Literature DB >> 28079369

Muropeptide Binding and the X-ray Structure of the Effector Domain of the Transcriptional Regulator AmpR of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

David A Dik1, Teresa Domínguez-Gil2, Mijoon Lee1, Dusan Hesek1, Byungjin Byun1, Jennifer Fishovitz1, Bill Boggess1, Lance M Hellman1, Jed F Fisher1, Juan A Hermoso2, Shahriar Mobashery1.   

Abstract

A complex link exists between cell-wall recycling/repair and the manifestation of resistance to β-lactam antibiotics in many Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This process is mediated by specific cell-wall-derived muropeptide products. These muropeptides are internalized into the cytoplasm and bind to the transcriptional regulator AmpR, which controls the cytoplasmic events that lead to expression of β-lactamase, an antibiotic-resistance determinant. The effector-binding domain (EBD) of AmpR was purified to homogeneity. We document that the EBD exists exclusively as a dimer, even at a concentration as low as 1 μM. The EBD binds to the suppressor ligand UDP-N-acetyl-β-d-muramyl-l-Ala-γ-d-Glu-meso-DAP-d-Ala-d-Ala and binds to two activator muropeptides, N-acetyl-β-d-glucosamine-(1→4)-1,6-anhydro-N-acetyl-β-d-muramyl-l-Ala-γ-d-Glu-meso-DAP-d-Ala-d-Ala and 1,6-anhydro-N-acetyl-β-d-muramyl-l-Ala-γ-d-Glu-meso-DAP-d-Ala-d-Ala, as assessed by non-denaturing mass spectrometry. The EBD does not bind to 1,6-anhydro-N-acetyl-β-d-muramyl-l-Ala-γ-d-Glu-meso-DAP. This binding selectivity revises the dogma in the field. The crystal structure of the EBD dimer was solved to 2.2 Å resolution. The EBD crystallizes in a "closed" conformation, in contrast to the "open" structure required to bind the muropeptides. Structural issues of this ligand recognition are addressed by molecular dynamics simulations, which reveal significant differences among the complexes with the effector molecules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28079369      PMCID: PMC5436579          DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b12819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  26 in total

Review 1.  The sentinel role of peptidoglycan recycling in the β-lactam resistance of the Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Jed F Fisher; Shahriar Mobashery
Journal:  Bioorg Chem       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 5.275

2.  The signal molecule for beta-lactamase induction in Enterobacter cloacae is the anhydromuramyl-pentapeptide.

Authors:  H Dietz; D Pfeifle; B Wiedemann
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Bacterial cell-wall recycling.

Authors:  Jarrod W Johnson; Jed F Fisher; Shahriar Mobashery
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Investigation of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa ampR gene and its role at the chromosomal ampC beta-lactamase promoter.

Authors:  J Lodge; S Busby; L Piddock
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1993-08-01       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  AmpG, a signal transducer in chromosomal beta-lactamase induction.

Authors:  S Lindquist; K Weston-Hafer; H Schmidt; C Pul; G Korfmann; J Erickson; C Sanders; H H Martin; S Normark
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.501

6.  Bacterial AmpD at the crossroads of peptidoglycan recycling and manifestation of antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Mijoon Lee; Weilie Zhang; Dusan Hesek; Bruce C Noll; Bill Boggess; Shahriar Mobashery
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Reaction products and the X-ray structure of AmpDh2, a virulence determinant of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Siseth Martínez-Caballero; Mijoon Lee; Cecilia Artola-Recolons; César Carrasco-López; Dusan Hesek; Edward Spink; Elena Lastochkin; Weilie Zhang; Lance M Hellman; Bill Boggess; Shahriar Mobashery; Juan A Hermoso
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Regulatory components in Citrobacter freundii ampC beta-lactamase induction.

Authors:  F Lindberg; L Westman; S Normark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Total synthesis of N-acetylglucosamine-1,6-anhydro-N-acetylmuramylpentapeptide and evaluation of its turnover by AmpD from Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Dusan Hesek; Mijoon Lee; Weilie Zhang; Bruce C Noll; Shahriar Mobashery
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Bacterial cell wall recycling provides cytosolic muropeptides as effectors for beta-lactamase induction.

Authors:  C Jacobs; L J Huang; E Bartowsky; S Normark; J T Park
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1994-10-03       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Cell-Wall Recycling of the Gram-Negative Bacteria and the Nexus to Antibiotic Resistance.

Authors:  David A Dik; Jed F Fisher; Shahriar Mobashery
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 2.  Constructing and deconstructing the bacterial cell wall.

Authors:  Jed F Fisher; Shahriar Mobashery
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Fluorescence Assessment of the AmpR-Signaling Network of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Exposure to β-Lactam Antibiotics.

Authors:  David A Dik; Choon Kim; Chinedu S Madukoma; Jed F Fisher; Joshua D Shrout; Shahriar Mobashery
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 5.100

4.  Catalytic Cycle of the N-Acetylglucosaminidase NagZ from Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Iván Acebrón; Kiran V Mahasenan; Stefania De Benedetti; Mijoon Lee; Cecilia Artola-Recolons; Dusan Hesek; Huan Wang; Juan A Hermoso; Shahriar Mobashery
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 5.  Lytic transglycosylases: concinnity in concision of the bacterial cell wall.

Authors:  David A Dik; Daniel R Marous; Jed F Fisher; Shahriar Mobashery
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 8.250

6.  Induction of AmpC-Mediated β-Lactam Resistance Requires a Single Lytic Transglycosylase in Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

Authors:  Wanda M Figueroa-Cuilan; Matthew Howell; Christopher Richards; Amelia Randich; Akhilesh K Yadav; Felipe Cava; Pamela J B Brown
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 5.005

Review 7.  Class C β-Lactamases: Molecular Characteristics.

Authors:  Alain Philippon; Guillaume Arlet; Roger Labia; Bogdan I Iorga
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 50.129

8.  Mechanisms of Resistance to Ceftolozane/Tazobactam in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Results of the GERPA Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Damien Fournier; Romain Carrière; Maxime Bour; Emilie Grisot; Pauline Triponney; Cédric Muller; Jérôme Lemoine; Katy Jeannot; Patrick Plésiat
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Exolytic and endolytic turnover of peptidoglycan by lytic transglycosylase Slt of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Mijoon Lee; María T Batuecas; Shusuke Tomoshige; Teresa Domínguez-Gil; Kiran V Mahasenan; David A Dik; Dusan Hesek; Claudia Millán; Isabel Usón; Elena Lastochkin; Juan A Hermoso; Shahriar Mobashery
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a Model To Study Chemosensory Pathway Signaling.

Authors:  Miguel A Matilla; David Martín-Mora; Jose A Gavira; Tino Krell
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 11.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.