| Literature DB >> 28086989 |
Naoya Ishibashi1, Toshiya Maebayashi2, Takuya Aizawa2, Masakuni Sakaguchi2, Haruna Nishimaki3, Shinobu Masuda3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the breast cancer, the decision whether to administer adjuvant therapy is increasingly influenced by the Ki-67 proliferation index. In the present retrospective study, we investigated if this index could predict the therapeutic response to radiation therapy in small cell lung cancer (SCLC).Entities:
Keywords: Ki-67; Proliferation index; Radiation therapy; Response; Small cell lung cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28086989 PMCID: PMC5237196 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-016-0744-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiat Oncol ISSN: 1748-717X Impact factor: 3.481
Patient characteristics
| Patient no. | Sex | Age (yrs) | cstage | Ki-67 (%) | Radiation therapy | Chemotherapy | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fraction dose | Total dose | Schedule | Regimen | |||||
| 1 | M | 69 | IIIB | 79.77 | 1.5Gy/fr bid | 45Gy | Concurrent | Etoposide + carboplatin |
| 2 | M | 70 | IIA | 92.13 | 1.5Gy/fr bid | 45Gy | Neoadjuvant | Etoposide + cisplatin |
| 3 | M | 80 | IIIB | 75.87 | 1.5Gy/fr bid | 45Gy | Neoadjuvant | Etoposide + carboplatin |
| 4 | F | 69 | IIA | 66.41 | 2Gy/fr | 50Gy | None | |
| 5 | M | 68 | IIIB | 45.55 | 2Gy/fr | 50Gy | Neoadjuvant | Etoposide + cisplatin |
| 6 | M | 84 | IIIB | 74.84 | 2Gy/fr | 60Gy | None | |
| 7 | M | 72 | IIIA | 92.51 | 2Gy/fr | 60Gy | Neoadjuvant | Etoposide + cisplatin |
| 8 | M | 59 | IIIA | 74.81 | 1.5Gy/fr bid | 45Gy | Concurrent | Etoposide + cisplatin |
| 9 | M | 67 | IIIA | 99.21 | 1.5Gy/fr bid | 45Gy | Concurrent | Etoposide + carboplatin |
| 10 | M | 66 | IIIA | 95.74 | 1.5Gy/fr bid | 45Gy | Concurrent | Etoposide + cisplatin |
| 11 | M | 59 | IIIB | 89.2 | 1.5Gy/fr bid | 45Gy | Concurrent | Etoposide + cisplatin |
| 12 | M | 70 | IIA | 75.34 | 1.5Gy/fr bid | 45Gy | Concurrent | Etoposide + cisplatin |
| 13 | M | 81 | IIB | 72.79 | 3Gy/fr | 45Gy | None | |
| 14 | F | 74 | IIIB | 92.31 | 1.8Gy/fr | 50.4Gy | Concurrent | Etoposide + cisplatin |
| 15 | F | 78 | IIIB | 64.57 | 2Gy/fr | 50Gy | Neoadjuvant | Etoposide + cisplatin |
| 16 | M | 68 | IIIB | 78.02 | 2Gy/fr | 50Gy | Neoadjuvant | Etoposide + cisplatin |
| 17 | M | 69 | IIIA | 78.57 | 1.5Gy/fr bid | 45Gy | Concurrent | Etoposide + cisplatin |
| 18 | M | 73 | IIIA | 98.2 | 1.5Gy/fr bid | 45Gy | Concurrent | Etoposide + cisplatin |
| 19 | F | 74 | IIIA | 69.71 | 1.5Gy/fr bid | 45Gy | Neoadjuvant | Etoposide + cisplatin |
Abbreviations: M male, F female, bid twice daily, fr fraction
Fig. 1Histological examination of biopsy specimens from lung tumours. a Photomicrograph of haematoxylin and eosin-stained tumour section showing small cells with scant cytoplasm and granular nuclear chromatin (objective lens magnification, ×40). b Photomicrograph of tumour section immunostained for Ki-67 using the MIB-1 antibody clone, showing positive (green dots) or negative (red dots) cells based on pixel colour intensity. Some cells weakly stained brown were automatically assessed as not positive by the cell counting software
Ki-67 proliferation index and patient response to radiation therapy
| Group 1 (Ki-67 ≥ 79.77%) | Group 2 (Ki-67 < 79.77%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient no. | Ki-67 | Response | Patient no. | Ki-67 | Response |
| 1 | 79.77 | CR | 3 | 75.87 | CR |
| 2 | 92.13 | CR | 4 | 66.41 | CR |
| 7 | 92.51 | CR | 5 | 45.55 | PR |
| 9 | 99.21 | CR | 6 | 74.84 | PR |
| 10 | 95.74 | PR | 8 | 74.81 | CR |
| 11 | 89.2 | PR | 12 | 75.34 | PR |
| 14 | 92.31 | CR | 13 | 72.79 | PR |
| 18 | 98.2 | CR | 15 | 64.57 | PR |
| 16 | 78.02 | PR | |||
| 17 | 78.57 | PR | |||
| 19 | 69.71 | PR | |||
| CR rate 75.0% ( | CR rate 27.3% | ||||
Abbreviations: CR complete response, PR partial response
aχ2 test
Fig. 2Overall survival curves plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method for patients assigned to the two groups. There was no significant difference observed between the survival rate in groups 1 and 2