| Literature DB >> 23940793 |
Lei Deng1, Zhou-Ping Shangguan, Sandra Sweeney.
Abstract
The revegetation of abandoned farmland significantly influences soil organic C (SOC) and totalEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23940793 PMCID: PMC3733848 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071923
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Location and DEM model of the Zhifanggou watershed (adapted from Wang et al., 2011).
Figure 2Annual mean temperature (a) and Annual mean precipitation (b) at the study site 1970–2010.
Note: the solid lines in the figures a, b are the dynamic fitting curve for annual mean temperature, annual mean precipitation changes with time.
Dominant species and their biomass, total cover, height at different number of years abandoned.
| Years aban- doned (yr) | Above- ground biomass (g m−2) | Below- ground biomass (g m−2) | Accumulative litter biomass (g m−2) | Coverage (%) | Height (cm) | Dominant species |
| 1 | 169.34±49.67a | 78.92±13.57c | 28.90±4.26c | 8.8±0.58c | 66±6.96ab |
|
| 7 | 73.73±7.96a | 138.73±6.72c | 118.51±14.93bc | 19.4±2.86bc | 41.6±7.88b |
|
| 13 | 100.26±19.01a | 218.71±36.29c | 130.78±33.00bc | 24.4±5.61abc | 68.2±6.01a |
|
| 20 | 210.42±56.73a | 575.21±129.16b | 209.79±35.99ab | 41±10.77ab | 69±5.79a |
|
| 30 | 159.08±12.03a | 1080.34±111.18a | 281.86±25.77a | 48±6.04a | 52±2.07ab |
|
Different letters indicate significant differences at P<0.05 among years abandoned. Values are mean ±SE of 5 sites.
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for soil properties in the seven soil layers among abandoned farmland in different years.
| Soil layer (cm) | Df | SOC | TN | ||
| F | sig. ( | F | sig. ( | ||
| 0–5 | 5 | 10.367 | 0.0001 | 14.557 | 0.0001 |
| 5–10 | 5 | 2.604 | 0.0668 | 3.651 | 0.0217 |
| 10–20 | 5 | 0.88 | 0.4936 | 0.397 | 0.8081 |
| 20–30 | 5 | 5.322 | 0.0044 | 0.132 | 0.9688 |
| 30–50 | 5 | 6.892 | 0.0012 | 3.348 | 0.0298 |
| 50–70 | 5 | 5.787 | 0.0029 | 6.963 | 0.0011 |
| 70–100 | 5 | 2.567 | 0.0697 | 1.825 | 0.1636 |
indicates significant at P<0.05 and
**indicates significant at P<0.01.
Figure 3SOC and TN dynamics for seven soil layers of 0–100 cm following the conversion of farmland to grassland.
Values are in the form of Mean ± SE and the sample size n = 5. Different lower-case letters above the bars mean significant differences in the same soil layers among abandoned land in different years (P<0.05).
Figure 4Dynamics of soil OC and N storages in 0–100 cm soil depth following the conversion of farmland to grassland.
Values are in the form of Mean ± SE and the sample size n = 5. Different lower-case letters above the bars mean significant differences in the same soil layers among abandoned land in different years (P<0.05).
Figure 5Relationship between SOC and TN, soil OC storages and soil N storages, and accumulative soil C storages and soil N storage.
Figure 6Dynamics of soil bulk density in 0–100 cm soil depth following the conversion of farmland to grassland.
Values are in the form of Mean ± SE and the sample size n = 5.
Figure 7Dynamics of belowground biomass in 0–100 cm soil depth following the conversion of farmland to grassland.
Values are in the form of Mean ± SE and the sample size n = 5. It didn't have roots in the 70–100 cm soil layers.