Literature DB >> 28078978

Preschoolers Flexibly Adapt to Linguistic Input in a Noisy Channel.

Daniel Yurovsky1, Sarah Case2, Michael C Frank2.   

Abstract

Because linguistic communication is inherently noisy and uncertain, adult language comprehenders integrate bottom-up cues from speech perception with top-down expectations about what speakers are likely to say. Further, in line with the predictions of ideal-observer models, past results have shown that adult comprehenders flexibly adapt how much they rely on these two kinds of cues in proportion to their changing reliability. Do children also show evidence of flexible, expectation-based language comprehension? We presented preschoolers with ambiguous utterances that could be interpreted in two different ways, depending on whether the children privileged perceptual input or top-down expectations. Across three experiments, we manipulated the reliability of both their perceptual input and their expectations about the speaker's intended meaning. As predicted by noisy-channel models of speech processing, results showed that 4- and 5-year-old-but perhaps not younger-children flexibly adjusted their interpretations as cues changed in reliability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive development; language processing; noisy channel; open data; open materials

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28078978      PMCID: PMC5240794          DOI: 10.1177/0956797616668557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  24 in total

1.  Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth.

Authors:  R A Jacobs
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Lexical and referential cues to sentence interpretation: an investigation of children's interpretations of ambiguous sentences.

Authors:  Evan Kidd; Edith L Bavin
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2005-11

3.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  Roger Levy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-07-30

Review 4.  Robust speech perception: recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel.

Authors:  Dave F Kleinschmidt; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  That's not what you said earlier: preschoolers expect partners to be referentially consistent.

Authors:  Susan A Graham; Julie Sedivy; Melanie Khu
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2013-02-11

6.  Redundancy and reduction: speakers manage syntactic information density.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children.

Authors:  J C Trueswell; I Sekerina; N M Hill; M L Logrip
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-12-07

8.  Fusion of visual cues is not mandatory in children.

Authors:  Marko Nardini; Rachael Bedford; Denis Mareschal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Preschoolers monitor the relative accuracy of informants.

Authors:  Elisabeth S Pasquini; Kathleen H Corriveau; Melissa Koenig; Paul L Harris
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2007-09

10.  Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation.

Authors:  Edward Gibson; Leon Bergen; Steven T Piantadosi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  6 in total

1.  Look at that: Spatial deixis reveals experience-related differences in prediction.

Authors:  Tracy Reuter; Mia Sullivan; Casey Lew-Williams
Journal:  Lang Acquis       Date:  2021-07-30

Review 2.  Good-enough language production.

Authors:  Adele E Goldberg; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 24.482

3.  Learning Through Processing: Toward an Integrated Approach to Early Word Learning.

Authors:  Stephan C Meylan; Elika Bergelson
Journal:  Annu Rev Linguist       Date:  2021-10-05

4.  Adults and children predict in complex and variable referential contexts.

Authors:  Tracy Reuter; Kavindya Dalawella; Casey Lew-Williams
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  Children Treat Grammatical Errors Differently for Native and Non-Native Speakers.

Authors:  Alexandra Rett; Katherine S White
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-22

6.  Children flexibly seek visual information to support signed and spoken language comprehension.

Authors:  Kyle MacDonald; Virginia A Marchman; Anne Fernald; Michael C Frank
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2019-11-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.