‐conception – 12 months after last birth4.9(3.7–6.9)4.9(3.6–7.0)4.9(3.8–6.9)
12 months after last birth – Maternal follow‐up9.1(7.1–10.9)9.2(7.1–11.1)9.1(7.1–10.9)
Pre‐conception – Maternal follow‐up14.3(13.2–15.2)14.5(13.4–15.3)14.3(13.2–15.2)
Anthropometrics
Pre‐pregnancy BMI, median (IQR) BMI units22.4(20.6–24.8)22.8(20.8–25.6)22.3(20.6–24.7)
Weight change I, median (IQR) BMI units0.7(−0.4–2.0)0.8(−0.4–2.4)0.7(−0.4–2.0)
Weight change II, median (IQR) BMI units0.4(−0.7–1.6)0.7(−0.7–2.2)0.3(−0.7–1.5)
Weight change III, median (IQR) BMI units1.0(−0.0–2.5)1.4(0.0–3.5)1.0(−0.0–2.4)
Waist circumference at 7 years, median (IQR) cm82.0(76.0–89.0)83.0(77.0–91.0)81.0(76.0–88.0)

Weight change I: weight change from prior to conception of the first child till 12 months after last childbirth prior to the maternal follow‐up.

Weight change II: weight change from 12 months after last childbirth prior to the maternal follow‐up till the time of the maternal follow‐up.

Weight change (WC) III: weight change from prior to conception of the first child till the time of the maternal follow‐up.

All columns do not sum up to 100% because of missing data.

BMI, body mass index; IQR, interquartile range.

Sample characteristics for all mothers and mothers with depressive symptoms in midlife from the Danish National Birth Cohort (n = 16,998) Weight change I: weight change from prior to conception of the first child till 12 months after last childbirth prior to the maternal follow‐up. Weight change II: weight change from 12 months after last childbirth prior to the maternal follow‐up till the time of the maternal follow‐up. Weight change (WC) III: weight change from prior to conception of the first child till the time of the maternal follow‐up. All columns do not sum up to 100% because of missing data. BMI, body mass index; IQR, interquartile range.

Pre‐pregnancy body mass index

In the crude analysis of pre‐pregnancy BMI, mothers with underweight, overweight and obesity all had more depressive symptoms at follow‐up than normal‐weight mothers. The adjusted analysis changed the estimates very little showing ORs for depressive symptoms of 1.29 (95% CI 0.99–1.68) for underweight mothers, 1.24 (95% CI 1.08–1.42) for mothers with overweight and 1.73 (95% CI 1.43–2.10) for women with obesity. The estimated association was j‐shaped as also shown in Figure 3 with the lowest prevalence of depressive symptoms seen in women with a BMI of approximately 21.0. When restricting the analysis to women with a pre‐pregnancy BMI > 21, the OR for depressive symptoms was 1.04 (95% CI 1.03–1.05) for every one unit increase in BMI when compared with a BMI 21 (Table S1).
Figure 3

Logistic regression for self‐reported depressive symptoms (Center of Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Short, score ≥ 10) according to different weight parameters and BMI‐adjusted waist circumference in first‐time mothers in the Danish National Birth Cohort. Restricted cubic splines adjusted for smoking, social status, age, breastfeeding, marital status and place of residency during pregnancy. Weight change estimates also adjusted for pre‐pregnancy BMI as well as weight change III is adjusted for parity. Weight change I: weight change from pre‐conception till 12 months after last childbirth. Weight change II: weight change from 12 months after last childbirth till the time of the Maternal Follow‐up. Weight change III: weight change from pre‐conception till the time of the Maternal Follow‐up. The dotted lines show 95% confidence intervals. BMI, body mass index.

Logistic regression for self‐reported depressive symptoms (Center of Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Short, score ≥ 10) according to different weight parameters and BMI‐adjusted waist circumference in first‐time mothers in the Danish National Birth Cohort. Restricted cubic splines adjusted for smoking, social status, age, breastfeeding, marital status and place of residency during pregnancy. Weight change estimates also adjusted for pre‐pregnancy BMI as well as weight change III is adjusted for parity. Weight change I: weight change from pre‐conception till 12 months after last childbirth. Weight change II: weight change from 12 months after last childbirth till the time of the Maternal Follow‐up. Weight change III: weight change from pre‐conception till the time of the Maternal Follow‐up. The dotted lines show 95% confidence intervals. BMI, body mass index.

