Literature DB >> 28077369

The relationship between central visual field sensitivity and macular ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer thickness in glaucoma.

Ji-Woong Lee1,2, Esteban Morales1, Farideh Sharifipour1,3, Navid Amini1, Fei Yu1,4, Abdelmonem A Afifi4, Anne L Coleman1, Joseph Caprioli1, Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi1.   

Abstract

AIMS: To explore the correlation of local macular ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer (GC/IPL) thickness measurements with sensitivity at individual test locations on the central 10-2 visual fields (VFs) in patients with glaucoma.
METHODS: One hundred thirty-seven eyes of 125 patients with spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and 10-2 VFs were included. The exported thickness matrices (200×200) of GC/IPL measurements were centred on the fovea. Total deviation values at each test location were correlated with the 20 000 GC/IPL thickness measurements in the corresponding inferior or superior hemiretina, and areas of highest correlation were plotted. Macular structure-function relationships were also examined between six wedge-shaped GC/IPL sectors and the corresponding VF clusters. A multivariate model was built to identify the 10-2 VF test locations associated with each GC/IPL sector thickness.
RESULTS: Average mean deviation on 10-2 VFs was -9.2±6.1 dB. The 10-2 VF test points demonstrated correlations with GC/IPL thickness in localised arcuate patterns mostly limited within the central 4.8×4.0 mm measurement ellipse (ρ=0.43-0.74, p<0.05 for all). Twenty-one test points of the 10-2 VF were the best predictors of sectoral GC/IPL thickness. Sectoral VF-OCT correlations were high (ρ=0.53-0.66, p<0.001) and did not significantly change after adjusting for retinal GC displacement (p>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Macular OCT/VF relationships have localised arcuate characteristics in the central region of the macula. Given the overlapping nature of structure-function relationships, a smaller number of VF test locations may be used to summarise macular functional damage. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01742819. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Field of vision; Glaucoma; Macula

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28077369     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  15 in total

1.  The assessment of structural changes on optic nerve head and macula in primary open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Kenan Dagdelen; Emrah Dirican
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Longitudinal Macular Structure-Function Relationships in Glaucoma and Their Sources of Variability.

Authors:  Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Nima Fatehi; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 3.  Macular imaging with optical coherence tomography in glaucoma.

Authors:  Vahid Mohammadzadeh; Nima Fatehi; Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Ji Woong Lee; Farideh Sharifipour; Ramin Daneshvar; Joseph Caprioli; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 6.048

4.  Longitudinal Macular Structure-Function Relationships in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Vahid Mohammadzadeh; Alessandro Rabiolo; Qiang Fu; Esteban Morales; Anne L Coleman; Simon K Law; Joseph Caprioli; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Diagnostic Ability of Swept-Source and Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography for Glaucoma.

Authors:  Sang Yeop Lee; Hyoung Won Bae; Gong Je Seong; Chan Yun Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.759

6.  A basis for customising perimetric locations within the macula in glaucoma.

Authors:  Muhammed S Alluwimi; William H Swanson; Victor E Malinovsky; Brett J King
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Comparisons of retinal vessel density and glaucomatous parameters in optical coherence tomography angiography.

Authors:  Zhen Li; Zhike Xu; Qiang Liu; Xiaoli Chen; Linrui Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyzer and Photopic Negative Response of Focal Macular Electroretinograms in the Evaluation of the Relationship Between Macula Structure and Function.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Hirooka; Kenji Yokoyama; Kana Tokumo; Yoshiaki Kiuchi
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-02-26

9.  Estimating Ganglion Cell Complex Rates of Change With Bayesian Hierarchical Models.

Authors:  Vahid Mohammadzadeh; Erica Su; Sepideh Heydar Zadeh; Simon K Law; Anne L Coleman; Joseph Caprioli; Robert E Weiss; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Artificial Intelligence Mapping of Structure to Function in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Eduardo B Mariottoni; Shounak Datta; David Dov; Alessandro A Jammal; Samuel I Berchuck; Ivan M Tavares; Lawrence Carin; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.