Literature DB >> 21919644

Descriptive and injunctive social norm overestimation in hooking up and their role as predictors of hook-up activity in a college student sample.

Megan Barriger1, Carlos J Vélez-Blasini.   

Abstract

This study examined the presence of norm overestimation in both injunctive and descriptive norms about hooking up. An online survey was completed by 186 college students (127 women). Overestimation was examined for hooking up as a global category, as well as for six specific behaviors. The role of norms in predicting hooking up was also examined using hierarchical multiple regression analyses. The predictive role of sensation-seeking, sociosexual orientation, self-esteem, and alcohol drinking status was also examined. Injunctive norm overestimation was present for less intimate behaviors (kissing and non-genital touching); only women showed overestimation for more intimate behaviors (genital touching, receiving oral sex, giving oral sex, and intercourse). Descriptive norms were overestimated across the board. Injunctive norms were poor predictors of behavior. Descriptive norms were good predictors only for less intimate behaviors, a pattern similar to that observed for drinking status. Ultimately, participants' level of personal comfort was the best predictor of participation in the most intimate behaviors, including oral sex and sexual intercourse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21919644     DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2011.607928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Res        ISSN: 0022-4499


  11 in total

1.  Mechanisms That Link Parenting Practices to Adolescents' Risky Sexual Behavior: A Test of Six Competing Theories.

Authors:  Leslie Gordon Simons; Tara E Sutton; Ronald L Simons; Frederick X Gibbons; Velma McBride Murry
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2015-12-30

2.  Predictors of sexual hookups: a theory-based, prospective study of first-year college women.

Authors:  Robyn L Fielder; Jennifer L Walsh; Kate B Carey; Michael P Carey
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2013-05-09

3.  The Relationship Between Perceived Hookup Attitudes and Negative Hookup Consequences: Do Perceived Attitudes of Close Friends Matter?

Authors:  Kevin S Montes; Lyzette Blanco; Joseph W LaBrie
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2016-12-27

4.  What is hooking up? Examining definitions of hooking up in relation to behavior and normative perceptions.

Authors:  Melissa A Lewis; David C Atkins; Jessica A Blayney; David V Dent; Debra L Kaysen
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2012-10-11

5.  The longitudinal relationships among injunctive norms and hooking up attitudes and behaviors in college students.

Authors:  Lucy E Napper; Shannon R Kenney; Joseph W LaBrie
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2014-09-25

6.  Negative affect as a moderator of the relationship between hookup motives and hookup consequences.

Authors:  Kevin S Montes; Lucy E Napper; Nicole M Froidevaux; Shannon Kenney; Joseph W LaBrie
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2016-07-25

7.  Gender's role in misperceptions of peers' sexual motives.

Authors:  Rose Wesche; Graciela Espinosa-Hernández; Eva S Lefkowitz
Journal:  Sex Cult       Date:  2016-07-05

8.  Social Norms: Are Sexually Aggressive Men More Likely to Misperceive Other Men's Sexual Desires and Behavior?

Authors:  Erin A Casey; N Tatiana Masters; Blair Beadnell
Journal:  J Aggress Maltreat Trauma       Date:  2020-02-12

9.  Preventing College Sexual Victimization by Reducing Hookups: a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Normative Feedback Intervention.

Authors:  Maria Testa; Jennifer A Livingston; Weijun Wang; Melissa A Lewis
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2020-04

10.  Sexual sensation seeking, hookups, and alcohol consumption among first-year college students.

Authors:  Shemeka Thorpe; Samuella Ware; Amanda E Tanner; Kari C Kugler; Kate Guastaferro; Jeffrey J Milroy; David L Wyrick
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2020-01-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.