Literature DB >> 16332221

Developments in aquatic insect biomonitoring: a comparative analysis of recent approaches.

Núria Bonada1, Narcís Prat, Vincent H Resh, Bernhard Statzner.   

Abstract

Aquatic insects and other benthic invertebrates are the most widely used organisms in freshwater biomonitoring of human impact. Because of the high monetary investment in freshwater management, decisions are often based on biomonitoring results, and a critical and comparative review of different approaches is required. We used 12 criteria that should be fulfilled by an "ideal" biomonitoring tool, addressing the rationale, implementation, and performance of a method. After illustrating how the century-old but still widely used Saprobian system does not meet these criteria, we apply them to nine recent approaches that range from the suborganismal to the ecosystem level. Although significant progress has been made in the field, no recent approach meets all 12 criteria. Given that the use of biomonitoring information has important financial consequences, we suggest that societies and governments prioritize how these criteria should be ranked.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16332221     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol        ISSN: 0066-4170            Impact factor:   19.686


  62 in total

1.  Assessment of stream biological responses under multiple-stress conditions.

Authors:  Lise Comte; Sovan Lek; Eric de Deckere; Dick de Zwart; Muriel Gevrey
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Choice of macroinvertebrate metrics to evaluate stream conditions in Atlantic Forest, Brazil.

Authors:  Marcia Thais Suriano; Alaide A Fonseca-Gessner; Fabio O Roque; Claudio G Froehlich
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Exploring the Capacity of Water Framework Directive Indices to Assess Ecosystem Services in Fluvial and Riparian Systems: Towards a Second Implementation Phase.

Authors:  M R Vidal-Abarca; F Santos-Martín; B Martín-López; M M Sánchez-Montoya; M L Suárez Alonso
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Multinational, freshwater biomonitoring programs in the developing world: lessons learned from African and Southeast Asian river surveys.

Authors:  Vincent H Resh
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Which group is best? Attributes of different biological assemblages used in freshwater biomonitoring programs.

Authors:  Vincent H Resh
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Predicting the abundance of European stream macroinvertebrates using biological attributes.

Authors:  Bernhard Statzner; Núria Bonada; Sylvain Dolédec
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Evaluating macroinvertebrate biological metrics for ecological assessment of streams in northern Portugal.

Authors:  Simone G Varandas; Rui Manuel Vitor Cortes
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Critical technical elements of state bioassessment programs: a process to evaluate program rigor and comparability.

Authors:  Chris O Yoder; Michael T Barbour
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  In situ toxicity and ecological risk assessment of agro-pesticide runoff in the Madre de Dios River in Costa Rica.

Authors:  Silvia Echeverría-Sáenz; Freylan Mena; María Arias-Andrés; Seiling Vargas; Clemens Ruepert; Paul J Van den Brink; Luisa E Castillo; Jonas S Gunnarsson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Headwater Stream Microbial Diversity and Function across Agricultural and Urban Land Use Gradients.

Authors:  Sarah M Laperriere; Robert H Hilderbrand; Stephen R Keller; Regina Trott; Alyson E Santoro
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.