Literature DB >> 28090170

Gender's role in misperceptions of peers' sexual motives.

Rose Wesche1, Graciela Espinosa-Hernández2, Eva S Lefkowitz3.   

Abstract

The sexual double standard influences men's and women's sexual attitudes and behavior, leading men and women to consider distinct sexual motives, or reasons whether or not to engage in sexual intercourse (Crawford & Popp 2003; Reiss 1964). The goal of the present paper was to document how the sexual double standard shapes perceptions of peers' sexual motives. We build on past research by using open-ended questions and measuring perceptions of both same-gender and other-gender peers. The sample included 154 heterosexual college students (50% female, 49% European American, 25% Latino American, 26% African American) recruited via probability sampling. When we compared perceptions of men's and women's sexual motives, we found that participants seemed to rely on the sexual double standard. Participants were more likely to attribute a female-stereotyped motive (e.g., romantic relationship characteristics, feeling "ready", emotional investment) and less likely to attribute a male-stereotyped motive ("easy", arousal, physical appearance) to female peers than to male peers. However, when we compared participants' own motives to perceptions of their peers' motives, participants overestimated male-stereotyped motives and underestimated female-stereotyped motives in peers, regardless of peer gender, possibly in congruence with stereotypes of hookup culture. These findings demonstrate that, although individuals sometimes rely on the sexual double standard to attribute sexual motives to others, misperceptions of peers' sexual motives may also be influenced by stereotypes of hookup culture. These misperceptions contribute to pluralistic ignorance that may influence college students' sexual behaviors.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 28090170      PMCID: PMC5224800          DOI: 10.1007/s12119-016-9370-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Cult        ISSN: 1095-5143


  23 in total

1.  Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties.

Authors:  J J Arnett
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2000-05

2.  Alcohol's effects on sexual perception.

Authors:  A Abbey; T Zawacki; P McAuslan
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2000-09

3.  Adolescents' reasons for having sex: gender differences.

Authors:  Emily J Ozer; M Margaret Dolcini; Gary W Harper
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.012

4.  Misperceiving the college drinking norm and related problems: a nationwide study of exposure to prevention information, perceived norms and student alcohol misuse.

Authors:  H Wesley Perkins; Michael P Haines; Richard Rice
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2005-07

5.  The measurement of psychological androgyny.

Authors:  S L Bem
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1974-04

6.  Differences between males and females in motives for engaging in sexual intercourse.

Authors:  J L Carroll; K D Volk; J S Hyde
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1985-04

7.  Descriptive and injunctive social norm overestimation in hooking up and their role as predictors of hook-up activity in a college student sample.

Authors:  Megan Barriger; Carlos J Vélez-Blasini
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2011-09-15

8.  Differences between actual and perceived student norms: an examination of alcohol use, drug use, and sexual behavior.

Authors:  Matthew P Martens; Jennifer C Page; Emily S Mowry; Krista M Damann; Kari K Taylor; M Dolores Cimini
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr

9.  Why humans have sex.

Authors:  Cindy M Meston; David M Buss
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2007-07-03

Review 10.  Sexual double standards: a review and methodological critique of two decades of research.

Authors:  Mary Crawford; Danielle Popp
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2003-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.