Literature DB >> 28083322

Mental Health Retrosight: Understanding the Returns From Research (Lessons From Schizophrenia): Policy Report.

Steven Wooding, Alexandra Pollitt, Sophie Castle-Clarke, Gavin Cochrane, Stephanie Diepeveen, Susan Guthrie, Marcela Horvitz-Lennon, Vincent Larivière, Molly Morgan Jones, Siobhan Ni Chonaill, Claire O'Brien, Stuart S Olmsted, Dana Schultz, Eleanor Winpenny, Harold Alan Pincus, Jonathan Grant.   

Abstract

This study examines the impacts arising from neuroscience and mental health research going back 20-25 years, and identifies attributes of the research, researchers or research setting that are associated with translation into patient benefit, in the particular case of schizophrenia. The study combined two methods: forward-tracing case studies to examine where scientific advances of 20 years ago have led to impact today; and backward-tracing perspectives to identify the research antecedents of today's interventions in schizophrenia. These research and impact trails are followed principally in Canada, the UK and the USA. The headline findings are as follows: The case studies and perspectives support the view that mental health research has led to a diverse and beneficial range of academic, health, social and economic impacts over the 20 years since the research was undertaken.Clinical research has had a larger impact on patient care than basic research has over the 20 years since the research was undertaken.Those involved in mental health research who work across boundaries are associated with wider health and social benefits.Committed individuals, motivated by patient need, who effectively champion research agendas and/or translation into practice are key in driving the development and implementation of interventions.This study provides an overview of the methods and presents the full set of findings, with the policy provocations they raise, and an emerging research agenda. It has been written for funders of biomedical and health research and health services, health researchers, and policymakers in those fields. It will also be of interest to those involved in research and impact evaluation.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 28083322      PMCID: PMC5051976     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rand Health Q        ISSN: 2162-8254


  5 in total

Review 1.  How can payback from health services research be assessed?

Authors:  M Buxton; S Hanney
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1996-01

2.  Mental Health Retrosight: Understanding the Returns From Research (Lessons From Schizophrenia): Policy Report.

Authors:  Steven Wooding; Alexandra Pollitt; Sophie Castle-Clarke; Gavin Cochrane; Stephanie Diepeveen; Susan Guthrie; Marcela Horvitz-Lennon; Vincent Larivière; Molly Morgan Jones; Siobhan Ni Chonaill; Claire O'Brien; Stuart S Olmsted; Dana Schultz; Eleanor Winpenny; Harold Alan Pincus; Jonathan Grant
Journal:  Rand Health Q       Date:  2014-03-01

3.  In Search of the Holy Grail: Understanding Research Success.

Authors:  Jonathan Grant; Steven Wooding
Journal:  Rand Health Q       Date:  2012-12-01

4.  Translating scientific opportunity into public health impact: a strategic plan for research on mental illness.

Authors:  Thomas R Insel
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2009-02

Review 5.  The molecular medicine revolution and psychiatry: bridging the gap between basic neuroscience research and clinical psychiatry.

Authors:  Todd D Gould; Husseini K Manji
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.384

  5 in total
  7 in total

1.  Mental Health Retrosight: Understanding the Returns From Research (Lessons From Schizophrenia): Policy Report.

Authors:  Steven Wooding; Alexandra Pollitt; Sophie Castle-Clarke; Gavin Cochrane; Stephanie Diepeveen; Susan Guthrie; Marcela Horvitz-Lennon; Vincent Larivière; Molly Morgan Jones; Siobhan Ni Chonaill; Claire O'Brien; Stuart S Olmsted; Dana Schultz; Eleanor Winpenny; Harold Alan Pincus; Jonathan Grant
Journal:  Rand Health Q       Date:  2014-03-01

2.  Evidence-based science policy for mental health in a post-truth era.

Authors:  Harold Alan Pincus; Stephanie A Rolin
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 27.083

Review 3.  Evidence appraisal: a scoping review, conceptual framework, and research agenda.

Authors:  Andrew Goldstein; Eric Venker; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  ISRIA statement: ten-point guidelines for an effective process of research impact assessment.

Authors:  Paula Adam; Pavel V Ovseiko; Jonathan Grant; Kathryn E A Graham; Omar F Boukhris; Anne-Maree Dowd; Gert V Balling; Rikke N Christensen; Alexandra Pollitt; Mark Taylor; Omar Sued; Saba Hinrichs-Krapels; Maite Solans-Domènech; Heidi Chorzempa
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2018-02-08

5.  Mechanisms and pathways to impact in public health research: a preliminary analysis of research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR).

Authors:  Harriet Boulding; Adam Kamenetzky; Ioana Ghiga; Becky Ioppolo; Facundo Herrera; Sarah Parks; Catriona Manville; Susan Guthrie; Saba Hinrichs-Krapels
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 6.  Evaluating cancer research impact: lessons and examples from existing reviews on approaches to research impact assessment.

Authors:  Catherine R Hanna; Kathleen A Boyd; Robert J Jones
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2021-03-11

7.  EVITA 2.0, an updated framework for understanding evidence-based mental health policy agenda-setting: tested and informed by key informant interviews in a multilevel comparative case study.

Authors:  Nicole Votruba; Jonathan Grant; Graham Thornicroft
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2021-03-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.