BACKGROUND: Porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) biograft is used as a bioscaffold for regeneration of a variety of tissues. To date, SIS has not been used as a biliary tract graft. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using SIS as a scaffold for bile duct tissue regeneration in a canine model. METHODS: Fifteen, 25- to 35-kg mongrel dogs underwent midline laparotomy and exposure of the common bile duct. Nine dogs had a longitudinal choledochotomy and a 2- x 1-cm elliptical patch of 4-ply SIS placed using 6-0 polypropylene suture. Six dogs had the anterior two thirds of the bile duct resected and a 2- to 3-cm tubularized 4-ply SIS interposition graft placed. Dogs were killed at intervals ranging from 2 weeks to 5 months. Before killing, liver function tests (alkaline phosphatase [U/L] and total bilirubin [mg/dL]) were evaluated, cholangiograms were performed, and the bile duct was examined histologically. RESULTS: Fourteen out of 15 dogs survived and were healthy at the time of killing. The one failure was a result of a bile leak in a patched animal. The SIS showed signs of incorporation with infiltration of native fibroblasts, blood vessels, and biliary mucosa within 2 weeks. Within 3 months the SIS graft was replaced with native collagen covered with a biliary epithelium. No changes occurred at 5-month follow-up. One animal with an interposition graft developed a stricture at the proximal anastomosis within 2 months. In the remaining dogs, liver enzymes were normal, and the caliber of the common bile duct remained normal. CONCLUSIONS: SIS can be used for regeneration of bile duct tissue in a canine model. In 13 of 15 dogs SIS resulted in regeneration of canine common bile duct when used as a patch or as an interposition graft. The potential for the use of SIS as a patch for biliary stricturoplasty, or as an interposition graft for repair of complex biliary injuries is encouraging.
BACKGROUND: Porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) biograft is used as a bioscaffold for regeneration of a variety of tissues. To date, SIS has not been used as a biliary tract graft. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using SIS as a scaffold for bile duct tissue regeneration in a canine model. METHODS: Fifteen, 25- to 35-kg mongrel dogs underwent midline laparotomy and exposure of the common bile duct. Nine dogs had a longitudinal choledochotomy and a 2- x 1-cm elliptical patch of 4-ply SIS placed using 6-0 polypropylene suture. Six dogs had the anterior two thirds of the bile duct resected and a 2- to 3-cm tubularized 4-ply SIS interposition graft placed. Dogs were killed at intervals ranging from 2 weeks to 5 months. Before killing, liver function tests (alkaline phosphatase [U/L] and total bilirubin [mg/dL]) were evaluated, cholangiograms were performed, and the bile duct was examined histologically. RESULTS: Fourteen out of 15 dogs survived and were healthy at the time of killing. The one failure was a result of a bile leak in a patched animal. The SIS showed signs of incorporation with infiltration of native fibroblasts, blood vessels, and biliary mucosa within 2 weeks. Within 3 months the SIS graft was replaced with native collagen covered with a biliary epithelium. No changes occurred at 5-month follow-up. One animal with an interposition graft developed a stricture at the proximal anastomosis within 2 months. In the remaining dogs, liver enzymes were normal, and the caliber of the common bile duct remained normal. CONCLUSIONS: SIS can be used for regeneration of bile duct tissue in a canine model. In 13 of 15 dogs SIS resulted in regeneration of canine common bile duct when used as a patch or as an interposition graft. The potential for the use of SIS as a patch for biliary stricturoplasty, or as an interposition graft for repair of complex biliary injuries is encouraging.
Authors: Peter Nau; James Liu; E Christopher Ellison; Jeffrey W Hazey; Matthew Henn; Peter Muscarella; Vimal K Narula; W Scott Melvin Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2011-06-27 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Theodore J Cios; Kevin M Reavis; David R Renton; Jeffrey W Hazey; Dean J Mikami; Vimal K Narula; Matthew T Allemang; S Scott Davis; W Scott Melvin Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2007-08-19 Impact factor: 4.584