Literature DB >> 28078081

Occurrence of Pasteurella multocida among pigs with respiratory disease in China between 2011 and 2015.

Huisheng Liu1, Zhanqin Zhao1, Xiaojian Xi1, Qiao Xue1, Ta Long1, Yun Xue2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prior to the 1990s, P. multocida capsular serogroup A was the most prevalent in China, followed by serogroups B and D. Thirty years later, serogroup D became the most prevalent, followed by serogroups A and B. However, the P. multocida capsular serogroups currently circulating in China remain unclear. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to provide an update on P. multocida serogroups isolated from diagnostic samples collected from clinically diseased pigs in Central and Eastern China from 2011 to 2015.
RESULTS: Between February 2011 and October 2015, 296 isolates of Pasteurella multocida were collected from 3212 pigs with clinical respiratory disease in 12 provinces of China (isolation rate of 9.2%). Of the 296 collected isolates, 146 (49.3%) were P. multocida capsular type A, 141 (47.6%) were capsular type D, and one was capsular type B. Streptococcus suis (94/193; 48.7%), Haemophilus parasuis (76/193; 39.3%), Escherichia coli (53/193; 27.5%), and Bordetella bronchiseptica (26/193; 13.5%) were frequently isolated together with P. multocida. A total of 14 toxigenic P. multocida strains co-isolated with other pathogens from 32 cases of atrophic rhinitis were classified into serogroup D. The virulence of P. multocida capsular type A isolates was higher than that of capsular type D isolates based on LD50 studies in mice.
CONCLUSIONS: Over the past 5 years, P. multocida capsular type A was the most frequently isolated from diagnostic submissions in Central and Eastern China, followed by serogroups D and B.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bordetella bronchiseptica; Co-infection; Pasteurella multocida; Respiratory pathogen; Swine

Year:  2017        PMID: 28078081      PMCID: PMC5223352          DOI: 10.1186/s13620-016-0080-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir Vet J        ISSN: 0368-0762            Impact factor:   2.146


Background

Pasteurella multocida (P. multocida), a Gram-negative, non-motile, facultative coccobacillus, belonging to the Pasteurellaceae family [1], is an opportunistic pathogen and common inhabitant of the upper respiratory tract of many animal species, and a causative agent of numerous economically important diseases worldwide, including atrophic rhinitis (AR) in swine, fowl cholera in birds, pneumonia and shipping fever in cattle, snuffles in rabbits [2-4], and occasional zoonotic infections in humans [5]. P. multocida strains are classified into five capsular serogroups (A, B, D, E, and F) and 16 somatic serotypes (1 to 16) based on lipopolysaccharide antigens [6-8]. To date, capsular serogroups A, B, and D have been identified in pigs [8, 9]. Of these, serogroups A and D are causative agents of AR, which result in significant economic losses to the swine industry worldwide [9-12]. P. multocida possesses various virulence factors, including fimbriae, adhesins, and toxins, especially dermonecrotic toxin. Of these virulence factors, toxins produced by serogroups A and D play important roles in the pathogenicity of P. multocida. Only toxigenic strains can cause AR, which is characterized by loss of the nasal turbinate bone [13, 14]. Therefore, data on P. multocida toxins can provide better understanding of pasteurellosis in pigs. Diseases caused by different serogroups and their prevalence may change over time within particular regions. Prior to the 1990s, capsular serogroups A and B were the most prevalent in diseased pigs in China, followed by serogroup D [15]. Thirty years later, serogroups A and D became the most prevalent, followed by serogroup B [8]. However, these data are from several years ago and do not represent P. multocida capsular serogroups circulating in China in recent years, as the identification of P. multocida capsular serogroups currently circulating in China remain unclear. Hence, to provide an update on P. multocida capsular serogroups currently circulating in China, we investigated a total of 296 P. multocida strains isolated from pigs submitted to our diagnostic laboratory from 12 provinces of China from 2011 to 2015 to estimate the occurrence of P. multocida alone and in combination with other bacterial pathogens in pigs with respiratory disease. The findings of this study provide useful data to inform control strategies for respiratory disease and are relevant to future work on the development of effective vaccines.