Childbearing‐related weight changes

The odds of depressive symptoms in midlife increased with increasing weight gain in the years of childbearing. Thus, the adjusted ORs were 1.12 (95% CI 0.96–1.30) for women gaining 1–1.99 kg m−2, 1.28 (95% CI 1.07–1.52) for women gaining 2–2.99 kg m−2 and 1.45 (95% CI 1.24–1.70) for women gaining 3 or more kg m−2, indicating a linear trend among those gaining weight (p < 0.001). Weight loss in this period was not associated with greater odds of depressive symptoms at follow‐up than for women with no weight change.

Weight changes after childbearing

All weight changes – both weight loss and gain – after the years of childbearing were associated with increased odds of depressive symptoms by the time of the Maternal Follow‐up compared with maintaining a stable weight. After adjustment for potential confounders, weight loss was associated with a greater OR of 1.38 (95% CI 1.20–1.60) than no weight change. Across all categories of weight gain, ORs for depressive symptoms increased with increasing weight gain; the highest OR (1.88, 95% CI 1.58–2.22) was found in women who had a weight gain of 3 kg m−2 or more compared with women with no weight gain. There was a linear trend among those gaining weight (p < 0.001).

Total weight change

For the combined time period, weight changes of 2 or more kg m−2 were associated with increasing odds of depressive symptoms compared with no weight change with odds ratios of 1.11 (95% CI 0.92–1.33) and 1.68 (95% CI 1.46–1.94) for weight gains of 2–2.99 and 3+ kg m−2, respectively. For all of the aforementioned analyses on weight changes, findings were corroborated on continuous data in Figure 3 and Table S1.

The upper and lower 10th percentile weight changes

Across the entire time period, greater odds of depressive symptoms were observed in women with the highest weight gain (≥90th percentile) with an OR of 1.86 (95% CI 1.60–2.18) compared with women with smaller differences in weight change (the 11th–89th percentile). For those with the largest weight loss (≤10th percentile), the adjusted OR was 1.11 (95% CI 0.92–1.33).

Waist circumference

Women who had a WCBMI > 2.2 cm 7 years postpartum had a crude OR for depressive symptoms at follow‐up of 1.21, which was unchanged after adjustment (OR of 1.16, 95% CI 0.99–1.36), compared with women with a WCBMI between −2.5 and 2.2 cm (Table 2). Women with a WCBMI < −2.5 cm showed a marginally increased OR of 1.09 (95% CI 0.93–1.28). A restricted cubic spline showed a linear association from WCBMI of 0.0 cm and upwards (Figure 3), which is presented in Table S1, indicating a greater OR of 1.04 (95% CI 1.02–1.07) for each 1‐cm increase in WCBMI.
Table 2

Odds ratios (OR) for self‐reported depressive symptoms (CES‐D ≥ 10) according to pre‐pregnancy BMI and different weight parameters in the Danish National Birth Cohort (N = 16,998)

