Lucas Marcelo Dias Freire1, Giuliana Biasi Gobbi2, Inácio Maria Dal Fabbro3, Fábio Hüsemann Menezes1. 1. Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (FCM-UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil. 2. Fundação Centro Médico de Campinas (CMC), Campinas, SP, Brazil. 3. Faculdade de Engenharia Agrícola da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (FEA- GRI-UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Abstract
Introduction: In the treatment of complex aneurysms, debranching is an extra-anatomical revascularization of visceral arteries followed by endograft coverage of the thoracoabdominal aorta. It eliminates the need for a thoracotomy and aortic clamping, but requires the performance of several technically demanding visceral anastomosis. In 2008, Lachat described visceral revascularization with the use of a sutureless distal anastomosis, performed by the telescoping of an endograft in the visceral branch, named VORTEC (Viabahn Open Revascularization TEChnique). Objective: An experimental model was created to test the feasibility and short term results of performing a telescoped proximal anastomosis to the abdominal aorta. Methods: Swine model. The abdominal aorta was dissected and ligated between the renal arteries and the iliac vessels. Three centimeters bellow the renal arteries a Viabahn endograft was telescoped for 2 cm into the proximal aorta. The other extremity was conventionally anastomosed to the distal aorta. Patency, sealing and tensile strength of the anastomosis were tested. Results: Time for performing the telescoped anastomosis was shorter (5.4±2.8 min versus 10.3±3.4 min, P<0.05). All grafts were patent and both types of anastomosis presented no bleeding. Immediate tensile strength showed a higher strength of the conventional suture (22.7 x 14.3 N, P<0.09). After 30 days there was no pseudo-aneurysms and the strength of the conventional and VORTEC anastomosis were similar (37.3 x 40.8 N, respectively, P=0.17). Conclusion: Telescoped proximal anastomosis by the technique of VORTEC is feasible. After 30 days the tensile strength of the both anastomosis were similar.
Introduction: In the treatment of complex aneurysms, debranching is an extra-anatomical revascularization of visceral arteries followed by endograft coverage of the thoracoabdominal aorta. It eliminates the need for a thoracotomy and aortic clamping, but requires the performance of several technically demanding visceral anastomosis. In 2008, Lachat described visceral revascularization with the use of a sutureless distal anastomosis, performed by the telescoping of an endograft in the visceral branch, named VORTEC (Viabahn Open Revascularization TEChnique). Objective: An experimental model was created to test the feasibility and short term results of performing a telescoped proximal anastomosis to the abdominal aorta. Methods:Swine model. The abdominal aorta was dissected and ligated between the renal arteries and the iliac vessels. Three centimeters bellow the renal arteries a Viabahn endograft was telescoped for 2 cm into the proximal aorta. The other extremity was conventionally anastomosed to the distal aorta. Patency, sealing and tensile strength of the anastomosis were tested. Results: Time for performing the telescoped anastomosis was shorter (5.4±2.8 min versus 10.3±3.4 min, P<0.05). All grafts were patent and both types of anastomosis presented no bleeding. Immediate tensile strength showed a higher strength of the conventional suture (22.7 x 14.3 N, P<0.09). After 30 days there was no pseudo-aneurysms and the strength of the conventional and VORTEC anastomosis were similar (37.3 x 40.8 N, respectively, P=0.17). Conclusion: Telescoped proximal anastomosis by the technique of VORTEC is feasible. After 30 days the tensile strength of the both anastomosis were similar.
Conventional vascular anastomosis requires extensile exposure, circumferential
dissection and temporary occlusion of the vessels. This technique was initially
described by Alexis Carrel, in 1902[[1]], and despite several technical improvements it
has remained basically the same.Several devices for sutureless anastomosis were developed since that time, as grafts
with rings[[2]], connectors[[3]], clips[[4]] and even
magnets[[5]].In complex aortic surgeries, the time to perform an anastomosis is related to
ischemic and reperfusion injuries and can lead to renal failure, mesenteric ischemia
and systemic inflammatory response. Thus, is advisable to simplify and shorten this
period of the surgery.In 2008, Lachat et al.[[6]] described a technique of sutureless anastomosis by
telescoping a stent graft (Viabahn, W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) in
order to facilitate complex vascular reconstruction in debranching procedures for
thoracoabdominal aneurysms. The advantages of this technique are: less dissection of
the vessel, lower the ischemic time and simplification of the procedure.This technique was described solely to distal anastomosis. If also applicable to
proximal anastomosis it could enhance its applicability, as in the case of
laparoscopic aortic anastomosis.The objective of this experiment was to test the Viabahn Open Revascularization
TEChnique (VORTEC) technique in a swine model, by the construction of an
aorto-aortic graft and evaluating the feasibility of the use of the technique in the
proximal position. We evaluated the technical success, the time required to perform
the anastomosis, the gross macroscopic appearance, and the sealing and the tensile
strength of the sutured anastomosis compared to the telescoped anastomosis. The
proximal placement of the telescoped graft will, in theory, submit the anastomosis
to increased hemodynamic stress in relation to the distal position, which could
result in increased rate of migration and leaks. If this model proves successful,
the VORTEC technique could be proposed for a broader range of applications.
