Literature DB >> 28090303

Genotype-phenotype effects of Bmpr2 mutations on disease severity in mouse models of pulmonary hypertension.

Andrea L Frump1, Arunima Datta2, Sampa Ghose2, James West3, Mark P de Caestecker4.   

Abstract

More than 350 mutations in the type-2 BMP (bone morphogenetic protein) receptor, BMPR2, have been identified in patients with heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension (HPAH). However, only 30% of BMPR2 mutation carriers develop PAH, and we cannot predict which of these carriers will develop clinical disease. One possibility is that the nature of the BMPR2 mutation affects disease severity. This hypothesis has been difficult to test clinically, given the rarity of HPAH and the complexity of the confounding genetic and environmental risk factors. To test this hypothesis, therefore, we evaluated the susceptibility to experimental pulmonary hypertension (PH) of mice carrying different HPAH-associated Bmpr2 mutations on otherwise identical genetic backgrounds. Mice with Bmpr2ΔEx4-5 mutations (Bmpr2+/-), in which the mutant protein is not expressed, develop less severe PH in response to hypoxia or hypoxia with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibition than mice with an extracellular-domain Bmpr2ΔEx2 mutation (Bmpr2ΔEx2/+), in which the mutant protein is expressed. This was associated with a marked decrease in stabilizing phosphorylation of threonine 495 endothelial nitric oxide synthase (pThr495 eNOS) in Bmpr2ΔEx2/+ compared to wild-type and Bmpr2+/- mouse lungs. These findings provide the first experimental evidence that BMPR2 mutation types influence the severity of HPAH and suggest that patients with BMPR2 mutations who express mutant BMPR2 proteins by escaping non-sense-mediated messenger RNA decay (NMD- mutations) will develop more severe disease than HPAH patients with NMD+ mutations who do not express BMPR2 mutant proteins. Since decreased levels of pThr495 eNOS are associated with increased eNOS uncoupling, our data also suggest that this effect may result from defects in eNOS function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone morphogenetic protein type 2 receptor mutations; disease severity; endothelial nitric oxide synthase; experimental pulmonary hypertension; hereditary pulmonary arterial hypertension; non-sense-mediated messenger RNA decay

Year:  2016        PMID: 28090303      PMCID: PMC5210048          DOI: 10.1086/688930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pulm Circ        ISSN: 2045-8932            Impact factor:   3.017


  58 in total

Review 1.  A brief overview of mouse models of pulmonary arterial hypertension: problems and prospects.

Authors:  Jose Gomez-Arroyo; Sheinei J Saleem; Shiro Mizuno; Aamer A Syed; Harm J Bogaard; Antonio Abbate; Laimute Taraseviciene-Stewart; Yon Sung; Donatas Kraskauskas; Daniela Farkas; Daniel H Conrad; Mark R Nicolls; Norbert F Voelkel
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 5.464

Review 2.  Regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase: location, location, location.

Authors:  Philip W Shaul
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 19.318

3.  Nitric oxide synthase in pulmonary hypertension: lessons from knockout mice.

Authors:  K A Fagan; I McMurtry; D M Rodman
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.881

4.  Nitric oxide and pulmonary arterial pressures in pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Roberto F Machado; Medha-Vini Londhe Nerkar; Raed A Dweik; Jeffrey Hammel; Allison Janocha; Jacqueline Pyle; Daniel Laskowski; Constance Jennings; Alejandro C Arroliga; Serpil C Erzurum
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 7.376

5.  Clinical outcomes of pulmonary arterial hypertension in carriers of BMPR2 mutation.

Authors:  Benjamin Sztrymf; Florence Coulet; Barbara Girerd; Azzedine Yaici; Xavier Jais; Olivier Sitbon; David Montani; Rogério Souza; Gerald Simonneau; Florent Soubrier; Marc Humbert
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Increased susceptibility to hypoxic pulmonary hypertension in Bmpr2 mutant mice is associated with endothelial dysfunction in the pulmonary vasculature.

Authors:  David B Frank; Jonathan Lowery; Lynda Anderson; Monique Brink; Jeff Reese; Mark de Caestecker
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 5.464

7.  Hemodynamic and clinical onset in patients with hereditary pulmonary arterial hypertension and BMPR2 mutations.

Authors:  Nicole Pfarr; Justyna Szamalek-Hoegel; Christine Fischer; Katrin Hinderhofer; Christian Nagel; Nicola Ehlken; Henning Tiede; Horst Olschewski; Frank Reichenberger; Ardeschir H A Ghofrani; Werner Seeger; Ekkehard Grünig
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2011-07-29

8.  Development of pulmonary arterial hypertension in mice over-expressing S100A4/Mts1 is specific to females.

Authors:  Yvonne Dempsie; Margaret Nilsen; Kevin White; Kirsty M Mair; Lynn Loughlin; Noona Ambartsumian; Marlene Rabinovitch; Margaret R Maclean
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2011-12-20

9.  Activity of the estrogen-metabolizing enzyme cytochrome P450 1B1 influences the development of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Kevin White; Anne Katrine Johansen; Margaret Nilsen; Loredana Ciuclan; Emma Wallace; Leigh Paton; Annabel Campbell; Ian Morecroft; Lynn Loughlin; John D McClure; Matthew Thomas; Kirsty M Mair; Margaret R MacLean
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Progressive right ventricular functional and structural changes in a mouse model of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Zhijie Wang; David A Schreier; Timothy A Hacker; Naomi C Chesler
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2013-12-15
View more
  10 in total

1.  CrossTalk opposing view: The mouse SuHx model is not a good model of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Sally H Vitali
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  CrossTalk proposal: The mouse SuHx model is a good model of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Krishna C Penumatsa; Rod R Warburton; Nicholas S Hill; Barry L Fanburg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Genetics and Other Omics in Pediatric Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Carrie L Welch; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 4.  Genes that drive the pathobiology of pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Carrie L Welch; Eric D Austin; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2020-01-09

5.  BMPR2 mutations and endothelial dysfunction in pulmonary arterial hypertension (2017 Grover Conference Series).

Authors:  Andrea Frump; Allison Prewitt; Mark P de Caestecker
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.017

6.  Endothelial senescence mediates hypoxia-induced vascular remodeling by modulating PDGFB expression.

Authors:  Priscilla Kyi; Kathryn Hendee; Tendai Hunyenyiwa; Kienna Matus; Tadanori Mammoto; Akiko Mammoto
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-20

7.  Endothelial Twist1-PDGFB signaling mediates hypoxia-induced proliferation and migration of αSMA-positive cells.

Authors:  Akiko Mammoto; Tadanori Mammoto; Kathryn Hendee; Megan Muyleart
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Molecular and Genetic Profiling for Precision Medicines in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Shahood Fazal; Malik Bisserier; Lahouaria Hadri
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 7.666

9.  Identification of a novel mutation in the BMPR2 gene in a pulmonary arterial hypertension patient using next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Xiao Xu; Xin Wang; Guo-Can Yang; Qi Liu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 10.  The changing face of pulmonary hypertension diagnosis: a historical perspective on the influence of diagnostics and biomarkers.

Authors:  Jenny L Hewes; Ji Young Lee; Karen A Fagan; Natalie N Bauer
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.017

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.