| Literature DB >> 28085090 |
Deusiano Florêncio Dos Reis1, Ayala Eduardo Salazar2, Mayana Mendes Dias Machado3, Sheyla Regina Marques Couceiro4, Paula Benevides de Morais5,6.
Abstract
Generally, aquatic communities reflect the effects of anthropogenic changes such as deforestation or organic pollution. The Cerrado stands among the most threatened ecosystems by human activities in Brazil. In order to evaluate the ecological integrity of the streams in a preserved watershed in the Northern Cerrado biome corresponding to a mosaic of ecosystems in transition to the Amazonia biome in Brazil, biological metrics related to diversity, structure, and sensitivity of aquatic macroinvertebrates were calculated. Sampling included collections along stretches of 200 m of nine streams and measurements of abiotic variables (temperature, electrical conductivity, pH, total dissolved solids, dissolved oxygen, and discharge) and the Index of Habitat Integrity (HII). The values of the abiotic variables and the HII indicated that most of the streams have good ecological integrity, due to high oxygen levels and low concentrations of dissolved solids and electric conductivity. Two streams showed altered HII scores mainly related to small dams for recreational and domestic use, use of Cerrado natural pasture for cattle raising, and spot deforestation in bathing areas. However, this finding is not reflected in the biological metrics that were used. Considering all nine streams, only two showed satisfactory ecological quality (measured by Biological Monitoring Working Party (BMWP), total richness, and EPT (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera) richness), only one of which had a low HII score. These results indicate that punctual measures of abiotic parameters do not reveal the long-term impacts of anthropic activities in these streams, including related fire management of pasture that annually alters the vegetation matrix and may act as a disturbance for the macroinvertebrate communities. Due to this, biomonitoring of low order streams in Cerrado ecosystems of the Northern Central Brazil by different biotic metrics and also physical attributes of the riparian zone such as HII is recommended for the monitoring and control of anthropic impacts on aquatic communities.Entities:
Keywords: BMWP; EPT; HII; functional groups; macroinvertebrates
Year: 2017 PMID: 28085090 PMCID: PMC5371938 DOI: 10.3390/insects8010010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
Figure 1Map of the Taquaruçu Grande river basin showing the sampling points. Source: Bonatto, 2013.
Physical and chemical characterization of nine streams in the Taquaruçu Grande river basin, State of Tocantins, Brazil.
| Stream | Order | Channel Extension (m) | Width (cm) | Depth (cm) | Riparian Cover | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Type | Surrounding Cover Matrix | |||||
| Taq1 | 1 | 5872.78 | 37 | 10 | >100 m | Continuous forest | Dense Cerrado vegetation |
| Taq2 | 1 | 311.28 | 27 | 10 | 30–100 m | Continuous forest | Dense Cerrado vegetation |
| Taq3 | 1 | 1155.64 | 40 | 6 | >100 m | Continuous forest | Dense Cerrado vegetation |
| Taq4 | 1 | 630.63 | 54 | 5 | 5–30 m | Continuous forest | Cerrado savanna (herbaceous) |
| Taq5 | 2 | 1674.35 | 90 | 28 | 1–5 m | Open Cerrado forest | Cerrado savanna (herbaceous) |
| Taq6 | 1 | 648.22 | 44 | 8 | >100 m | Continuous forest | Dense Cerrado vegetation |
| Taq7 | 2 | 6304.74 | 170 | 22 | 5–30 m | Continuous forest | Pasture |
| Taq8 | 2 | 2942.65 | 100 | 12 | 1–5 m | Open savanna (shrubs) | Herbaceous vegetation with sparse shrubs |
| Taq9 | 2 | 6455.55 | 263 | 44 | 1–5 m | Open savanna (shrubs) | Herbaceous vegetation with sparse shrubs |
Physical and chemical characterization of nine streams in the Taquaruçu Grande river basin, State of Tocantins, Brazil. HII, Index of Habitat Integrity. OD = Dissolved Oxygen. STD = Total Dissolved Solids.