METHODS
This study was approved by the Ethical Committee on the Use of Animals of the
Institution (protocol 2737-1). The experiment was carried out on eleven female
large-whitepigs weighting approximately 30 kg. The animals were submitted to
general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation, peripheral venous access and
invasive arterial pressure monitoring. A median laparotomy was performed exposing
the abdominal aorta from the renal arteries to the aortic trifurcation, and the
aorta was ligated midway with 2-0 silk. Above the ligature the aorta was punctured
with an 18G needle, a 0.035" guidewire was passed to the thoracic aorta and an 18F
sheath was introduced 2 cm into the aorta. A 5 mm Viabahn graft was introduced 2 cm
into the aorta according to markings previously placed on the sheath. After
deploying the endograft, the sheath was removed and the graft was clamped close to
its exit from the aortic wall. The distal aorta was transected and a conventional
sutured anastomosis was performed between the endograft and the distal aorta with
running 5-0 polypropylene (Figure 1).
Fig. 1
Completed aorto-aortic bypass. The proximal anastomosis is performed
using the VORTEC technique and the distal anastomosis in a conventional
running polypropylene suture manner.
Completed aorto-aortic bypass. The proximal anastomosis is performed
using the VORTEC technique and the distal anastomosis in a conventional
running polypropylene suture manner.The patency of the graft was tested by the palpation of the distal pulses and testing
with a continuous wave Doppler examination. After completion of the anastomosis,
intra-venous adrenaline was injected in order to raise the arterial blood pressure
above the normal pressure to check for sealing.It was annotated the time to perform each anastomosis, the presence of bleeding
and/or dislodgment of the endograft.The animals were divided into two groups. In Group 1, the animals were sacrificed
immediately after the operation. In Group 2, the animals were sacrificed after
thirty days, meanwhile they were kept at the animal lab's facilities.After the sacrifice, the anatomic specimen containing the abdominal aorta and the
graft was collected for evaluation of a possible displacement of the endograft,
presence of stenosis and pseudoaneurysms. In three animals (one in Group 1 and two
in Group 2) it was performed a tensile strength test of the anastomosis. This test
was done at the Faculty of Agriculture Engineering of the University of Campinas
utilizing a press (Otawa Texture Co.), weight cells (Berg Cell), a signal amplifier
(Kyowa) and the software DAQWARE, according to previous studies performed on the
biomechanics of tendons[[7]].Statistical analysis was performed in the software G-power for the estimation of the
sample size and the software IBM's Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for
the analysis of the Student t test, for the comparison of time and tensile
strength.
RESULTS
The immediate success of the procedure was 100% as the aorto-aortic graft was
completed in all animals. No bleeding was observed from the anastomosis or endograft
displacement after the injection of adrenaline to raise the arterial blood pressure
after the procedure.The time to perform the VORTEC anastomosis was shorter compared to the sutured
anastomosis (5.4±2.8 min versus 10.3±3.4 min,
P<0.05, Figure 2).
Fig. 2
Box plot of “time to complete the anastomosis” in each technique.
This graph represents the distribution of the variable. The box
represents the percentiles 25, 50 and 75, and the square on the middle,
the mean. The x represents percentiles 1 and 99 (minimum and maximum
values).
Box plot of “time to complete the anastomosis” in each technique.This graph represents the distribution of the variable. The box
represents the percentiles 25, 50 and 75, and the square on the middle,
the mean. The x represents percentiles 1 and 99 (minimum and maximum
values).Two animals in Group 2 died on post-operative day one. Necropsy revealed that one
animal died from intestinal rupture secondary to intestinal obstruction. In the
other animal no cause was identified. A patent graft with no signs of anastomotic
rupture was observed in both animals and there was no hemoperitonium.In the remaining four animals, one graft was found occluded secondary to intimal
hyperplasia. The remaining grafts were patent, with no signs of pseudoaneurysms or
graft displacement.The tensile strength test was performed in three animals (Figure 3). On the animal of Group 1 it was found that the
sutured anastomosis had a higher strength [22.7 versus 14.3 Newton
(N), P=0.09], as expected, since the proximal anastomosis was
anchored only by the radial force of the stent graft. On Group 2, two animals were
submitted to the test. It was found no difference between the tensile strength of
the sutured and VORTEC anastomosis (37.3 versus 40.8 N
respectively, P=0.17). The increase in tensile strength was
probably secondary to the intense fibrous tissue that was found around the operation
site (Figure 4).
Fig. 3
Tensile strength of the anastomosis. In Group 1 (tested immediately after
the procedure - objects 1 and 2), there was a bigger difference between
the techniques with a higher strength in the sutured anastomosis. In
Group 2 (tested 30 days after the procedure – objects 3 and 4), was
observed similar tensile strength between the two techniques.
Fig. 4
A: graft appearance immediately after implantation. a: after immediate
sacrifice. Note that in this picture the graft is positioned inversed in
relation to the operative field picture (Group 1). a1: distal sutured
anatomosis prepared for tensile strength test (only sufficient scar
tissue was removed to allow fixation of the graft to the testing arms.
