Literature DB >> 28087382

Efficacy and safety of high-dose rush oral immunotherapy in persistent egg allergic children: A randomized clinical trial.

Inmaculada Pérez-Rangel1, Pablo Rodríguez Del Río2, Carmelo Escudero2, Silvia Sánchez-García2, José Javier Sánchez-Hernández3, María Dolores Ibáñez4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Egg oral immunotherapy is effective but time consuming.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of egg rush oral immunotherapy (ROIT) with a targeted dose equivalent to a raw egg white.
METHODS: Thirty-three persistent egg allergic children confirmed by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) were randomized to receive egg ROIT immediately after randomization (ROIT1 group), or to continue an egg avoidance diet for 5 months after randomization (control group [CG]). A 5-day build-up phase starting with the highest single tolerated dose at baseline DBPCFC was scheduled and several doses administered daily until achieving a dose of approximately 2,808 mg of egg white protein. In the maintenance phase, patients ate an undercooked egg every 48 hours for 5 months. The CG participants who failed the DBPCFC at 5 months began active treatment. Children from the ROIT1 group plus children from the CG who failed a second DBPCFC at 5 months and then received egg ROIT were randomized to the ROIT2 group. Adverse events (AEs) and immune marker evolution were recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 17 (89%) of 19 children in the ROIT1 group and no CG patients were desensitized at 5 months (P < .001). A total of 31 (97%) of the 32 children in the ROIT2 group completed the build-up phase in a median of 3 days (range, 1-14 days), and 30 (94%) of 32 maintained desensitization at 5 months. From baseline to 5 months of treatment, skin prick test, specific IgE, and specific IgE/IgG4 ratio to egg fractions significantly decreased, whereas specific IgG4 increased. During the build-up phase, AEs occurred in 69% of patients (50% had ≤2 AEs) and 31% of doses (2% severe, 55% gastrointestinal). Lower threshold dose in the DBPCFC and higher egg white and ovalbumin specific IgE levels at baseline revealed an association with a higher rate of AEs.
CONCLUSION: The proposed 5-day egg ROIT desensitized 94% of the allergic patients, with most AEs being mild or moderate.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28087382     DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.11.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol        ISSN: 1081-1206            Impact factor:   6.347


  9 in total

Review 1.  Update on oral immunotherapy for egg allergy.

Authors:  François Graham; Natacha Tardio; Louis Paradis; Anne Des Roches; Philippe Bégin
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Evaluation of oral immunotherapy efficacy and safety by maintenance dose dependency: A multicenter randomized study.

Authors:  Kiyotake Ogura; Noriyuki Yanagida; Sakura Sato; Takanori Imai; Komei Ito; Naoyuki Kando; Masanori Ikeda; Rumiko Shibata; Yoko Murakami; Takao Fujisawa; Mizuho Nagao; Norio Kawamoto; Naomi Kondo; Atsuo Urisu; Ikuya Tsuge; Yasuto Kondo; Kazuko Sugai; Osamu Uchida; Mitsuyoshi Urashima; Masami Taniguchi; Motohiro Ebisawa
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 4.084

Review 3.  Regulatory Requirements for the Quality of Allergen Products for Allergen Immunotherapy of Food Allergy.

Authors:  Lisa Englert; Vera Mahler; Andreas Bonertz
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 4.  Oral and sublingual immunotherapy for egg allergy.

Authors:  Olga Romantsik; Maria Angela Tosca; Simona Zappettini; Maria Grazia Calevo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-20

Review 5.  Oral Immunotherapy (OIT): A Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Francesca Mori; Simona Barni; Giulia Liccioli; Elio Novembre
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-10-13       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  Peanut Can Be Used as a Reference Allergen for Hazard Characterization in Food Allergen Risk Management: A Rapid Evidence Assessment and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Paul J Turner; Nandinee Patel; Barbara K Ballmer-Weber; Joe L Baumert; W Marty Blom; Simon Brooke-Taylor; Helen Brough; Dianne E Campbell; Hongbing Chen; R Sharon Chinthrajah; René W R Crevel; Anthony E J Dubois; Motohiro Ebisawa; Arnon Elizur; Jennifer D Gerdts; M Hazel Gowland; Geert F Houben; Jonathan O B Hourihane; André C Knulst; Sébastien La Vieille; María Cristina López; E N Clare Mills; Gustavo A Polenta; Natasha Purington; Maria Said; Hugh A Sampson; Sabine Schnadt; Eva Södergren; Stephen L Taylor; Benjamin C Remington
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2021-08-23

7.  Allergen immunotherapy and/or biologicals for IgE-mediated food allergy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Debra de Silva; Pablo Rodríguez Del Río; Nicolette W de Jong; Ekaterina Khaleva; Chris Singh; Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn; Antonella Muraro; Philippe Begin; Giovanni Pajno; Alessandro Fiocchi; Angel Sanchez; Carla Jones; Caroline Nilsson; Carsten Bindslev-Jensen; Gary Wong; Hugh Sampson; Kirsten Beyer; Mary-Jane Marchisotto; Montserrat Fernandez Rivas; Rosan Meyer; Susanne Lau; Ulugbek Nurmatov; Graham Roberts
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 14.710

Review 8.  New Perspectives in Food Allergy.

Authors:  Massimo De Martinis; Maria Maddalena Sirufo; Mariano Suppa; Lia Ginaldi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Oral Immunotherapy in Food Allergy: A Critical Pediatric Perspective.

Authors:  Aysegul Akarsu; Giulia Brindisi; Alessandro Fiocchi; Anna Maria Zicari; Stefania Arasi
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.418

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.