| Stream | Discharge (m3/s) | Temp. (°C) | OD (mg/L) | pH | C (µS/cm) | STD (ppm) | HII |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taq1 | 0.0028 | 24.7 | 8.48 | 5.28 | 20.0 | 10.0 | 0.92 |
| Taq2 | 0.0014 | 25.6 | 7.29 | 5.49 | 20.0 | 10.0 | 0.93 |
| Taq3 | 0.0012 | 23.1 | 8.06 | 4.90 | 20.0 | 10.0 | 0.92 |
| Taq4 | 0.0007 | 22.1 | 8.04 | 5.51 | 20.0 | 18.0 | 0.89 |
| Taq5 | 0.0188 | 23.2 | 8.25 | 5.92 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 0.88 |
| Taq6 | 0.0012 | 22.6 | 8.25 | 5.72 | 20.0 | 12.0 | 0.96 |
| Taq7 | 0.1271 | 22.8 | 8.22 | 5.89 | 20.0 | 10.0 | 0.81 |
| Taq8 | 0.0150 | 30.7 | 6.60 | 6.29 | 62.0 | 30.4 | 0.77 |
| Taq9 | 0.2038 | 24.9 | 8.54 | 5.69 | 90.0 | 60.0 | 0.56 |
| Standard deviation | 0.401 | 26.476 | 16.829 | 0.073 | 78.337 | 12.92 | * |
* Not calculated because this is a composite index. Note: Data is the mean of 10 measures in each stream.
Families of aquatic macroinvertebrates collected in nine streams at Taquaruçu Grande river basin, State of Tocantins, Brazil.
| Taxa | Frequency of Occurrence (%) | Relative Abundance (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coleoptera | Elmidae | 67 | 13.01 |
| Dryopidae | 44 | 7.64 | |
| Noteridae | 33 | 1.30 | |
| Ptylodactylidae | 22 | 0.49 | |
| Dytiscidae | 11 | 0.81 | |
| Hydrophilidae | 11 | 0.16 | |
| Gyrinidae | 11 | 0.16 | |
| Diptera | Simuliidae | 44 | 4.07 |
| Chironomidae | 44 | 1.95 | |
| Lepidoptera | Pyralidae | 11 | 0.16 |
| Trichoptera | Hydropsychidae | 67 | 10.08 |
| Leptoceridae | 56 | 15.93 | |
| Odontoceridae | 44 | 1.63 | |
| Calamoceratidae | 33 | 2.76 | |
| Ephemeroptera | Leptophlebiidae | 56 | 1.95 |
| Baetidae | 44 | 7.84 | |
| Euthyplociidae | 11 | 0.49 | |
| Plecoptera | Perlidae | 78 | 10.40 |
| Odonata | Gomphidae | 56 | 5.37 |
| Libellulidae | 44 | 1.79 | |
| Perilestidae | 22 | 0.81 | |
| Polythoridae | 22 | 0.49 | |
| Calopterygidae | 11 | 0.81 | |
| Coenagrionidae | 11 | 0.33 | |
| Hemiptera | Naucoridae | 11 | 0.81 |
| Veliidae | 44 | 0.81 | |
| Belostomatidae | 33 | 0.81 | |
| Notonectidae | 33 | 0.65 | |
| Gerridae | 11 | 0.49 | |
| Megaloptera | Corydalidae | 56 | 1.63 |
Results of Biological Monitoring Working Party (BMWP) [21] applied to nine streams of the Taquaruçu Grande river basin, State of Tocantins, Brazil.
| Stream | BMWP | BMWP Classification |
|---|---|---|
| Taq1 | 43 | Poor |
| Taq2 | 46 | Poor |
| Taq3 | 19 | Very poor |
| Taq4 | 36 | Poor |
| Taq5 | 37 | Poor |
| Taq6 | 44 | Poor |
| Taq7 | 97 | Good |
| Taq8 | 77 | Good |
| Taq9 | 31 | Poor |
Biological metrics of the macroinvertebrate fauna for the nine streams of Taquaruçu Grande river basin, State of Tocantins, Brazil. H: Shannon-Weiner index of diversity. J: Pielou index. EPT: Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera.
