Sohi Bae1, Ho-Joon Lee1, Kyunghwa Han1, Yae-Won Park1, Yoon Seong Choi1, Sung Soo Ahn1, Jinna Kim1, Seung-Koo Lee2. 1. Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea. 2. Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea. SLEE@yuhs.ac.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship between the number of administrations of various gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) and increased T1 signal intensity in the globus pallidus (GP) and dentate nucleus (DN). METHODS: This retrospective study included 122 patients who underwent double-dose GBCA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Two radiologists calculated GP-to-thalamus (TH) signal intensity ratio, DN-to-pons signal intensity ratio and relative change (Rchange) between the baseline and final examinations. Interobserver agreement was evaluated. The relationships between Rchange and several factors, including number of each GBCA administrations, were analysed using a generalized additive model. RESULTS: Six patients (4.9%) received linear GBCAs (mean 20.8 number of administration; range 15-30), 44 patients (36.1%) received macrocyclic GBCAs (mean 26.1; range 14-51) and 72 patients (59.0%) received both types of GBCAs (mean 31.5; range 12-65). Interobserver agreement was almost perfect (0.99; 95% CI: 0.99-0.99). Rchange (DN:pons) was associated with gadodiamide (p = 0.006) and gadopentetate dimeglumine (p < 0.001), but not with other GBCAs. Rchange (GP:TH) was not associated with GBCA administration. CONCLUSIONS: Previous administration of linear agents gadoiamide and gadopentetate dimeglumine is associated with increased T1 signal intensity in the DN, whereas macrocyclic GBCAs do not show an association. KEY POINTS: • Certain linear GBCAs are associated with T1 signal change in the dentate nucleus. • The signal change is related to the administration number of certain linear GBCAs. • Difference in signal change may reflect differences in stability of agents.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship between the number of administrations of various gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) and increased T1 signal intensity in the globus pallidus (GP) and dentate nucleus (DN). METHODS: This retrospective study included 122 patients who underwent double-dose GBCA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Two radiologists calculated GP-to-thalamus (TH) signal intensity ratio, DN-to-pons signal intensity ratio and relative change (Rchange) between the baseline and final examinations. Interobserver agreement was evaluated. The relationships between Rchange and several factors, including number of each GBCA administrations, were analysed using a generalized additive model. RESULTS: Six patients (4.9%) received linear GBCAs (mean 20.8 number of administration; range 15-30), 44 patients (36.1%) received macrocyclic GBCAs (mean 26.1; range 14-51) and 72 patients (59.0%) received both types of GBCAs (mean 31.5; range 12-65). Interobserver agreement was almost perfect (0.99; 95% CI: 0.99-0.99). Rchange (DN:pons) was associated with gadodiamide (p = 0.006) and gadopentetate dimeglumine (p < 0.001), but not with other GBCAs. Rchange (GP:TH) was not associated with GBCA administration. CONCLUSIONS: Previous administration of linear agents gadoiamide and gadopentetate dimeglumine is associated with increased T1 signal intensity in the DN, whereas macrocyclic GBCAs do not show an association. KEY POINTS: • Certain linear GBCAs are associated with T1 signal change in the dentate nucleus. • The signal change is related to the administration number of certain linear GBCAs. • Difference in signal change may reflect differences in stability of agents.
Authors: Hong Yuan; M Waleed Gaber; Kelli Boyd; Christy M Wilson; Mohammad F Kiani; Thomas E Merchant Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-11-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Nozomu Murata; Luis F Gonzalez-Cuyar; Kiyoko Murata; Corinne Fligner; Russell Dills; Daniel Hippe; Kenneth R Maravilla Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Carlo C Quattrocchi; Joana Ramalho; Aart J van der Molen; Àlex Rovira; Alexander Radbruch Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-11-09 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Elka Miller; Emilio J Inarejos Clemente; Nikolay Tzaribachev; Saurabh Guleria; Mirkamal Tolend; Arthur B Meyers; Thekla von Kalle; Jennifer Stimec; Bernd Koos; Simone Appenzeller; Linda Z Arvidsson; Eva Kirkhus; Andrea S Doria; Christian J Kellenberger; Tore A Larheim Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2018-05-08
Authors: Joanna M Liu; Alexander Liu; Joana Leal; Fiona McMillan; Jane Francis; Andreas Greiser; Oliver J Rider; Saul Myerson; Stefan Neubauer; Vanessa M Ferreira; Stefan K Piechnik Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2017-09-28 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Axel Montagne; Mikko T Huuskonen; Gautham Rajagopal; Melanie D Sweeney; Daniel A Nation; Farshid Sepehrband; Lina M D'Orazio; Michael G Harrington; Helena C Chui; Meng Law; Arthur W Toga; Berislav V Zlokovic Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Sean M Lang; Tarek Alsaied; Ryan A Moore; Mantosh Rattan; Thomas D Ryan; Michael D Taylor Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-07-18 Impact factor: 2.357