Kyoung Min Lee1,2, Se Joon Woo1,2, Jeong-Min Hwang1,2. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi, Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe a funduscopic sign that can be used to differentiate between optic disc drusen (ODD) and optic disc oedema (ODE). METHODS: A total of 73 eyes from 73 consecutive subjects with disc margin blurring who had been evaluated using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were included. Final diagnosis was made by SD-OCT; ODD was defined by direct visualization of ODD, while ODE was defined by documentation of retinal nerve fibre layer oedema (nasal retinal nerve fibre layer thickness >78.0 μm). Peripapillary retina was selected as a two-disc-diameter-sized square image from the fundus photograph. Using MATLAB software, colour photographs were converted to indexed image of eight colours. Presence of a smooth contour strip between the nasal disc margin and juxtapapillary retina was defined as a halo. Whether the halo could predict the ODD was analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: The halo sign was detected in 45 eyes (100%) with ODD including one eye with both ODD and ODE. No eyes with ODE alone showed the halo sign. The halo sign implied the presence of ODD (Cohen's kappa = 1.000, p < 0.001) and the absence of ODE (Cohen's kappa = 0.971, p < 0.001). The halo sign showed a good interobserver reliability [ICC (2, 1) = 0.944, 95% confidence interval 0.912-0.964]. SD-OCT images showed that halos represented retinal elevations above ODD. CONCLUSIONS: In the patients with blurred disc margin, the presence of a halo strongly suggested underlying ODD rather than ODE.
PURPOSE: To describe a funduscopic sign that can be used to differentiate between optic disc drusen (ODD) and optic disc oedema (ODE). METHODS: A total of 73 eyes from 73 consecutive subjects with disc margin blurring who had been evaluated using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were included. Final diagnosis was made by SD-OCT; ODD was defined by direct visualization of ODD, while ODE was defined by documentation of retinal nerve fibre layer oedema (nasal retinal nerve fibre layer thickness >78.0 μm). Peripapillary retina was selected as a two-disc-diameter-sized square image from the fundus photograph. Using MATLAB software, colour photographs were converted to indexed image of eight colours. Presence of a smooth contour strip between the nasal disc margin and juxtapapillary retina was defined as a halo. Whether the halo could predict the ODD was analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: The halo sign was detected in 45 eyes (100%) with ODD including one eye with both ODD and ODE. No eyes with ODE alone showed the halo sign. The halo sign implied the presence of ODD (Cohen's kappa = 1.000, p < 0.001) and the absence of ODE (Cohen's kappa = 0.971, p < 0.001). The halo sign showed a good interobserver reliability [ICC (2, 1) = 0.944, 95% confidence interval 0.912-0.964]. SD-OCT images showed that halos represented retinal elevations above ODD. CONCLUSIONS: In the patients with blurred disc margin, the presence of a halo strongly suggested underlying ODD rather than ODE.
Authors: Gema Rebolleda; Aki Kawasaki; Victoria de Juan; Noelia Oblanca; Francisco Jose Muñoz-Negrete Journal: Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 5.081