| Stream | Abundance | H | J | Total Richness | EPT Richness | EPT (%) | Ratio of EPT/Total | Ratio of Shredders | Ratio of Detritivores |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taq1 | 77 | 1.5 | 0.66 | 9 | 3 | 80.52 | 80.52 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Taq2 | 115 | 1.71 | 0.69 | 12 | 6 | 37.39 | 37.39 | 39.13 | 0.87 |
| Taq3 | 19 | 1.57 | 0.81 | 7 | 2 | 47.37 | 47.37 | 36.84 | 0.00 |
| Taq4 | 30 | 2.37 | 0.90 | 14 | 4 | 43.33 | 43.33 | 23.33 | 16.67 |
| Taq5 | 65 | 1.62 | 0.83 | 7 | 3 | 52.31 | 52.31 | 1.54 | 0.00 |
| Taq6 | 43 | 2.01 | 0.81 | 12 | 3 | 53.49 | 53.49 | 4.65 | 6.98 |
| Taq7 | 169 | 2.10 | 0.74 | 17 | 6 | 55.03 | 55.03 | 0.59 | 2.37 |
| Taq8 | 69 | 2.34 | 0.84 | 16 | 5 | 23.19 | 23.19 | 7.25 | 10.14 |
| Taq9 | 28 | 1.53 | 0.79 | 7 | 3 | 32.14 | 32.14 | 0.00 | 10.71 |
Correlations of BMWP with other studied biotic metrics based on macroinvertebrate fauna of nine streams of Taquaruçu Grande river basin, State of Tocantins, Brazil.
| Metrics | Abundance | H | J | Total Richness | EPT Richness | EPT (%) | Ratio of EPT/Total | Ratio of Shredders | Ratio of Detritivores | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | 0.808 | 0.550 | −0.160 | 0.836 | 0.775 | −0.077 | −0.077 | −0.384 | 0.002 | |
| 0.008 | 0.125 | 0.680 | 0.005 | 0.014 | 0.844 | 0.844 | 0.308 | 0.995 |
Note: Significant values in bold at 0.05. r = Pearson correlation, p = test of significance.
Correlations between metrics based on macroinvertebrate fauna and abiotic data, including the Habitat Integrity Index for nine streams of Taquaruçu Grande river basin, State of Tocantins, Brazil.
| Metrics | BMWP-Monteiro et al. (2008) [ | Ratio of Shredders | Ratio of Detritivores | Ratio of EPT/Total | Abundance | EPT (%) | H | J | Total Richness | EPT Richness | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | 0.348 | −0.063 | 0.123 | −0.525 | 0.082 | −0.525 | 0.182 | −0.070 | 0.263 | 0.336 | |
| p | 0.359 | 0.873 | 0.753 | 0.146 | 0.834 | 0.146 | 0.639 | 0.858 | 0.495 | 0.376 | |
| r | −0.379 | −0.366 | −0.134 | 0.642 | −0.170 | 0.642 | −0.505 | −0.143 | −0.523 | −0.555 | |
| p | 0.315 | 0.332 | 0.732 | 0.063 | 0.662 | 0.063 | 0.166 | 0.713 | 0.149 | 0.121 | |
| r | 0.669 | −0.572 | 0.308 | −0.430 | 0.336 | −0.430 | 0.541 | 0.285 | 0.528 | 0.487 | |
| p | 0.049 | 0.108 | 0.421 | 0.249 | 0.376 | 0.249 | 0.133 | 0.457 | 0.144 | 0.184 | |
| r | −0.106 | −0.308 | 0.562 | −0.571 | −0.364 | −0.571 | −0.042 | 0.213 | −0.170 | −0.116 | |
| p | 0.787 | 0.420 | 0.115 | 0.108 | 0.336 | 0.108 | 0.914 | 0.583 | 0.662 | 0.767 | |
| r | 0.031 | −0.291 | 0.491 | −0.608 | −0.271 | −0.608 | −0.003 | 0.125 | −0.063 | −0.022 | |
| p | 0.936 | 0.447 | 0.180 | 0.082 | 0.481 | 0.082 | 0.994 | 0.749 | 0.872 | 0.956 | |
| r | 0.212 | −0.460 | 0.182 | −0.234 | 0.159 | −0.234 | −0.162 | −0.088 | −0.061 | 0.099 | |
| p | 0.583 | 0.213 | 0.640 | 0.544 | 0.682 | 0.544 | 0.678 | 0.821 | 0.875 | 0.800 | |
| r | −0.128 | 0.412 | −0.398 | 0.512 | 0.088 | 0.512 | 0.051 | −0.120 | 0.077 | −0.045 | |
| p | 0.743 | 0.271 | 0.289 | 0.158 | 0.823 | 0.158 | 0.895 | 0.759 | 0.844 | 0.908 |