Methods

Samples collection

Between February 2011 and October 2015, a total of 3212 lung samples were collected from pigs submitted to our diagnostic laboratory from 12 different provinces in Central and Eastern China for further identification of P. multocida. The data obtained from clinically affected pigs in Central and Eastern China may reflect, at least in part, the true occurrence of P. multocida in diagnostic submissions from the whole of China, since most of the pigs were raised in Central and Eastern China. All lung samples exhibited different degrees of pneumonic lesions and were collected by a single skilled veterinarian. A total of 713 commercial pig farms were included, which had a wide variety of management types and herd size with small-, medium- and large-scale pig farms as well as various types of backyard farms. Only one pig farm was selected per region. If there was more than one pig farm in the same region, the larger pig farm was selected. During the study period, 13 to 107 pig cases were collected per month. One to 10 lung samples were randomly collected per herd. If more than one P. multocida isolate was found in the same herd, one of the isolates belonging the same serogroup was included in the analysis. All samples were processed for bacterial culture within 10 h of collection.

Bacterial isolation and identification

Each sample was plated on tryptic soy agar supplemented with 10 μg/mL of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide and 5% fetal calf serum. All plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24–48 h. Afterward, the isolates were purified and cultured by standard methods for rapid primary identification of P. multocida, Streptococcus suis (S. suis), Haemophilus parasuis (HPS), Escherichia coli (E. coli), Bordetella bronchiseptica (Bb), and Salmonella spp., respectively, by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the respective specific primers listed in Table 1, as described previously [16-21]. After this stage, the strains were further identified by Gram-staining characteristics and oxidase (Gram-negative bacilli) or catalase tests [22]. All primers were synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Standard P. multocida, E. coli, and Salmonella strains, purchased from China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control (Beijing, China), and Bb and HPS strains, stored at our laboratory [23], were used as positive controls. Sterile water was used as a negative control. All isolates were freeze-dried and stored at –80 °C.
Table 1

Primers used for the identification of bacterial isolates, capsule typing, and the toxA gene

StrainsTarget genesNameSequences (5’ → 3’)Product (bp)References
P. multocida kmt1Pm-1ATCCGCTATTTACCCAGTGG457[17]
Pm-2GCTGTAAACGAACTCGCCAC
P. multocida (serotype A)hyaD-hyaCAPm-1GATGCCAAAATCGCAGTCAG1048[7]
APm-2TGTTGCCATCATTGTCAGTG
P. multocida (serotype B)dcbDBPm-1CATTTATCCAAGCTCCACC758[7]
BPm-2GCCCGAGAGTTTCAATCC
P. multocida (serotype D)dcbFDPm-1TTACAAAAGAAAGACTAGGAGCCC647[7]
DPm-2CATCTACCCACTCAACCATATCAG
P. multocida (serotype E) ecbJ EPm-1TCCGCAGAAAATTATTGACTC512[7]
EPm-2GCTTGCTGCTTGATTTTGTC
P. multocida (serotype F) fcbD FPm-1AATCGGAGAACGCAGAAATCAG852[7]
FPm-2TTCCGCCGTCAATTACTCTG
P. multocida (toxA gene)toxAtoxA-1CTTAGATGAGCGACAAGG864[24]
toxA-2GAATGCCACACCTCTATAG
S. suis gdhSs-1GCAGCGTATTCTGTCAAACG689[20]
Ss-2CCATGGACAGATAAAGATGG
HPS 16S rRNAHPS-1TATCGRGAGATGAAAGAC1086/1090[21]
HPS-1’GTAATGTCTAAGGACTAG
HPS-2CCTCGCGGCTTCGTC
E. coli uidAEc-1ATGAAAGCTGGCTACAGGAAGGCC264[16]
Ec-2GGTTTATGCAGCAACGAGACGTCA
Bb flaBBb-1TGGCGCCTGCCCTATC237[19]
Bb-2AGGCTCCCAAGAGAGAAA
Salmonella invASal-1CAGGATACCTATAGTGCTGC580[18]
Sal-2CGCACCGTCAAAGGAACCGT

S. suis, HPS, E. coli, and Bb represent Streptococcus suis, Haemophilus parasuis, Escherichia coli and Bordetella bronchiseptica, respectively

Primers used for the identification of bacterial isolates, capsule typing, and the toxA gene S. suis, HPS, E. coli, and Bb represent Streptococcus suis, Haemophilus parasuis, Escherichia coli and Bordetella bronchiseptica, respectively

Capsule typing

The capsular types of P. multocida were confirmed by multiplex capsule PCR with capsule-specific primer pairs (Table 1), as described by Townsend et al. [7].

