Literature DB >> 28079702

Radiomic Analysis Reveals Prognostic Information in T1-Weighted Baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Glioblastoma.

Michael Ingrisch1, Moritz Jörg Schneider, Dominik Nörenberg, Giovanna Negrao de Figueiredo, Klaus Maier-Hein, Bogdana Suchorska, Ulrich Schüller, Nathalie Albert, Hartmut Brückmann, Maximilian Reiser, Jörg-Christian Tonn, Birgit Ertl-Wagner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether radiomic analysis with random survival forests (RSFs) can predict overall survival from T1-weighted contrast-enhanced baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in a cohort of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients with uniform treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and informed consent was waived. The MRI scans from 66 patients with newly diagnosed GBM from a previous prospective study were analyzed. Tumors were segmented manually on contrast-enhanced 3-dimensional T1-weighted images. Using these segmentations, P = 208 quantitative image features characterizing tumor shape, signal intensity, and texture were calculated in an automated fashion. On this data set, an RSF was trained using 10-fold cross validation to establish a link between image features and overall survival, and the individual risk for each patient was predicted. The mean concordance index was assessed as a measure of prediction accuracy. Association of individual risk with overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and a univariate proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: Mean overall survival was 14 months (range, 0.8-85 months). Mean concordance index of the 10-fold cross-validated RSF was 0.67. Kaplan-Meier analysis clearly distinguished 2 patient groups with high and low predicted individual risk (P = 5.5 × 10). Low predicted individual mortality was found to be a favorable prognostic factor for overall survival in a univariate Cox proportional hazards model (hazards ratio, 1.038; 95% confidence interval, 1.015-1.062; P = 0.0059).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that baseline MRI in GBM patients contains prognostic information, which can be accessed by radiomic analysis using RSFs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28079702     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  35 in total

1.  Radiomics in peritumoral non-enhancing regions: fractional anisotropy and cerebral blood volume improve prediction of local progression and overall survival in patients with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Jung Youn Kim; Min Jae Yoon; Ji Eun Park; Eun Jung Choi; Jongho Lee; Ho Sung Kim
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  A mesoscopic simulator to uncover heterogeneity and evolutionary dynamics in tumors.

Authors:  Juan Jiménez-Sánchez; Álvaro Martínez-Rubio; Anton Popov; Julián Pérez-Beteta; Youness Azimzade; David Molina-García; Juan Belmonte-Beitia; Gabriel F Calvo; Víctor M Pérez-García
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Morphologic Features on MR Imaging Classify Multifocal Glioblastomas in Different Prognostic Groups.

Authors:  J Pérez-Beteta; D Molina-García; M Villena; M J Rodríguez; C Velásquez; J Martino; B Meléndez-Asensio; Á Rodríguez de Lope; R Morcillo; J M Sepúlveda; A Hernández-Laín; A Ramos; J A Barcia; P C Lara; D Albillo; A Revert; E Arana; V M Pérez-García
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Correlation of texture analysis of paraspinal musculature on MRI with different clinical endpoints: Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS).

Authors:  Manoj Mannil; Jakob M Burgstaller; Ulrike Held; Mazda Farshad; Roman Guggenberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Texture analysis of paraspinal musculature in MRI of the lumbar spine: analysis of the lumbar stenosis outcome study (LSOS) data.

Authors:  Manoj Mannil; Jakob M Burgstaller; Arjun Thanabalasingam; Sebastian Winklhofer; Michael Betz; Ulrike Held; Roman Guggenberger
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Radiomics as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker: Practical Considerations and the Current Standpoint in Neuro-oncologic Studies.

Authors:  Ji Eun Park; Ho Sung Kim
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-02-01

7.  Validation and optimization of a web-based nomogram for predicting survival of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Authors:  Nalee Kim; Jee Suk Chang; Chan Woo Wee; In Ah Kim; Jong Hee Chang; Hye Sun Lee; Se Hoon Kim; Seok-Gu Kang; Eui Hyun Kim; Hong In Yoon; Jun Won Kim; Chang-Ki Hong; Jaeho Cho; Eunji Kim; Tae Min Kim; Yu Jung Kim; Chul-Kee Park; Jin Wook Kim; Chae-Yong Kim; Seung Hong Choi; Jae Hyoung Kim; Sung-Hye Park; Gheeyoung Choe; Soon-Tae Lee; Il Han Kim; Chang-Ok Suh
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Prediction of survival with multi-scale radiomic analysis in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Ahmad Chaddad; Siham Sabri; Tamim Niazi; Bassam Abdulkarim
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  A three-dimensional computational analysis of magnetic resonance images characterizes the biological aggressiveness in malignant brain tumours.

Authors:  J Pérez-Beteta; A Martínez-González; V M Pérez-García
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 10.  Digital Analysis in Breast Imaging.

Authors:  Giovanna Negrão de Figueiredo; Michael Ingrisch; Eva Maria Fallenberg
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.