D Grønlund1,2, J L Poulsen1,2, T H Sandberg1, A E Olesen1,2,3, A Madzak4, K Krogh5, J B Frøkjaer2,4, A M Drewes1,2. 1. Mech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. 2. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. 3. Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 4. Mech-Sense, Department of Radiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. 5. Neurogastroenterology Unit, Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal symptoms are common in the general population and may originate from disturbances in gut motility. However, fundamental mechanistic understanding of motility remains inadequate, especially of the less accessible regions of the small bowel and colon. Hence, refinement and validation of objective methods to evaluate motility of the whole gut is important. Such techniques may be applied in clinical settings as diagnostic tools, in research to elucidate underlying mechanisms of diseases, and to evaluate how the gut responds to various drugs. A wide array of such methods exists; however, a limited number are used universally due to drawbacks like radiation exposure, lack of standardization, and difficulties interpreting data. In recent years, several new methods such as the 3D-Transit system and magnetic resonance imaging assessments on small bowel and colonic motility have emerged, with the advantages that they are less invasive, use no radiation, and provide much more detailed information. PURPOSE: This review outlines well-established and emerging methods to evaluate small bowel and colonic motility in clinical settings and in research. The latter include the 3D-Transit system, magnetic resonance imaging assessments, and high-resolution manometry. Procedures, indications, and the relative strengths and weaknesses of each method are summarized.
BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal symptoms are common in the general population and may originate from disturbances in gut motility. However, fundamental mechanistic understanding of motility remains inadequate, especially of the less accessible regions of the small bowel and colon. Hence, refinement and validation of objective methods to evaluate motility of the whole gut is important. Such techniques may be applied in clinical settings as diagnostic tools, in research to elucidate underlying mechanisms of diseases, and to evaluate how the gut responds to various drugs. A wide array of such methods exists; however, a limited number are used universally due to drawbacks like radiation exposure, lack of standardization, and difficulties interpreting data. In recent years, several new methods such as the 3D-Transit system and magnetic resonance imaging assessments on small bowel and colonic motility have emerged, with the advantages that they are less invasive, use no radiation, and provide much more detailed information. PURPOSE: This review outlines well-established and emerging methods to evaluate small bowel and colonic motility in clinical settings and in research. The latter include the 3D-Transit system, magnetic resonance imaging assessments, and high-resolution manometry. Procedures, indications, and the relative strengths and weaknesses of each method are summarized.
Authors: Jonathan Yde; Helene M Larsen; Søren Laurberg; Klaus Krogh; Hanne B Moeller Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Bart Hens; Patrick D Sinko; Nicholas Job; Meagan Dean; Jozef Al-Gousous; Niloufar Salehi; Robert M Ziff; Yasuhiro Tsume; Marival Bermejo; Paulo Paixão; James G Brasseur; Alex Yu; Arjang Talattof; Gail Benninghoff; Peter Langguth; Hans Lennernäs; William L Hasler; Luca Marciani; Joseph Dickens; Kerby Shedden; Duxin Sun; Gregory E Amidon; Gordon L Amidon Journal: Int J Pharm Date: 2018-06-23 Impact factor: 5.875
Authors: Theresa Meldgaard; Søren Schou Olesen; Adam D Farmer; Klaus Krogh; Anne Astrid Wendel; Birgitte Brock; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Christina Brock Journal: J Diabetes Res Date: 2018-09-16 Impact factor: 4.011
Authors: Jason R Baker; Joseph R Dickens; Mark Koenigsknecht; Ann Frances; Allen A Lee; Kerby A Shedden; James G Brasseur; Gordon L Amidon; Duxin Sun; William L Hasler Journal: J Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 4.924