Detection of toxA gene

The toxA gene of P. multocida was confirmed by PCR with a specific primer pair (Table 1), as described by Zhao et al. [24].

Detection of virulence

Twenty-five BALB/c mice at 6 weeks of age (Vital River Laboratories Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) were randomly assigned to five groups (A1–A5) of five animals each, as previously described [25]. The mice were housed in a standard animal facility with ad libitum access to normal rodent diet and water. P. multocida was cultured on trypticase soy broth supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum and incubated on a shaking table at 200 rpm and temperature of 37 °C for 12–16 h. The number of P. multocida were enumerated by plate counts. Cultures were serially diluted 5-fold in sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Then, the original cultures (undiluted), cultures diluted 5-fold, cultures diluted 25-fold, and cultures diluted 125-fold were generated. The mice in groups A1–A4 were inoculated intraperitoneally with 0.2 ml per mouse of the original cultures, and cultures diluted 5, 25, and 125-fold, respectively, and the mice in group A5 were injected with 0.2 ml of sterile PBS, as a control group. The 50% lethal dose (LD50) was calculated on 15 days post-infection, as previously described [25].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 17.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Prevalence of P. multocida in porcine clinical samples

Over the 5-year period of this study, P. multocida was isolated from 296/3212 (9.2%) lung samples collected from pigs with clinical respiratory disease. The annual isolation rates ranged from 7.5% to 10.7% with the highest isolation rate recorded in 2012 and the lowest in 2011 (Table 2). Differences in the isolation rates were not significant (p > 0.05) between February 2011 and October 2015. There was no association between collection month and isolation rate (p > 0.05). The monthly isolation rates ranged from 7.4% to 11.8% with the highest recorded in month 12, followed by months 6, 11, and 9 (Fig. 1). In addition, strains of P. multocida were isolated throughout the year without seasonal variation (p > 0.05; spring, months 3–5; summer, months 6–8; autumn, months 9–11; winter, months 12–2; Fig. 1).
Table 2

Numbers of isolates of P. multocida and other pathogens detected in 3212 lung samples from pigs collected between February 2011 and October 2015

YearNo. of sampleNo. of P. multocida Isolation rates(%)a Pathogens co-infected with P. multocida
S.suis HPS E. coli Bb Salmonella Others
2011616467.515138322
20125706110.7201711424
2013630579.0191511613
2014754729.6221712736
2015642609.3181411624
Total32122969.2947653261019
(48.7%)(39.3%)(27.5%)(13.5%)(5.1%)(9.8%)

aThere were no significant differences in the annual isolates rates of P. multocida between 2011 and 2015 (p > 0.05). Statistical analysis was performed using the χ 2 test. S. suis, HPS, E. coli, and Bb represent Streptococcus suis, Haemophilus parasuis, Escherichia coli and Bordetella bronchiseptica, respectively

Fig. 1

Distribution of P. multocida isolates by the sampling month between February 2011 and October 2015. The isolation rates were 19/222, 20/253, 22/296, 25/297, 21/233, 38/332, 28/303, 24/280, 21/217, 21/260, 29/281, and 28/238 for months 1–12, respectively. The isolation rates given are the average isolation rates per month over the 5-years study period. The highest isolation rates were recorded in month 12, followed by months 6, 11, and 9. However, as a whole, differences in the isolation rates were not significant (p > 0.05). Statistical analysis was performed using the χ 2 test

