Faisal M Shaikh1, Peter M Stewart2, Stewart R Walsh3, R Justin Davies2. 1. Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland. Electronic address: faisalshaikh@rcsi.ie. 2. Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK. 3. Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage (LPL) has been proposed as an alternative, less invasive technique in the treatment of acute perforated sigmoid diverticulitis (APSD). The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the effectiveness of LPL versus surgical resection (SR) in terms of morbidity and mortality in the management of APSD. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LPL versus SR in the treatment of APSD. The end points included peri-operative mortality, severe adverse events, overall mortality, post-operative abscess, percutaneous reinterventions, reoperation, operative time, postoperative stay, and readmissions. RESULTS: Three RCTs with a total of 372 patients, randomised to either LPL or SR were included. There was no significant difference in peri-operative mortality between LPL and SR (OR 1.356, 95% CI 0.365 to 5.032, p = 0.649), or serious adverse events (OR = 1.866, 95% CI = 0.680 to 5.120, p = 0.226). The LPL required significantly less time to complete than SR (WMD = -72.105, 95% CI = -88.335 to -55.876, p < 0.0001). The LPL group was associated with a significantly higher rate of postoperative abscess formation (OR = 4.121, 95% CI = 1.890 to 8.986, p = 0.0004) and subsequent percutaneous interventions (OR = 5.414, 95% CI 1.618 to 18.118, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage is a safe and quick alternative in the management of APSD. In comparison to SR, LPL results in higher rates of postoperative abscess formation requiring more percutaneous drainage interventions without any difference in perioperative mortality and serious morbidity. Crown
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage (LPL) has been proposed as an alternative, less invasive technique in the treatment of acute perforated sigmoid diverticulitis (APSD). The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the effectiveness of LPL versus surgical resection (SR) in terms of morbidity and mortality in the management of APSD. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LPL versus SR in the treatment of APSD. The end points included peri-operative mortality, severe adverse events, overall mortality, post-operative abscess, percutaneous reinterventions, reoperation, operative time, postoperative stay, and readmissions. RESULTS: Three RCTs with a total of 372 patients, randomised to either LPL or SR were included. There was no significant difference in peri-operative mortality between LPL and SR (OR 1.356, 95% CI 0.365 to 5.032, p = 0.649), or serious adverse events (OR = 1.866, 95% CI = 0.680 to 5.120, p = 0.226). The LPL required significantly less time to complete than SR (WMD = -72.105, 95% CI = -88.335 to -55.876, p < 0.0001). The LPL group was associated with a significantly higher rate of postoperative abscess formation (OR = 4.121, 95% CI = 1.890 to 8.986, p = 0.0004) and subsequent percutaneous interventions (OR = 5.414, 95% CI 1.618 to 18.118, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage is a safe and quick alternative in the management of APSD. In comparison to SR, LPL results in higher rates of postoperative abscess formation requiring more percutaneous drainage interventions without any difference in perioperative mortality and serious morbidity. Crown
Authors: Nicolás H Dreifuss; Francisco Schlottmann; Jose M Piatti; Maximiliano E Bun; Nicolás A Rotholtz Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Daniël P V Lambrichts; Arianna Birindelli; Valeria Tonini; Roberto Cirocchi; Maurizio Cervellera; Johan F Lange; Willem A Bemelman; Salomone Di Saverio Journal: Inflamm Intest Dis Date: 2018-02-16
Authors: A Kohl; J Rosenberg; D Bock; T Bisgaard; S Skullman; A Thornell; J Gehrman; E Angenete; E Haglind Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Massimo Sartelli; Dieter G Weber; Yoram Kluger; Luca Ansaloni; Federico Coccolini; Fikri Abu-Zidan; Goran Augustin; Offir Ben-Ishay; Walter L Biffl; Konstantinos Bouliaris; Rodolfo Catena; Marco Ceresoli; Osvaldo Chiara; Massimo Chiarugi; Raul Coimbra; Francesco Cortese; Yunfeng Cui; Dimitris Damaskos; Gian Luigi De' Angelis; Samir Delibegovic; Zaza Demetrashvili; Belinda De Simone; Francesco Di Marzo; Salomone Di Saverio; Therese M Duane; Mario Paulo Faro; Gustavo P Fraga; George Gkiokas; Carlos Augusto Gomes; Timothy C Hardcastle; Andreas Hecker; Aleksandar Karamarkovic; Jeffry Kashuk; Vladimir Khokha; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Kenneth Y Y Kok; Kenji Inaba; Arda Isik; Francesco M Labricciosa; Rifat Latifi; Ari Leppäniemi; Andrey Litvin; John E Mazuski; Ronald V Maier; Sanjay Marwah; Michael McFarlane; Ernest E Moore; Frederick A Moore; Ionut Negoi; Leonardo Pagani; Kemal Rasa; Ines Rubio-Perez; Boris Sakakushev; Norio Sato; Gabriele Sganga; Walter Siquini; Antonio Tarasconi; Matti Tolonen; Jan Ulrych; Sannop K Zachariah; Fausto Catena Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 5.469