Literature DB >> 2808992

Comparison of the internal defibrillation thresholds for monophasic and double and single capacitor biphasic waveforms.

K M Kavanagh1, A S Tang, D L Rollins, W M Smith, R E Ideker.   

Abstract

Implantable cardiac defibrillators are now an accepted form of therapy for patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias that cannot be controlled by antiarrhythmic drugs. These devices could be made even more acceptable if they were smaller, had increased longevity and the surgical procedure for implantation was less invasive. Reducing the energy requirements for internal defibrillation with use of a nonthoracotomy system would make all of these goals achievable. Monophasic and double and single capacitor biphasic waveforms were compared in 14 anesthetized dogs (25.5 +/- 2.2 kg) with use of a nonthoracotomy lead system that has previously been shown to distribute the delivered voltage throughout the heart more equally. Cathodal catheter electrodes were placed in the right ventricular apex and outflow tract. The anodal electrode was a large cutaneous R2 patch placed over the left side of the chest. The mean energy requirement for defibrillation when a single capacitor biphasic waveform was used was significantly less (6.4 +/- 2.6 J) than that for either the double capacitor biphasic or the monophasic waveform (18.0 +/- 8.0 and 17.4 +/- 8.0 J, respectively) of the same duration. Unexpectedly, the leading edge voltage for the phase I of the single capacitor biphasic waveform was significantly less (266 +/- 51 V) than that for either the double capacitor biphasic or the monophasic waveform (336 +/- 76 and 427 +/- 117 V, respectively). In conclusion, in large dogs, defibrillation is possible at low energy levels with a single capacitor biphasic waveform.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2808992     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90439-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  4 in total

1.  Does reducing capacitance have potential for further miniaturisation of implantable defibrillators?

Authors:  E Alt; F Evans; P D Wolf; J Pasquantonio; L Stotts; S Heinz; A Schömig
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Effect of drugs on defibrillation capacity.

Authors:  Anna Legreid Dopp; John M Miller; James E Tisdale
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  High defibrillation threshold: the science, signs and solutions.

Authors:  Sony Jacob; Victorio Pidlaoan; Jaspreet Singh; Aditya Bharadwaj; Mehul B Patel; Antonio Carrillo
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-01-07

4.  Implantation of additional subcutaneous array electrode reduces defibrillation threshold in ICD patients - preliminary results.

Authors:  Maciej Kempa; Szymon Budrejko; Lukasz Drelich; Tomasz Królak; Grzegorz Raczak; Dariusz Kozłowski
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.318

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.