Literature DB >> 28079533

National and Regional Differences in 32,248 Postmastectomy Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using the Updated National Inpatient Survey.

Parisa Kamali1, Marek A Paul, Ahmed M S Ibrahim, Pieter G L Koolen, Winona Wu, Marc L Schermerhorn, Bernard T Lee, Samuel J Lin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of breast cancer (BC) cases has increased significantly. The number of breast reconstruction (BR) procedures performed has mirrored this trend. Although implant-only procedures remain the most commonly used type of immediate BR, autologous techniques involving donor sites account for approximately 20%. The aim of this study was to assess national and regional trends in different types of autologous BR.
METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2008 to 2012), data on BC and mastectomy rates, type of autologous BR, and sociodemographics were obtained and analyzed. Furthermore, national and regional trends over time for autologous BR were plotted and analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 427,272 patients diagnosed with BC or at increased risk of BC were included in the study. A total of 343,163 (80.3%) patients underwent mastectomy and, within this group, 148,700 (43.3%) patients underwent immediate BR. Of these, 32,249 (21.7%) patients underwent an autologous BR (not solely implant based) and 118,258 (78.3%) implant-based BR. Most autologous BRs were performed in the Southern region (37.4%). When stratified into flap types, most pedicled transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM), free TRAM, and other flaps were performed in the Northeast region, whereas most deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) and latissimus dorsi (LD) flaps were performed in the Southern region. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a significant increasing trend for both LD and DIEP flaps, both nationally (P < 0.001) and regionally (P < 0.001). Pedicled TRAM and free TRAM reconstructions decreased significantly both on national and regional level.
CONCLUSIONS: Autologous BR demonstrated a significant positive trend over time in the Southern region (P < 0.001). The DIEP and LD flaps increased significantly over time, both nationally and regionally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28079533     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  7 in total

1.  Elective Revisions after Breast Reconstruction: Results from the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium.

Authors:  Jonas A Nelson; Sophocles H Voineskos; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Edwin G Wilkins; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Patterns and Correlates of Knowledge, Communication, and Receipt of Breast Reconstruction in a Modern Population-Based Cohort of Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Adeyiza O Momoh; Kent A Griffith; Sarah T Hawley; Monica Morrow; Kevin C Ward; Ann S Hamilton; Dean Shumway; Steven J Katz; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  [Multivariable analysis for flap-related complications in autologous breast reconstruction and economic analysis of intraoperative indocyanine green angiography].

Authors:  Zeyang Liu; Zan Li; Xiaowei Peng; Bo Zhou; Yuanyuan Tang; Peng Wu; Dajiang Song; Chunliu Lü; Wen Peng; Hui Li; Yan Ou; Anji Xu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-01-15

4.  The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 30-Day Challenge: Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Reporting Reliability.

Authors:  Austin D Chen; Parisa Kamali; Anmol S Chattha; Alexandra Bucknor; Justin B Cohen; Patrick P Bletsis; Renata Flecha-Hirsch; Adam M Tobias; Bernard T Lee; Samuel J Lin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-03-06

5.  Influence of socioeconomic status on immediate breast reconstruction rate, patient information and involvement in surgical decision-making.

Authors:  A Frisell; J Lagergren; M Halle; J de Boniface
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-01-31

6.  The Association of Overall Annual Hospital Volume and Perioperative Outcomes following Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ronnie L Shammas; Yi Ren; Samantha M Thomas; Brett T Phillips; Scott T Hollenbeck; Rachel A Greenup
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 5.169

7.  Breast-Contour-Preserving Procedure as a Multidisciplinary Parameter of Esthetic Outcome in Breast Cancer Treatment in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Annnelotte van Bommel; Pauline Spronk; Marc Mureau; Sabine Siesling; Carolien Smorenburg; Rob Tollenaar; Marie-Jeanne Vrancken Peeters; Thijs van Dalen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 5.344

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.