Literature DB >> 28080154

Biocompatibility assessments for medical devices - evolving regulatory considerations.

Lesley Reeve1, Paul Baldrick1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Biocompatibility assessment provides key data supporting medical device development and marketing. Although regional and international guidance is available, differences in proposed biocompatibility assessments or test methods lead to confusion and inefficiencies in generating the package of supporting nonclinical data. Areas covered: Modifications to available guidance for biological safety testing of medical devices, as described by the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), have, over time, sometimes increased and sometimes decreased the level of harmonisation in testing requirements. These requirements continue to evolve, as shown by refinements and supplements to existing ISO 10,993 standards, new ISO standards under development and new finalised guidance from the FDA - which shows a shift away from routine testing-based approaches and much greater emphasis on characterisation, with use of existing literature or demonstration of equivalence to established comparator products, where possible. Expert commentary: This article examines the impact of recent changes in guidance for biocompatibility assessment of new medical devices and shows that, although a high level of consistency now occurs in ISO and FDA requirements, there are still areas where a 'standard approach' is not possible, allowing hurdles for global development of medical devices to persist.

Keywords:  Biocompatibility; biological evaluation; biological safety; medical device; non-clinical testing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28080154     DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2017.1280392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices        ISSN: 1743-4440            Impact factor:   3.166


  5 in total

Review 1.  Principles of TAVR valve design, modelling, and testing.

Authors:  Oren M Rotman; Matteo Bianchi; Ram P Ghosh; Brandon Kovarovic; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.166

2.  Regulatory considerations for animal studies of biomaterial products.

Authors:  Maobo Cheng; Wenbo Liu; Jiazhen Zhang; Song Zhang; Zhaojun Guo; Lu Liu; Jiaxin Tian; Xiangmei Zhang; Jin Cheng; Yinghui Liu; Gang Deng; Guobiao Gao; Lei Sun
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-10-02

3.  PreS/MD: Predictor of Sensitization Hazard for Chemical Substances Released From Medical Devices.

Authors:  Vinicius M Alves; Joyce V B Borba; Rodolpho C Braga; Daniel R Korn; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Kevin Causey; Alexander Tropsha; Diego Rua; Eugene N Muratov
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 4.109

Review 4.  Manufacturing artificial bone allografts: a perspective.

Authors:  Emma Steijvers; Armaan Ghei; Zhidao Xia
Journal:  Biomater Transl       Date:  2022-03-28

Review 5.  Acute intraocular toxicity caused by perfluorocarbon liquids: safety control systems of medical devices.

Authors:  Girish K Srivastava; Vivekanandan Kalaiselvan; Cristina Andrés-Iglesias; Shatrunajay Shukla; Rohit Saxena; Jose Carlos Pastor
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 3.535

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.