N Depressive symptoms%PD (%)OR CrudeOR Adjust* (95% CI)OR Adjust** (95% CI)
Pre‐pregnancy BMI
Underweight62710316.43.71.351.29(0.99–1.68)NA
Normal‐weight12,3761,57612.70.0 (Ref.)1.0 (Ref.)1.0 (Ref.)NA
Overweight2,95947316.03.31.301.24(1.08–1.42)NA
Obese1,03621120.47.71.751.73(1.43–2.10)NA
Childbearing‐related weight change (BMI units)
Loss of >12,72439314.41.91.191.13(0.97–1.33)1.03(0.87–1.21)
−1–0.996,71483612.50.0 (Ref.)1.0 (Ref.)1.0 (Ref.)1.0 (Ref.)
1–1.993,29942412.90.41.041.11(0.96–1.29)1.12(0.96–1.30)
2–2.991,78426114.62.11.201.29(1.08–1.54)1.28(1.07–1.52)
3+2,47744918.16.31.561.53(1.31–1.79)1.45(1.24–1.70)
Weight change after childbearing (BMI units)
Loss of > 13,61953814.93.81.401.46(1.27–1.68)1.38(1.20–1.60)
−1–0.997,54483611.10.0 (Ref.)1.0 (Ref.)1.0 (Ref.)1.0 (Ref.)
1–1.992,50735614.23.11.331.27(1.08–1.50)1.26(1.07–1.48)
2–2.991,46222315.34.21.441.39(1.15–1.69)1.35(1.11–1.64)
3+1,86641022.010.92.262.00(1.70–2.37)1.88(1.58–2.22)
Total weight change (BMI units)
Loss of >12,35533714.32.61.261.28(1.08–1.51)1.14(0.96–1.36)
−1–0.995,97470011.70.0 (Ref.)1.0 (Ref.)1.0 (Ref.)1.0 (Ref.)
1–1.993,23336711.4−0.30.960.98(0.84–1.15)0.99(0.84–1.16)
2–2.991,97228114.22.51.251.11(0.92–1.34)1.11(0.92–1.33)
3+3,46467819.67.91.831.75(1.52–2.02)1.68(1.46–1.94)
Extreme changes, whole period
10% with greatest weight loss1,69925414.92.31.221.26(1.06–1.49)1.11(0.92–1.33)
No extreme changes13,5991,71312.60.0 (Ref.)1.0 (Ref.)1.0 (Ref.)1.0 (Ref.)
10% with greatest weight gain1,70039623.310.72.111.97(1.69–2.29)1.86(1.60–2.18)
BMI‐adjusted waist circumference, 7 years (cm)
<−2.5 cm3,76250613.51.81.181.09(0.93–1.28)NA
−2.5–2.23,76443911.70.0 (Ref.)1.0 (Ref.)1.0 (Ref.)NA
>2.23,76451913.82.11.211.16(0.99–1.36)NA

Adjusted for social status, smoking, age, breastfeeding, marital status and living area. Weight change after childbearing (WCII) also adjusted for parity.

Additionally adjusted for pre‐pregnancy BMI.

BMI, body mass index; N, numbers; PD, prevalence difference; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence intervals.

Odds ratios (OR) for self‐reported depressive symptoms (CES‐D ≥ 10) according to pre‐pregnancy BMI and different weight parameters in the Danish National Birth Cohort (N = 16,998) Adjusted for social status, smoking, age, breastfeeding, marital status and living area. Weight change after childbearing (WCII) also adjusted for parity. Additionally adjusted for pre‐pregnancy BMI. BMI, body mass index; N, numbers; PD, prevalence difference; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence intervals. When applying a cut‐off of ≥12 as definition of depressive symptoms, results supported the main findings although associations for some analyses were stronger (Table S3). Adding adjustment for depressive symptoms measured close to baseline in relation to the index pregnancy did only alter results a little (differences in OR between −0.09 and +0.04) (Table S2).

