Literature DB >> 28082075

Vertebral fractures assessment in children: Evaluation of DXA imaging versus conventional spine radiography.

N J Crabtree1, S Chapman2, W Högler3, K Hodgson4, D Chapman5, N Bebbington5, N J Shaw3.   

Abstract

Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) by DXA is an accepted tool in adults. However, its use in children has not been assessed. The aim of this study was to evaluate DXA VFA and morphometric analysis (MXA) using a GE Lunar iDXA bone densitometer against spinal radiographic assessment (RA) for the identification of vertebral fractures in children. Spine RA and VFA (T3-L5) were acquired on the same day in 80 children. Forty children considered high risk for fracture by their metabolic bone specialist were referred for spinal RA. Another 40 children were recruited as part of a prospective fracture study and were considered low risk for vertebral fracture. Agreement between RA and VFA was assessed by an expert paediatric radiologist and two paediatricians with expertise in bone pathology. Agreement between RA and MXA was assessed by an expert paediatric radiologist, two clinical scientists and an experienced paediatric radiographer. Vertebrae were ranked as normal, mild, moderate or severe if they had <10%, 11-25%, 26-50% and >50% deformity, respectively. Levels of agreement were calculated using the Cohen kappa score. Evaluating the data from all readable vertebrae, 121 mild, 44 moderate and 16 severe vertebral fractures were identified; with 26, 8, and 5 subjects having at least one mild, moderate or severe fracture, respectively. Depending on rater, 92.8-94.8% of the vertebrae were evaluable by RA. In contrast, 98.4% were evaluable by VFA and only 83.6% were evaluable by MXA. Moderate agreement was found between raters for RA [kappa 0.526-0.592], and VFA [kappa 0.601-0.658] and between RA and VFA [kappa 0.630-0.687]. In contrast, only slight agreement was noted between raters for MXA [kappa 0.361-0.406] and between VFA and MXA [kappa 0.137-0.325]. Agreement substantially improved if the deformities were dichotomised as normal or mild versus moderate or severe [kappa 0.826-0.834]. For the detection of moderate and/or severe fractures the sensitivities & specificities were 81.3% & 99.3%, and 62.5% & 99.2% for VFA and MXA, respectively. This study demonstrates that VFA is as good as RA for detecting moderate and severe vertebral fractures. Given the significant radiation dose saving of VFA compared with RA, VFA is recommended as a diagnostic tool for the assessment of moderate or severe vertebral fracture in children. Crown
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone density; DXA; Fracture; Paediatric; Vertebral fracture assessment; X-ray

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28082075     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  9 in total

Review 1.  The Utility of DXA Assessment at the Forearm, Proximal Femur, and Lateral Distal Femur, and Vertebral Fracture Assessment in the Pediatric Population: 2019 ISCD Official Position.

Authors:  David R Weber; Alison Boyce; Catherine Gordon; Wolfgang Högler; Heidi H Kecskemethy; Madhusmita Misra; Diana Swolin-Eide; Peter Tebben; Leanne M Ward; Halley Wasserman; Christopher Shuhart; Babette S Zemel
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.617

2.  Definition of Normal Vertebral Morphometry Using NHANES-II Radiographs.

Authors:  John A Hipp; Trevor F Grieco; Patrick Newman; Charles A Reitman
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2022-09-27

Review 3.  Diagnosis and management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, part 2: respiratory, cardiac, bone health, and orthopaedic management.

Authors:  David J Birnkrant; Katharine Bushby; Carla M Bann; Benjamin A Alman; Susan D Apkon; Angela Blackwell; Laura E Case; Linda Cripe; Stasia Hadjiyannakis; Aaron K Olson; Daniel W Sheehan; Julie Bolen; David R Weber; Leanne M Ward
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 4.  Bone Health in Childhood Chronic Disease.

Authors:  David R Weber
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.741

5.  Lumbar spine bone mineral density Z-score discrepancies by dual X-ray absorptiometry do not predict vertebral fractures in children.

Authors:  Tasma Harindhanavudhi; Anna Petryk; Richard Jones; Amanda Regodón Wallin; James S Hodges; Sara Van Nortwick; Bradley S Miller; Tara L Holm; Kyriakie Sarafoglou
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in children.

Authors:  Fawaz F Alqahtani; Amaka C Offiah
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-11-12

7.  Are semi-automated software program designed for adults accurate for the identification of vertebral fractures in children?

Authors:  Fawaz F Alqahtani; Fabrizio Messina; Amaka C Offiah
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Osteoporosis in children and adolescents: when to suspect and how to diagnose it.

Authors:  Silvia Ciancia; Rick R van Rijn; Wolfgang Högler; Natasha M Appelman-Dijkstra; Annemieke M Boot; Theo C J Sas; Judith S Renes
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.860

Review 9.  Current and emerging artificial intelligence applications for pediatric musculoskeletal radiology.

Authors:  Amaka C Offiah
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-07-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.