B: graft appearance on post-operative day 30 before explantation. Note
the intense scar tissue around the graft. b: after explantation. Note
that in this picture the graft is positioned inversed in relation to the
operative field picture (Group 2). b1 - proximal telescoped anastomosis
prepared for tensile strength test.
Tensile strength of the anastomosis. In Group 1 (tested immediately after
the procedure - objects 1 and 2), there was a bigger difference between
the techniques with a higher strength in the sutured anastomosis. In
Group 2 (tested 30 days after the procedure – objects 3 and 4), was
observed similar tensile strength between the two techniques.A: graft appearance immediately after implantation. a: after immediate
sacrifice. Note that in this picture the graft is positioned inversed in
relation to the operative field picture (Group 1). a1: distal sutured
anatomosis prepared for tensile strength test (only sufficient scar
tissue was removed to allow fixation of the graft to the testing arms.
B: graft appearance on post-operative day 30 before explantation. Note
the intense scar tissue around the graft. b: after explantation. Note
that in this picture the graft is positioned inversed in relation to the
operative field picture (Group 2). b1 - proximal telescoped anastomosis
prepared for tensile strength test.
DISCUSSION
The VORTEC technique was developed to facilitate the revascularization of the aortic
branches during the correction of complex aneurysms. The main advantages would be
less dissection of the vessels, lower the ischemic time and simplification of the
procedure, decreasing the operative time[[6]]. This technique is being successfully
employed in the treatment of juxta-renal, thoracoabdominal and aortic arch
aneurysms[[8]]. Besides aortic procedures, it has been used in
infra-inguinal revascularization with heavily calcified
arteries[[9]].In 2012, W.L. Gore & Associates launched on the market the endograft Hybrid, a
variation of the Viabahn stent graft, specifically designed to perform this
technique because on one end it is a conventional expanded polytetrafluoroethylene
graft (ePTFE) graft which facilitates the conventional suture. The other extremity
is a stent graft designed for being telescoped into the receptor vessel.In all these studies the purpose of these grafts was to facilitate the distal
anastomosis. This study had the objective to evaluate the performance of this
technique as proximal anastomosis, which could broaden the use of this
technique.It was found that the immediate technical success was 100%, the VORTEC technique was
faster to perform, as expected, since it requires only the puncture of the vessel
under direct visualization, the placement of the sheath and the deployment of the
stent graft. Even though the telescoped anastomosis had a smaller immediate tensile
strength, after 30 days there was no difference between the two techniques. We
believe this is secondary to the formation of fibrous tissue around the anastomosis
as observed in the explanted material.Of course, there are concerns about complications in the long term, such as leakage,
kinking and graft occlusion. However, in the short term, this technique applied in
the proximal anastomosis confection seems to be very promising.
CONCLUSION
This study has demonstrated, in a swine model, the feasibility of performing the
VORTEC anastomosis in a donor, or proximal position. The technique was faster than
the conventional suture technique and after 30 days had a similar tensile strength.
This may open the use of this technique in complex debranching procedures, totally
telescoped grafts and even facilitating the laparoscopic aortic
anastomosis[[10]]. New hybrid devices may be developed for these
applications.
Abbreviations, acronyms &
symbols
EPTFE
= Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft
N
= Newton
VORTEC
= ViaBahn Open Revascularization TEChnique
Authors' roles &
responsibilities
LMDF
Conception and design study; realization of operations
and/or trials; analysis and/or data interpretation; statistical
analysis; manuscript redaction or critical review of its content;
final manuscript approval
GBG
Realization of operations and/or trials; manuscript
redaction or critical review of its content; final manuscript
approval
IMDF
Conception and design study; manuscript redaction or
critical review of its content; final manuscript approval
FHM
Manuscript redaction or critical review of its content;
final manuscript approval
Authors: B Segers; D Horn; J Lemaitre; A Roman; E Stevens; V Van Den Broeck; P Hizette; T Bosschaerts Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: S Nazari; F Luzzana; C Banfi; Z Mourad; S Salvi; A Gaspari; F Nazari-Coerezza Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 1996 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Detlev Erdmann; Ranya Sweis; Christoph Heitmann; Koji Yasui; Kevin C Olbrich; L Scott Levin; A Adam Sharkawy; Bruce Klitzman Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Konstantinos P Donas; Mario Lachat; Zoran Rancic; Christian Oberkofler; Thomas Pfammatter; Ivo Guber; Frank J Veith; Dieter Mayer Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Clark J Zeebregts; Wolff M Kirsch; Jan J van den Dungen; Yong H Zhu; Reinout van Schilfgaarde Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Kushagra Katariya; Said Yassin; Hassan Y Tehrani; Pierluca Lombardi; Saqib Masroor; Tomas A Salerno Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Adenauer Marinho de Oliveira Góes; Edson Yuzur Yasojima; Rosa Helena de Figueiredo Chaves; Flávia Beatriz Araújo de Albuquerque Journal: J Vasc Bras Date: 2019-09-24