Numbers of isolates of P. multocida and other pathogens detected in 3212 lung samples from pigs collected between February 2011 and October 2015 aThere were no significant differences in the annual isolates rates of P. multocida between 2011 and 2015 (p > 0.05). Statistical analysis was performed using the χ 2 test. S. suis, HPS, E. coli, and Bb represent Streptococcus suis, Haemophilus parasuis, Escherichia coli and Bordetella bronchiseptica, respectively Distribution of P. multocida isolates by the sampling month between February 2011 and October 2015. The isolation rates were 19/222, 20/253, 22/296, 25/297, 21/233, 38/332, 28/303, 24/280, 21/217, 21/260, 29/281, and 28/238 for months 1–12, respectively. The isolation rates given are the average isolation rates per month over the 5-years study period. The highest isolation rates were recorded in month 12, followed by months 6, 11, and 9. However, as a whole, differences in the isolation rates were not significant (p > 0.05). Statistical analysis was performed using the χ 2 test P. multocida strains of capsular type A were isolated from 146 lung samples (49.3%), capsular type D strains were isolated from 141 lung samples (47.6%), capsular type B strains were isolated from one lung sample, and eight isolates were untypeable. Capsular types E and F were not detected in this study.

Prevalence of P. multocida accompanied by other species

P. multocida was isolated together with other bacterial pathogens in 65.2% (193/296) of the lung samples (Table 2). S. suis (94; 48.7%), HPS (76; 39.3%), and E. coli (53; 27.5%) were most frequently isolated together with P. multocida, followed by Bb (26; 13.5%) and Salmonella spp. (10; 5.1%). S. suis was isolated from 25.3% (812/3212) of the lung samples, HPS was isolated from 16.6% (533/3212), E. coli was isolated from 12.9% (415/3212), Bb was isolated from 7.3% (236/3212), and Salmonella was isolated from 3.3% (107/3212). P. multocida was the fourth most frequently isolated bacteria after S. suis, HPS and E. coli.

Prevalence of toxigenic P. multocida accompanied by other species

Of the 296 P. multocida isolates, only 14 toxigenic strains of P. multocida were identified by PCR and all were classified as capsular type D. Over the 5-year period of this study, 32/3212 (1%) pigs with typical clinical signs of AR were identified. All toxigenic strains of P. multocida were isolated from pigs with clinical signs of AR. Ten of these toxigenic P. multocida strains were isolated with Bb, seven with HPS, three with S. suis, and one with E. coli. In addition, Bb was isolated from pigs with no infection of toxigenic P. multocida strains.

Virulence

Twenty strains of P. multocida of each capsular types A and D were randomly selected, respectively, to estimate the LD50 in mice. Twenty-five mice were used for each of these 40 isolates (1000 mice in total). The results showed that the virulence of only one isolate of P. multocida capsular type A was relatively weak with a LD50 of 2.1 × 105, and the virulence of PM-30 of P. multocida capsular type D strain was lowest with a LD50 of > 4.9 × 107. As a whole, the virulence of P. multocida capsular type A was higher than that of capsular type D (Table 3).
Table 3

Virulence of P. multocida capsular type A and D strains in mice

StrainCapsular typeOriginLD50 (CFU)StrainCapsular typeOriginLD50 (CFU)
PM-1AHenan<84PM-21DHenan1.3 × 106
PM-2AShanxi<23PM-22DHubei3.4 × 106
PM-3AHubei4.1 × 103 PM-23DHenan1.9 × 105
PM-4AHenan<16PM-24DSichuan2.1 × 105
PM-5AShanxi<38PM-25DHubei2.6 × 104
PM-6AAnhui<167PM-26DShanxi2.6 × 104
PM-7AHenan<68PM-27DHenan5.7 × 105
PM-8ASichuan<145PM-28DHenan2.2 × 106
PM-9AShanxi<17PM-29DHubei3.3 × 106
PM-10AAnhui104PM-30DHenan>4.9 × 107
PM-11AHenan7.2 × 104 PM-31DShandong3.3 × 106
PM-12AShanxi<69PM-32DHenan1.6 × 107
PM-13AHenan6.8 × 104 PM-33DSichuan5.5 × 105
PM-14AShanxi<103PM-34DHubei2.9 × 105
PM-15AHenan123PM-35DHenan1.2 × 107
PM-16AHubei<134PM-36DShanxi1.3 × 105
PM-17AShanxi<70PM-37DHenan1.6 × 105
PM-18AHenan<42PM-38DShandong5.3 × 105
PM-19AHenan2.0 × 104 PM-39DHenan4.4 × 104
PM-20AHubei<93PM-40DJiangsu5.4 × 105

