| Literature DB >> 28076357 |
Quanchao Zeng1, Rattan Lal2, Yanan Chen1, Shaoshan An1,3.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28076357 PMCID: PMC5226717 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168890
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The descriptions of the sample sites.
| Revegetation ages/(year) | Height/m | Stand density/(tree/ hm2) | Crown area/m2 | Main types of herb species |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 1.31±0.06 | 3500±1.53 | 1.24±0.02 | |
| 20 | 1.54±0.08 | 4500±6.08 | 1.55±0.14 | |
| 30 | 1.59±0.12 | 3300±5.29 | 1.69±0.08 | |
| Natural grassland (NG) | - | - | - |
Fig 1Stoichiometric characteristics of soil C, N and P as affected by soil depth and plantation age.
Values are the means ± SE of three plots. Values designated by different lowercase letters were significantly different among different duration ages, and different capital letters indicated significant difference soil layers, respectively (P < 0.05).
Stoichiometric characteristics of plant and soil C:N:P as affected by plantation age and soil depth.
| Variable | C:N:P | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10-year-old | 20-year-old | 30-year-old | NG | ||
| Leaf | 291:24:1 | 258:23:1 | 247:22:1 | - | |
| Root | 659:31:1 | 530:27:1 | 434:25:1 | - | |
| Soil depth | 0–20 cm | 22:2:1 | 25:3:1 | 28:3:1 | 30:4:1 |
| 20–40 cm | 18:2:1 | 18:2:1 | 19:2:1 | 24:3:1 | |
Fig 2Stoichiometric characteristics of leaf and root C, N and P as affected by plantation age.
Values are the means ± SE of three plots. For each plant issue, means with different letters are significantly different based on ANOVA and Scheffe’s test (P<0.05). Note: Values designated by different lowercase letters were significantly different among different duration ages, and different capital letters indicated significant difference between leaf and root, respectively (P < 0.05).
Fig 3Relationships between soil, leaf and root stoichiometric characteristics of C.korshinskii.