Discussion

We found that low and high pre‐pregnancy BMI, weight loss after years of childbearing and weight gain, both in the childbearing years and particular in the years after the last childbirth, were associated with depressive symptoms among mothers in midlife 11–16 years after childbirth. Further, women with a larger WC than predicted by their BMI, indicating a relative excess of abdominal fat mass, reported more depressive symptoms than women with a WC in accordance with their BMI. Many women experience depressive symptoms in midlife 20, and mother's well‐being is of importance not only to themselves but also their families and society. Our results indicate an association between weight, weight changes and depressive symptoms, which suggest that health professionals should pay attention to mothers who retain larger weight changes in their reproductive years and beyond as these weight changes may be associated with depressive symptoms. Likewise, they should also pay attention to women with depressive symptoms as they may be more susceptible to weight change. Our results are in accordance with results from the general population on obesity and depression 5, 6, 39. In analyses focusing on women only, obesity was also associated with a greater risk of later depressive symptoms with a relative increased risk of 10–33% compared with normal‐weight women 7, 8, 40. We found an OR of 1.73 for women with obesity, indicating an even higher excess risk of depressive symptoms in our cohort of mothers. In a former study based on the DNBC, we found no increased risk for anxiety and/or depression in mothers with obesity over a 6‐year period 13. The outcome was defined by redeemed prescriptions and/or ICD10 codes, which might explain the differences. In the present study, we capture signs of depression, which may not be so severe that it leads to a prescription or diagnosis, but indicate poor mental well‐being in women with high pre‐pregnancy BMI. In both studies, being underweight was associated with a greater risk of poor mental health. It may also be that the behaviour of the health professionals can explain these differences if they are more alert to underweight women with depressive symptoms. Further, underweight may be a sign of underlying conditions such as anorexia or chronic diseases that may also affect mental health 41, 42, 43. The higher prevalence of depressive symptoms in mothers with weight gain compared with mothers with a stable weight is in line with previous follow‐up studies, which found that mental well‐being was highest in women with a stable weight during a 2‐year period in midlife 44, while women who lost weight or gained more than 10% of their BMI over a 3‐year period had an elevated risk of clinically significant depressive symptoms 8. In a cohort study surveying women on weight and depression scores every third year in a 12‐year period, weight change and depression were also associated, but after using weight change in the two preceding surveys as a predictor for depression, the association disappeared 12. Other studies have found that depressive conditions may lead to weight changes – both loss and gain, 12, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 supporting the idea that effects of weight change and depressive symptoms may be bi‐directional and associations intertwined. Irrespective of the temporal relations between body weight measures and depressive symptoms in the present study, the causal direction cannot be determined. Because of the long time span in our cohort, depressive symptoms in each mother may have come and gone more than once during follow‐up and affected weight changes. Clearly, we report a point prevalence of depressive symptoms in midlife. We had sparse information about depressive symptoms during follow‐up to examine bi‐directionality, but when adjusting for depressive symptoms at gestational week 30 and 6 months postpartum in the beginning of the study period, it had little effect on our findings. The combination of results and consistency in associations suggest that weight gain or loss may affect symptoms of depression although reverse causation cannot be ruled out. Future research should study causality including direction and possible mechanisms of these associations. We found increased WCBMI to be associated with greater odds of depressive symptoms. This has not previously been studied in mothers but abdominal obesity has been linked with depression in men 4, 23. The main strength of this study pertains to the features of the DNBC, including the Maternal Follow‐up, allowing for a large sample size with detailed information on potential confounders. With several weight measurements during follow‐up, we were able to detect time periods of weight change and separate weight changes related to the childbearing period and beyond. Another important strength is the identification of self‐reported depressive symptoms using a validated score and our ability to account for depressive disorders and depressive symptoms close to baseline. This study also has some limitations. All exposure information on weight parameters and waist circumference in this study was self‐reported. Thus, there is some misclassification. We know from a validation study within the DNBC 50 that pre‐pregnancy BMI tended to be under‐reported with approximately 0.6 kg, and this underreporting increased slightly with increasing BMI. However, agreement within BMI categories was approximately 90%. The weights for calculation of the respective weight changes may suffer from similar under‐reporting, which may attenuate the error on weight changes measures. The mothers had to recall weight 12 months after last childbirth, which may be prone to errors. Reassuringly, when comparing reported weight at 18 months (from an interview at 18 months postpartum) and recalled weight 12 months after last childbirth in women with one child only, we found a high correlation in calculated BMI (Pearson's correlation = 0.89). We do not anticipate any systematic differential misclassification by level of depressive symptoms. Of the initial eligible study population, only 51% participated in the Maternal Follow‐up. Of these, some did not provide information on weight parameters during follow‐up. Women with information on weight parameters were older at baseline, had a higher socio‐occupational status and had a lower pre‐pregnancy BMI than those not providing these data (data not shown). Also, weight gain during follow‐up, family size and depressive symptoms status may be associated with non‐participation and hence potentially lead to selection bias. However, by adjusting for factors such as age, socio‐occupational‐status, smoking, marital status and parity, which may be associated with both participation and depressive symptoms, we aimed to reduce the influence from selection bias 51. Despite adjustment for potential confounders, we cannot rule out risk of residual confounders due to unknown or unmeasured confounding. We had no data to adjust for chronic diseases and medication. Notably, the DNBC consists of Caucasian women only, and generalizability of our findings to other groups is unknown. In conclusion, high and low pre‐pregnancy BMI, weight gain during the years of childbearing and the following years, and abdominal obesity increased the prevalence of depressive symptoms in maternal midlife. These findings suggest having a healthy weight prior to reproduction and retaining this weight, except when pregnant, support mental well‐being in mothers in midlife. Prevention of obesity and weight changes, other than gestational weight gain, may lead to less depressive symptoms in mothers in midlife.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Funding

