| Literature DB >> 28082809 |
Yao Cheng1, Xian-Ze Xiong1, Rong-Xing Zhou1, Yi-Lei Deng1, Yan-Wen Jin1, Jiong Lu1, Fu-Yu Li1, Nan-Sheng Cheng1.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the feasibility of repairing a common bile duct defect with a decellularized ureteral graft in a porcine model.Entities:
Keywords: Bile duct injury; Biliary reconstruction; Decellularization; Stent; Ureteral graft
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28082809 PMCID: PMC5192268 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i48.10575
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Gastroenterol ISSN: 1007-9327 Impact factor: 5.742
Figure 1Appearance and structure of a graft used in common bile duct reconstruction. A: The decellularized ureteral graft is over a stent. B: Scanning electron microscope photogram shows porous extracellular matrix and collagen fibers. Scanning bar indicates 100 μm.
Figure 2Surgical technique of common bile duct reconstruction. A: The common bile duct defect was reconstructed with a 2 cm long decellularized ureteral graft over the lower limb of the T-tube (T-tube group); B: The defect was reconstructed with a graft over an intraluminal stent (stent group); C: The defect was reconstructed with a graft alone without any T-tube or intraluminal stent insertion (stentless group).
Figure 3Survival rates. All animals in the T-tube group and stent group survived until their sacrifice after 3 mo. In stentless group, all of the animals died in 2 mo.
Post-operative complications in animals
| Bile leakage | 0/6 | 0/6 | 1/6 |
| Biliary stricture | 0/6 | 1/6 | 6/6 |
| Hepatolithiasis | 0/6 | 0/6 | 3/6 |
Biochemical results of animals in each group
| Total bilirubin (μmol/L) | 1.7-8.5 | T-tube | 3.0 ± 0.3 | 3.2 ± 0.3 | 3.3 ± 0.4 |
| Stent | 3.2 ± 0.5 | 3.4 ± 0.5 | 3.6 ± 0.5 | ||
| Stentless | 68.2 ± 15.1 | 106.3 ± 29.2 | NA | ||
| Alanine aminotransferase (IU/L) | 15.0-66.0 | T-tube | 35.2 ± 12.6 | 30.1 ± 5.3 | 36.1 ± 10.3 |
| Stent | 34.3 ± 12.1 | 32.1 ± 6.2 | 33.2 ± 7.2 | ||
| Stentless | 122.5 ± 35.1 | 209.5 ± 35.4 | NA | ||
| Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (IU/L) | 10.0-88.0 | T-tube | 51.2 ± 7.2 | 50.1 ± 5.3 | 48.8 ± 6.6 |
| Stent | 47.1 ± 5.3 | 52.1 ± 6.2 | 52.0 ± 10.6 | ||
| Stentless | 233.4 ± 61.5 | 265.8 ± 82.6 | NA |
P < 0.05, stent group vs stentless group;
P < 0.05, T-tube group vs stentless group. NA: Not available.
Figure 4Postoperative cholangiography. A: Cholangiography of a survivor in the T-tube group performed at 3 mo; B: Cholangiography of a survivor in the stent group performed at 3 mo. Arrows indicate the area of graft interposition. There is no evidence of biliary stricture formation. There is no sign of proximal dilatation or biliary obstruction.
Figure 5Macroscopic results. A: Explanted bile duct of a 3-mo survivor in the T-tube group; B: Explanted bile duct of a 3-mo survivor in the stent group; C: Explanted bile duct of an animal who died at 1 mo in the stentless group. Brackets indicate the area of graft interposition.
Figure 6Hematoxylin/eosin staining of the graft site. A: H&E staining of a 3-mo survivor in the T-tube group; B: H&E staining of a 3-mo survivor in the stent group; C: H&E staining of an animal who died at 1 mo in the stentless group. Scale bar indicates 100 μm. H&E: Hematoxylin/eosin.
Figure 7Cytokeratin 19 immunofluorescent staining of the graft site. A: CK19 staining of a 3-mo survivor in the T-tube group; B: CK19 staining of a 3-mo survivor in the stent group; C: CK19 staining of an animal who died at 1 mo in the stentless group. Scale bar indicates 20 μm. CK19: Cytokeratin 19.