PM represent Pasteurella multocida

Virulence of P. multocida capsular type A and D strains in mice PM represent Pasteurella multocida

Discussion

In China, as in other parts of the world, P. multocida is frequently associated with outbreaks of respiratory infections in pigs. In this study, the prevalence of P. multocida infection was 9.2% (296/3212), which was higher (p > 0.05, χ 2 test) than in previous reports (8.0%, 233/2912) from China [8]. Additionally, the χ 2 test results showed that the annual prevalence of P. multocida infection was relatively stable (p > 0.05) between 2011 and 2015, in accordance with the annual prevalence from 2003 to 2007, as reported by Tang et al. [8]. The results of this study showed that the prevalence of P. multocida infection did not significantly differ (p > 0.05) by season, in agreement with the report by Tang et al. [8]. In addition, there was no clear association of P. multocida infection with the sampling month, with the highest prevalence in month 12, followed by month 6. However, because only a few samples fron each month were assayed, the data in this study may not reflect the real differences between months. Hence, the difference in isolation rates between months should to be addressed in future studies. Our findings suggest that strains of P. multocida are widely prevalent on pig farms, and there were no differences in the prevalence (p > 0.05, χ 2 test) of P. multocida of capsular type A (49.3%) and D (47.6%), which was different from the results of previous report from China (39.5% vs. 54.9%, p < 0.05) [8] and different from the report by Rajkhowa et al. [26]. These results showed that the prevalence of P. multocida capsular type A strains exhibited a tendency to increase over the past 5 years in China. The reasons for this tendency were unclear and need to be addressed in future studies. The eight untypeable isolates, which were associated with pneumonic pasteurellosis, should be further investigated. In this study, S. suis, HPS, E. coli, and Bb were frequently isolated together with P. multocida. Similar results were reported by Tang et al. [8] and Zhao et al. [22]. Accumulating evidence suggests that mixed infection of two or more bacteria may have been common over the last decade in China. Therefore, the practical significance of this finding is that future work on control of disease caused by P. multocida in pigs may require investigation of multivalent vaccines based on these bacteria rather than a monovalent vaccine. In addition, our results showed high isolation rates of S. suis, HPS, E. coli, and Bb, in accordance with recent reports from China [8, 22] and some other countries [27-29]. AR is seldom reported in China, which is supported by our findings (32/3212) as well as the reports by Tang et al. [8] and Zhao et al. [22]. The findings of previous studies combined with those of the present study confirmed the presence of AR in Henan, Shandong, Fujian, Hainan, Anhui, and Hubei provinces to date. In this study, all 14 toxigenic P. multocida strains were type D, which was in accordance with the findings of previous reports [8, 9, 22, 30]. In addition, 14 toxigenic P. multocida strains were isolated together with one, two, or three other pathogens and Bb was most frequently isolated with toxigenic P. multocida. Previous reports have mainly focused on the detection of virulence genes of P. multocida isolates. This is the first large-scale study of the virulence of P. multocida isolates based on LD50 studies in mice. Our findings showed that the virulence of P. multocida capsular type A isolates was higher than that of capsular type D isolates. The high virulence and prevalence of isolates of P. multocida capsular type A is expected to increase economic losses to the swine industry in China.

Conclusions

Our results disclosed epidemiological information of P. multocida infection of pigs over the past 5 years in China. Data from a total of 296 P. multocida isolates revealed no significant difference in the prevalence of P. multocida capsular types A and D in diagnostic procine lung samples submitted from 12 provinces in Central and Eastern China, and S. suis, HPS, E. coli, and Bb are often isolated together with P. multocida. In addition, our results showed that the virulence of P. multocida capsular type A was greater than that of capsular type D. The findings of this study are expected to facilitate a better understanding of the current status of P. multocida infection among pigs in China.
  26 in total

1.  Field study of pneumonia in vaccinated cattle associated with incorrect vaccination and Pasteurella multocida infection.

Authors:  W M Crawshaw; G L Caldow
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Development of an improved species specific PCR test for detection of Haemophilus parasuis.

Authors:  Oystein Angen; Simone Oliveira; Peter Ahrens; Birgitta Svensmark; Thomas D Leser
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 3.293

3.  Detection of Pasteurella multocida isolates from local pigs of India by polymerase chain reaction and their antibiogram.