The Danish National Research Foundation established the Danish Epidemiology Science Centre, which initiated and created the Danish National Birth Cohort. The cohort is a result of a major grant from this Foundation. Additional support for the Danish National Birth Cohort was obtained from the Pharmacy Foundation, the Egmont Foundation, the March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation and the Augustinus Foundation. Support for the Maternal Follow‐up was granted by The Danish Council for Independent Research (0602‐01042B). Figure S1. Supplementary Table S1. Odd ratios (OR) for self‐reported depressive symptoms according to weight changes in sub‐groups of women with weight loss or gain or less or more abdominal fat mass than predicted. For women with BMI > 21 units: OR for self‐reported depressive symptoms according to pre‐pregnancy body mass index (BMI) on continuous data. First‐time mothers in the Danish National Birth Cohort Supplementary Table S2. Odds ratios (OR) for self‐reported depressive symptoms (CES‐D ≥ 10) according to pre‐pregnancy BMI and different weight parameters in the Danish National Birth Cohort (N = 12,732). WITH ADJUSTMENT FOR DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS IN PREGNANCY AND 6 MONTHS AFTER CHILDBIRTH Supplementary Table S3. Odds ratios (OR) for self‐reported depressive symptoms (CESD‐S ≥ 12) according to pre‐pregnancy BMI and different weight parameters in the Danish National Birth Cohort (N = 16,998) Supporting info item Click here for additional data file. Supporting info item Click here for additional data file. Supporting info item Click here for additional data file. Supporting info item Click here for additional data file.
  45 in total

1.  Childbearing may increase visceral adipose tissue independent of overall increase in body fat.

Authors:  Erica P Gunderson; Barbara Sternfeld; Melissa F Wellons; Rachel A Whitmer; Vicky Chiang; Charles P Quesenberry; Cora E Lewis; Stephen Sidney
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 5.002

2.  Mental disorders in motherhood according to prepregnancy BMI and pregnancy-related weight changes--A Danish cohort study.

Authors:  Mette Bliddal; Anton Pottegård; Helene Kirkegaard; Jørn Olsen; Jan Stener Jørgensen; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Chunsen Wu; Ellen A Nohr
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 4.839

3.  Obesity and depression: results from the longitudinal Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort Study.

Authors:  A Herva; J Laitinen; J Miettunen; J Veijola; J T Karvonen; K Läksy; M Joukamaa
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.095

4.  Depression and Its Comorbid Conditions More Serious in Women than in Men in the United States.

Authors:  Woo Kyoung Kim; Dayeon Shin; Won O Song
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in older Chinese: thresholds for long and short forms.

Authors:  Sheung-Tak Cheng; Alfred C M Chan
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.485

6.  Criterion validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D): results from a community-based sample of older subjects in The Netherlands.

Authors:  A T Beekman; D J Deeg; J Van Limbeek; A W Braam; M Z De Vries; W Van Tilburg
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.723

7.  A prospective study of overweight, physical activity, and depressive symptoms in young women.

Authors:  Kylie Ball; Nicola W Burton; Wendy J Brown
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 5.002

8.  Association of postpartum depression with weight retention 1 year after childbirth.

Authors:  Sharon J Herring; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Emily Oken; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Ken P Kleinman; Matthew W Gillman
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 5.002

9.  Bidirectional association between depression and obesity in middle-aged and older women.

Authors:  A Pan; Q Sun; S Czernichow; M Kivimaki; O I Okereke; M Lucas; J E Manson; A Ascherio; F B Hu
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 5.095

10.  Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.

