Literature DB >> 28082173

Balancing thromboembolic and bleeding risk with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs): A systematic review and meta-analysis on gender differences.

Marco Proietti1, Paola Cheli2, Stefania Basili3, Michal Mazurek4, Gregory Y H Lip5.   

Abstract

Sex and gender differences have been reported in atrial fibrillation (AF), especially in relation to differences in thromboembolic and bleeding risks. More recently, pharmacological treatments have changed following the introduction of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) progressively replacing vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The aims of this systematic review are to summarize the available evidence on NOACs and the relationship to major adverse outcomes according to sex. Moreover, we performed a meta-analysis of data from the phase III clinical trials investigating the sex effect on stroke/systemic embolic events (SEE) and major bleeding. Our literature review found small differences in NOACs efficacy and safety between male and female patients, even if so far available literature is limited to post-hoc ancillary analyses from randomized trials and one cohort study. Meta-analysis from NOAC trials found a differential effect of NOACs, with male patients being more protected from stroke/SEE and female patients more protected from major bleeding events. Further data are needed to fully elucidate sex differences in AF patients treated with NOACs.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Gender; Major bleeding; Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants; Stroke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28082173     DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Res        ISSN: 1043-6618            Impact factor:   7.658


  5 in total

1.  Atrial fibrillation and human immunodeficiency virus type-1 infection: a systematic review. Implications for anticoagulant and antiarrhythmic therapy.

Authors:  Daniele Pastori; Ivano Mezzaroma; Pasquale Pignatelli; Francesco Violi; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Sex Differences in Efficacy and Safety After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A 4.3-Year Follow-Up Analysis.

Authors:  Yuyi Chen; Yonghua Zhang; Lulu Qu; Chunyu Chen; Xi Su; Yanhong Chen
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-18

Review 3.  Sex Differences in Atrial Fibrillation-Update on Risk Assessment, Treatment, and Long-Term Risk.

Authors:  Charlotte J Bai; Nidhi Madan; Shaza Alshahrani; Neelum T Aggarwal; Annabelle Santos Volgman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-08-27

Review 4.  Women and atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Annabelle Santos Volgman; Emelia J Benjamin; Anne B Curtis; Margaret C Fang; Kathryn J Lindley; Gerald V Naccarelli; Carl J Pepine; Odayme Quesada; Marmar Vaseghi; Albert L Waldo; Nanette K Wenger; Andrea M Russo
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Sex differences in treatment strategy and adverse outcomes among patients 75 and older with atrial fibrillation in the MarketScan database.

Authors:  Vinita Subramanya; J'Neka S Claxton; Pamela L Lutsey; Richard F MacLehose; Lin Y Chen; Alanna M Chamberlain; Faye L Norby; Alvaro Alonso
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 2.298

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.