Literature DB >> 26863577

Macrocyclic and Other Non-Group 1 Gadolinium Contrast Agents Deposit Low Levels of Gadolinium in Brain and Bone Tissue: Preliminary Results From 9 Patients With Normal Renal Function.

Nozomu Murata1, Luis F Gonzalez-Cuyar, Kiyoko Murata, Corinne Fligner, Russell Dills, Daniel Hippe, Kenneth R Maravilla.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether gadolinium (Gd) is deposited in brain and bone tissues in patients receiving only non-Group 1 agents, either macrocyclic or linear protein interacting Gd-based contrast agents, with normal renal function. Group 1 agents are linear agents most associated with nephrogenic systemic fibrosis that the US Federal Drug Administration has defined as contraindicated in patients at risk for this disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was institutional review board approved and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant for retrospective review of records and also had signed autopsy consent authorizing use of decedent's tissue in research studies. Tissue samples were collected from 9 decedents undergoing autopsy who had contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with only single agent exposure to a non-Group 1 Gd-based contrast agent. Decedents with only noncontrast MRI or no MRI served as controls. Multiple brain areas, including globus pallidus and dentate nucleus, as well as bone and skin, were sampled and analyzed for Gd using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Gadolinium levels were compared between groups of decedents using the Mann-Whitney test and between brain and bone tissues of the same cases using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
RESULTS: Of the 9 decedents, 5 received gadoteridol (ProHance; Bracco Diagnostics, Princeton, NJ), 2 received gadobutrol (Gadovist; Bayer Healthcare, Whippany, NJ), and 1 each had gadobenate (MultiHance; Bracco Diagnostics) and gadoxetate (Eovist; Bayer Healthcare). Gadolinium was found with all agents in all brain areas sampled with highest levels in globus pallidus and dentate. Bone levels measured 23 times higher (median) than brain levels (P = 0.008 for bone vs globus pallidus) and showed a significant correlation (r = 0.81, P = 0.022). In controls, Gd levels in the brain were at or below limits of measurement and were significantly lower compared with study cases (P = 0.005 for globus pallidus).
CONCLUSION: Gadolinium deposition in normal brain and bone tissue occurs with macrocyclic and linear protein interacting agents in patients with normal renal function. Deposition of Gd in cortical bone occurs at much higher levels compared with brain tissue and shows a notable correlation between the two. Thus, the bone may serve as a surrogate to estimate brain deposition if brain Gd were to become a useful clinical or research marker.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26863577     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  112 in total

Review 1.  The biological fate of gadolinium-based MRI contrast agents: a call to action for bioinorganic chemists.

Authors:  Mariane Le Fur; Peter Caravan
Journal:  Metallomics       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 4.526

2.  Gadolinium deposition in the brain: association with various GBCAs using a generalized additive model.

Authors:  Sohi Bae; Ho-Joon Lee; Kyunghwa Han; Yae-Won Park; Yoon Seong Choi; Sung Soo Ahn; Jinna Kim; Seung-Koo Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Gadolinium-based contrast agents in pediatric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Eric M Gale; Peter Caravan; Anil G Rao; Robert J McDonald; Matthew Winfeld; Robert J Fleck; Michael S Gee
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-04-13

4.  Comparative study of pulsed-continuous arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging by histogram analysis in evaluation of glial tumors.

Authors:  Atsuko Arisawa; Yoshiyuki Watanabe; Hisashi Tanaka; Hiroto Takahashi; Chisato Matsuo; Takuya Fujiwara; Masahiro Fujiwara; Yasunori Fujimoto; Noriyuki Tomiyama
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Do we need gadolinium-based contrast medium for brain magnetic resonance imaging in children?

Authors:  Dennis Dünger; Matthias Krause; Daniel Gräfe; Andreas Merkenschlager; Christian Roth; Ina Sorge
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-04-06

6.  Brain tissue gadolinium retention in pediatric patients after contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance exams: pathological confirmation.

Authors:  A Luana Stanescu; Dennis W Shaw; Nozomu Murata; Kiyoko Murata; Joe C Rutledge; Ezekiel Maloney; Kenneth R Maravilla
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2020-01-27

7.  Effects of serial macrocyclic-based contrast materials gadoterate meglumine and gadobutrol administrations on gadolinium-related dentate nuclei signal increases in unenhanced T1-weighted brain: a retrospective study in 158 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.

Authors:  Alessandra Splendiani; Marco Perri; Claudia Marsecano; Valentina Vellucci; Giulia Michelini; Antonio Barile; Ernesto Di Cesare
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 8.  Gadolinium deposition and the potential for toxicological sequelae - A literature review of issues surrounding gadolinium-based contrast agents.

Authors:  Kerry A Layne; Paul I Dargan; John R H Archer; David M Wood
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Gadolinium-based contrast agents in children.

Authors:  Michael N Rozenfeld; Daniel J Podberesky
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-08-04

Review 10.  Chemistry of MRI Contrast Agents: Current Challenges and New Frontiers.

Authors:  Jessica Wahsner; Eric M Gale; Aurora Rodríguez-Rodríguez; Peter Caravan
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 60.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.