Authors:  Marie Ng; Tom Fleming; Margaret Robinson; Blake Thomson; Nicholas Graetz; Christopher Margono; Erin C Mullany; Stan Biryukov; Cristiana Abbafati; Semaw Ferede Abera; Jerry P Abraham; Niveen M E Abu-Rmeileh; Tom Achoki; Fadia S AlBuhairan; Zewdie A Alemu; Rafael Alfonso; Mohammed K Ali; Raghib Ali; Nelson Alvis Guzman; Walid Ammar; Palwasha Anwari; Amitava Banerjee; Simon Barquera; Sanjay Basu; Derrick A Bennett; Zulfiqar Bhutta; Jed Blore; Norberto Cabral; Ismael Campos Nonato; Jung-Chen Chang; Rajiv Chowdhury; Karen J Courville; Michael H Criqui; David K Cundiff; Kaustubh C Dabhadkar; Lalit Dandona; Adrian Davis; Anand Dayama; Samath D Dharmaratne; Eric L Ding; Adnan M Durrani; Alireza Esteghamati; Farshad Farzadfar; Derek F J Fay; Valery L Feigin; Abraham Flaxman; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Atsushi Goto; Mark A Green; Rajeev Gupta; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Graeme J Hankey; Heather C Harewood; Rasmus Havmoeller; Simon Hay; Lucia Hernandez; Abdullatif Husseini; Bulat T Idrisov; Nayu Ikeda; Farhad Islami; Eiman Jahangir; Simerjot K Jassal; Sun Ha Jee; Mona Jeffreys; Jost B Jonas; Edmond K Kabagambe; Shams Eldin Ali Hassan Khalifa; Andre Pascal Kengne; Yousef Saleh Khader; Young-Ho Khang; Daniel Kim; Ruth W Kimokoti; Jonas M Kinge; Yoshihiro Kokubo; Soewarta Kosen; Gene Kwan; Taavi Lai; Mall Leinsalu; Yichong Li; Xiaofeng Liang; Shiwei Liu; Giancarlo Logroscino; Paulo A Lotufo; Yuan Lu; Jixiang Ma; Nana Kwaku Mainoo; George A Mensah; Tony R Merriman; Ali H Mokdad; Joanna Moschandreas; Mohsen Naghavi; Aliya Naheed; Devina Nand; K M Venkat Narayan; Erica Leigh Nelson; Marian L Neuhouser; Muhammad Imran Nisar; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Samuel O Oti; Andrea Pedroza; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Nobhojit Roy; Uchechukwu Sampson; Hyeyoung Seo; Sadaf G Sepanlou; Kenji Shibuya; Rahman Shiri; Ivy Shiue; Gitanjali M Singh; Jasvinder A Singh; Vegard Skirbekk; Nicolas J C Stapelberg; Lela Sturua; Bryan L Sykes; Martin Tobias; Bach X Tran; Leonardo Trasande; Hideaki Toyoshima; Steven van de Vijver; Tommi J Vasankari; J Lennert Veerman; Gustavo Velasquez-Melendez; Vasiliy Victorovich Vlassov; Stein Emil Vollset; Theo Vos; Claire Wang; XiaoRong Wang; Elisabete Weiderpass; Andrea Werdecker; Jonathan L Wright; Y Claire Yang; Hiroshi Yatsuya; Jihyun Yoon; Seok-Jun Yoon; Yong Zhao; Maigeng Zhou; Shankuan Zhu; Alan D Lopez; Christopher J L Murray; Emmanuela Gakidou
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prevalence of Depression and Associated Factors Among Normal and Overweight Reproductive Age Women, Ethiopia: Community-Based Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Abayneh Shewangzaw Engda; Habte Belete; Fikir Addisu Tilahun; Solomon Moges Demeke; Nigus Alemnew Engidaw; Abate Dargie Wubetu; Eyosiyas Yeshialem Asefa
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2021-03-22

2.  Depressive symptoms in women's midlife in relation to their body weight before, during and after childbearing years.

Authors:  M Bliddal; A Pottegård; H Kirkegaard; J Olsen; T I A Sørensen; E A Nohr
Journal:  Obes Sci Pract       Date:  2016-11-09

3.  A potential role for insulin treatment during pregnancy in reducing postpartum psychological distress in maternal obesity: an administrative population health study.

Authors:  Jessica S Jarmasz; Alexandrea Anderson; Margaret E Bock; Yan Jin; Peter A Cattini; Chelsea Ruth
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.809

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.