Literature DB >> 19191858

Management of delayed intrathoracic esophageal perforation with modified intraluminal esophageal stent.

J-H Zhou1, T-Q Gong, Y-G Jiang, R-W Wang, Y-P Zhao, Q-Y Tan, Z Ma, Y-D Lin, B Deng.   

Abstract

In this article, we reviewed our experience of treatment of the delayed intrathoracic nonmalignant esophageal perforation employing modified intraluminal esophageal stent. Between February 1990 and August 2006, eight patients were included in this study. Five patients experienced sepsis. The interval time between perforation and stent placement ranged from 36 h to 27 days (average, 8.6 days). Esophageal stenting and throracotomy for foreign body removal were performed in four patients. The remaining four patients underwent stent placement and thoracostomy. Nutrition was initiated through gastrostomy after 7 to 10 days after the stenting. The stent was removed after the patients resumed oral intake of food and the esophagogram showed that perforation was closed. There was no death in this group. Signs of sepsis remitted 1 week after stent placement. Complications included stress ulcer, stimulative cough, and pneumonia each. Stent removal ranged 32 to 120 days (average 66.7) after its placement. The stent was kept in place for 4 months to prevent formation of esophageal stricture in one patient with caustic esophageal burns. The follow-up was completed in all the patients. The mean follow-up period was 59 months (range 12-180). One patient with caustic esophageal burn underwent cicatricial esophagectomy and gastric transposition 3 years later due to the esophageal stricture. Barium swallow demonstrated that there was a diverticulum-like outpouching in one patient and slight esophageal stricture at T2 and T3 level in another. One patient developed reflux esophagitis 5 years after stent removal. All the patients finally had a normal intake of food. Modified esophageal stenting is an effective method to manage the delayed intrathoracic esophageal perforation. Prevention of stent migration and its convenient adjustment might be the major advantages of this method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19191858     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2008.00927.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  8 in total

1.  Feasibility and safety of endoscopic transesophageal access and closure using a Maryland dissector and a self-expanding metal stent.

Authors:  Daniel von Renteln; Melina C Vassiliou; Karel Caca; Arthur Schmidt; Richard I Rothstein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Delayed presentation of intrathoracic esophageal perforation after pneumatic dilation for achalasia.

Authors:  Ming-Tzung Lin; Wei-Chen Tai; King-Wah Chiu; Yeh-Pin Chou; Ming-Chao Tsai; Tsung-Hui Hu; Chuan-Mo Lee; Chi-Sin Changchien; Seng-Kee Chuah
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Cervical esophageal perforation: a 10-year clinical experience in north of iran.

Authors:  Manouchehr Aghajanzadeh; Nastaran Farahmand Porkar; Hannan Ebrahimi
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-06-17

4.  Outcome of stent grafting for esophageal perforations: single-center experience.

Authors:  Fausto Biancari; Tuomas Tauriainen; Tatu Ylikotila; Misa Kokkonen; Jukka Rintala; Elisa Mäkäräinen-Uhlbäck; Vesa Koivukangas; Juha Saarnio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Esophageal perforation: diagnostic work-up and clinical decision-making in the first 24 hours.

Authors:  Jon Arne Søreide; Asgaut Viste
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 6.  Critical Appraisal of the Impact of Oesophageal Stents in the Management of Oesophageal Anastomotic Leaks and Benign Oesophageal Perforations: An Updated Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sivesh K Kamarajah; James Bundred; Gary Spence; Andrew Kennedy; Bobby V M Dasari; Ewen A Griffiths
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS), partially covered SEMS and self-expandable plastic stents for the treatment of benign esophageal ruptures and anastomotic leaks.

Authors:  Petra G A van Boeckel; Kulwinder S Dua; Bas L A M Weusten; Ruben J H Schmits; Naveen Surapaneni; Robin Timmer; Frank P Vleggaar; Peter D Siersema
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 8.  Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal leaks and fistulae: What option do we have?

Authors:  Fabrizio Cereatti; Roberto Grassia; Andrea Drago; Clara Benedetta Conti; Gianfranco Donatelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.