Literature DB >> 28078464

Outcome of stent grafting for esophageal perforations: single-center experience.

Fausto Biancari1, Tuomas Tauriainen2, Tatu Ylikotila2, Misa Kokkonen3, Jukka Rintala4, Elisa Mäkäräinen-Uhlbäck5, Vesa Koivukangas2, Juha Saarnio2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies showed that stent grafting is a promising technique for treatment of esophageal perforation. However, the evidence of its benefits is still scarce.
METHODS: Forty-three consecutive patients underwent stent grafting for esophageal perforation at the Oulu University Hospital, Finland. The main endpoints of this study were early and mid-term mortality. Secondary outcome endpoints were the need of esophagectomy and additional surgical procedures on the esophagus and extraesophageal structures.
RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 64.6 ± 13.4 years. The mean delay to primary treatment was 23 ± 27 h. The most frequent cause of perforation was Boerhaave's syndrome (46.5%). The thoraco-abdominal segment of the esophagus was affected in 58.1% of cases. Minor primary procedures were performed in 25 patients (58.1%) and repeat surgical procedures in 23 patients (53.5%). Forty-nine repeat stent graftings were performed in 22 patients (50%). Two patients (4.7%) underwent esophagectomy, one for unrelenting preprocedural stricture of the esophagus and another for persistent leakage of a perforated esophageal carcinoma. The mean length of stay in the intensive care unit was 6.0 ± 7.5 days and the in-hospital stay was 24.3 ± 19.6 days. In-hospital mortality was 4.6%. Three-year survival was 67.2%.
CONCLUSIONS: Stent grafting seems to be an effective less invasive technique for the treatment of esophageal perforation. Repeat stent grafting and procedures on the pleural spaces are often needed to control the site of perforation and for debridement of surrounding infected structures. Stent grafting allows the preservation of the esophagus in most of patients. The mid-term survival of these patients is suboptimal and requires further investigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophagectomy; Esophagus; Oesophagus; Perforation; Stent graft; Stent grafting

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28078464     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5408-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  32 in total

1.  The surgical management of spontaneous esophageal perforation (Boerhaave's syndrome) ‒ 20 years of experience.

Authors:  Edgardo Pezzetta; Takashi Kokudo; Emilie Uldry; Takamune Yamaguchi; Hiroki Kudo; Hans-Beat Ris; Michel Christodoulou; Henri Vuilleumier; Nermin Halkic
Journal:  Biosci Trends       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.400

2.  Management of thoracic esophageal perforation.

Authors:  Yidan Lin; Guangliang Jiang; Lunxu Liu; Jack Xiwen Jiang; Longqi Chen; Yongfan Zhao; Junjie Yang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  On the need of standards for reporting on esophageal perforation.

Authors:  F Biancari
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2012 Aug-Sep

4.  An Assessment of the Optimal Time for Removal of Esophageal Stents Used in the Treatment of an Esophageal Anastomotic Leak or Perforation.

Authors:  Richard K Freeman; Anthony J Ascioti; Megan Dake; Raja S Mahidhara
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Esophageal perforation management using a multidisciplinary minimally invasive treatment algorithm.

Authors:  Kfir Ben-David; Kevin Behrns; Steven Hochwald; Georgios Rossidis; Angel Caban; Cristina Crippen; Thomas Caranasos; Steven Hughes; Peter Draganov; Christopher Forsmark; Shailendra Chauhan; Mihir S Wagh; George Sarosi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Treatment of early and delayed esophageal perforation.

Authors:  F Kroepil; M Schauer; A M Raffel; P Kröpil; C F Eisenberger; W T Knoefel
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 0.656

7.  Timing of esophageal stent placement and outcomes in patients with esophageal perforation: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Udayakumar Navaneethan; Vennisvasanth Lourdusamy; Sudhir Duvuru; Dennisdhilak Lourdusamy; Dhruv Mehta; Siva Raja; Sudhish Murthy; Madhusudhan R Sanaka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Esophagectomy and Gastric Pull-through Procedures: Surgical Techniques, Imaging Features, and Potential Complications.

Authors:  Jennifer C Flanagan; Richard Batz; Sachin S Saboo; Shaun M Nordeck; Suhny Abbara; Kemp Kernstine; Vasantha Vasan
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Management of delayed intrathoracic esophageal perforation with modified intraluminal esophageal stent.

Authors:  J-H Zhou; T-Q Gong; Y-G Jiang; R-W Wang; Y-P Zhao; Q-Y Tan; Z Ma; Y-D Lin; B Deng
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 3.429

10.  Evaluation of urgent esophagectomy in esophageal perforation.

Authors:  José Luis Braga de Aquino; José Gonzaga Teixeira de Camargo; Gustavo Nardini Cecchino; Douglas Alexandre Rizzanti Pereira; Caroline Agnelli Bento; Vânia Aparecida Leandro-Merhi
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec
View more
  3 in total

1.  Endoscopic clipping of spontaneous esophageal rupture: Case reports of three patients.

Authors:  Koji Otsuka; Masahiko Murakami; Tomotake Ariyoshi; Takeshi Yamashita; Satoru Goto; Makoto Watanabe; Takeshi Aoki
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-07-08

2.  Conservative management of esophageal perforation caused by misplacement of endotracheal tube.

Authors:  Reza Rezaei; Yousef Yousefi
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2019-06-28

3.  Current treatment and outcome of esophageal perforation: A single-center experience and a pooled analysis.

Authors:  Yufeng Deng; Luqi Hou; Dianyue Qin; Ting Huang; Tianzhu Yuan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.