Authors:  Swaraj Rajkhowa; Ingudam Shakuntala; Seema Rani Pegu; Rajib Kumar Das; Anubrata Das
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  The occurrence of Bordetella bronchiseptica in pigs with clinical respiratory disease.

Authors:  Zhanqin Zhao; Chen Wang; Yun Xue; Xibiao Tang; Bin Wu; Xiangchao Cheng; Qigai He; Huanchun Chen
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 2.688

5.  Serological classification of Pasteurella multocida.

Authors:  G R Carter
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1987-10-17       Impact factor: 2.695

6.  A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay specific for Streptococcus suis based on the gene encoding the glutamate dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Ogi Okwumabua; Michael O'Connor; Eileen Shull
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  Genetic diversity and associated pathology of Pasteurella multocida isolated from porcine pneumonia.

Authors:  Susanne E Pors; Mette S Hansen; Henrik Christensen; Henrik E Jensen; Andreas Petersen; Magne Bisgaard
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Demonstration that Australian Pasteurella multocida isolates from sporadic outbreaks of porcine pneumonia are non-toxigenic (toxA-) and display heterogeneous DNA restriction endonuclease profiles compared with toxigenic isolates from herds with progressive atrophic rhinitis.

Authors:  S P Djordjevic; G J Eamens; H Ha; M J Walker; J C Chin
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 9.  Diagnostic and typing options for investigating diseases associated with Pasteurella multocida.

Authors:  Francis Dziva; Amandus P Muhairwa; Magne Bisgaard; Henrik Christensen
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Prevalence of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Actinobacillus suis, Haemophilus parasuis, Pasteurella multocida, and Streptococcus suis in representative Ontario swine herds.

Authors:  Janet I MacInnes; Marcelo Gottschalk; Abdul G Lone; Devon S Metcalf; Shivani Ojha; Thomas Rosendal; Sheila B Watson; Robert M Friendship
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.310

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Pasteurella multocida: Genotypes and Genomics.

Authors:  Zhong Peng; Xiangru Wang; Rui Zhou; Huanchun Chen; Brenda A Wilson; Bin Wu
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Prevalence of virulence factor, antibiotic resistance, and serotype genes of Pasteurella multocida strains isolated from pigs in Vietnam.

Authors:  Hung Vu-Khac; T T Hang Trinh; T T Giang Nguyen; X Truong Nguyen; Thi Thinh Nguyen
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2020-05-15

Review 3.  Review of the speculative role of co-infections in Streptococcus suis-associated diseases in pigs.

Authors:  Milan R Obradovic; Mariela Segura; Joaquim Segalés; Marcelo Gottschalk
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.683

4.  Interaction study of Pasteurella multocida with culturable aerobic bacteria isolated from porcine respiratory tracts using coculture in conditioned media.

Authors:  Nonzee Hanchanachai; Pramote Chumnanpuen; Teerasak E-Kobon
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.605

5.  Comparison of PK/PD Targets and Cutoff Values for Danofloxacin Against Pasteurella multocida and Haemophilus parasuis in Piglets.

Authors:  Yu-Feng Zhou; Zhen Sun; Rui-Ling Wang; Jian-Guo Li; Chao-Yan Niu; Xian-An Li; Yun-Yun Feng; Jian Sun; Ya-Hong Liu; Xiao-Ping Liao
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-02-02

Review 6.  Spatial, Temporal, and Demographic Patterns in the Prevalence of Hemorrhagic Septicemia in 41 Countries in 2005-2019: A Systematic Analysis with Special Focus on the Potential Development of a New-Generation Vaccine.

Authors:  Reyad Almoheer; Mohd Effendy Abd Wahid; Hidayatul Aini Zakaria; Mohd Anuar Bin Jonet; Muhanna Mohammed Al-Shaibani; Adel Al-Gheethi; Siti Nor Khadijah Addis
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-17

7.  Genetic and Phylogenetic Characteristics of Pasteurella multocida Isolates From Different Host Species.

Authors:  Zhong Peng; Wan Liang; Fei Wang; Zhuofei Xu; Zhihao Xie; Zhenghan Lian; Lin Hua; Rui Zhou; Huanchun Chen; Bin Wu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.