Ji Liu1, Yang Lan1, Ziyi Yu2, Cindy S Y Tan1,3, Richard M Parker2, Chris Abell2, Oren A Scherman1. 1. Melville Laboratory for Polymer Synthesis, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge , Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom. 2. Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge , Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom. 3. Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA , 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia.
Abstract
Microencapsulation is a fundamental concept behind a wide range of daily applications ranging from paints, adhesives, and pesticides to targeted drug delivery, transport of vaccines, and self-healing concretes. The beauty of microfluidics to generate microcapsules arises from the capability of fabricating monodisperse and micrometer-scale droplets, which can lead to microcapsules/particles with fine-tuned control over size, shape, and hierarchical structure, as well as high reproducibility, efficient material usage, and high-throughput manipulation. The introduction of supramolecular chemistry, such as host-guest interactions, endows the resultant microcapsules with stimuli-responsiveness and self-adjusting capabilities, and facilitates hierarchical microstructures with tunable stability and porosity, leading to the maturity of current microencapsulation industry. Supramolecular architectures and materials have attracted immense attention over the past decade, as they open the possibility to obtain a large variety of aesthetically pleasing structures, with myriad applications in biomedicine, energy, sensing, catalysis, and biomimicry, on account of the inherent reversible and adaptive nature of supramolecular interactions. As a subset of supramolecular interactions, host-guest molecular recognition involves the formation of inclusion complexes between two or more moieties, with specific three-dimensional structures and spatial arrangements, in a highly controllable and cooperative manner. Such highly selective, strong yet dynamic interactions could be exploited as an alternative methodology for programmable and controllable engineering of supramolecular architectures and materials, exploiting reversible interactions between complementary components. Through the engineering of molecular structures, assemblies can be readily functionalized based on host-guest interactions, with desirable physicochemical characteristics. In this Account, we summarize the current state of development in the field of monodisperse supramolecular microcapsules, fabricated through the integration of traditional microfluidic techniques and interfacial host-guest chemistry, specifically cucurbit[n]uril (CB[n])-mediated host-guest interactions. Three different strategies, colloidal particle-driven assembly, interfacial condensation-driven assembly and electrostatic interaction-driven assembly, are classified and discussed in detail, presenting the methodology involved in each microcapsule formation process. We highlight the state-of-the-art in design and control over structural complexity with desirable functionality, as well as promising applications, such as cargo delivery stemming from the assembled microcapsules. On account of its dynamic nature, the CB[n]-mediated host-guest complexation has demonstrated efficient response toward various external stimuli such as UV light, pH change, redox chemistry, and competitive guests. Herein, we also demonstrate different microcapsule modalities, which are engineered with CB[n] host-guest chemistry and also can be disrupted with the aid of external stimuli, for triggered release of payloads. In addition to the overview of recent achievements and current limitations of these microcapsules, we finally summarize several perspectives on tunable cargo loading and triggered release, directions, and challenges for this technology, as well as possible strategies for further improvement, which will lead to substainitial progress of host-guest chemistry in supramolecular architectures and materials.
Microencapsulation is a fundamental concept behind a wide range of daily applications ranging from paints, adhesives, and pesticides to targeted drug delivery, transport of vaccines, and self-healing concretes. The beauty of microfluidics to generate microcapsules arises from the capability of fabricating monodisperse and micrometer-scale droplets, which can lead to microcapsules/particles with fine-tuned control over size, shape, and hierarchical structure, as well as high reproducibility, efficient material usage, and high-throughput manipulation. The introduction of supramolecular chemistry, such as host-guest interactions, endows the resultant microcapsules with stimuli-responsiveness and self-adjusting capabilities, and facilitates hierarchical microstructures with tunable stability and porosity, leading to the maturity of current microencapsulation industry. Supramolecular architectures and materials have attracted immense attention over the past decade, as they open the possibility to obtain a large variety of aesthetically pleasing structures, with myriad applications in biomedicine, energy, sensing, catalysis, and biomimicry, on account of the inherent reversible and adaptive nature of supramolecular interactions. As a subset of supramolecular interactions, host-guest molecular recognition involves the formation of inclusion complexes between two or more moieties, with specific three-dimensional structures and spatial arrangements, in a highly controllable and cooperative manner. Such highly selective, strong yet dynamic interactions could be exploited as an alternative methodology for programmable and controllable engineering of supramolecular architectures and materials, exploiting reversible interactions between complementary components. Through the engineering of molecular structures, assemblies can be readily functionalized based on host-guest interactions, with desirable physicochemical characteristics. In this Account, we summarize the current state of development in the field of monodisperse supramolecular microcapsules, fabricated through the integration of traditional microfluidic techniques and interfacial host-guest chemistry, specifically cucurbit[n]uril (CB[n])-mediated host-guest interactions. Three different strategies, colloidal particle-driven assembly, interfacial condensation-driven assembly and electrostatic interaction-driven assembly, are classified and discussed in detail, presenting the methodology involved in each microcapsule formation process. We highlight the state-of-the-art in design and control over structural complexity with desirable functionality, as well as promising applications, such as cargo delivery stemming from the assembled microcapsules. On account of its dynamic nature, the CB[n]-mediated host-guest complexation has demonstrated efficient response toward various external stimuli such as UV light, pH change, redox chemistry, and competitive guests. Herein, we also demonstrate different microcapsule modalities, which are engineered with CB[n] host-guest chemistry and also can be disrupted with the aid of external stimuli, for triggered release of payloads. In addition to the overview of recent achievements and current limitations of these microcapsules, we finally summarize several perspectives on tunable cargo loading and triggered release, directions, and challenges for this technology, as well as possible strategies for further improvement, which will lead to substainitial progress of host-guest chemistry in supramolecular architectures and materials.
The
synthesis and self-assembly of polymer building blocks for
the construction of functional supramolecular micro/nano-structures
are a major part of the emerging field of Supramolecular Polymer
Chemistry.[1,2] The introduction of noncovalent
supramolecular interactions such as hydrogen bonding, host–guest
complexation, or electrostatic interactions offers great opportunities
to impart novel features and functions to these polymer systems.[3] As an example of such self-assembled architectures,
microcapsules have promising applications ranging from drug delivery,
cosmetics, and encapsulation, to microreactors and tissue engineering,
on account of their low effective density, high specific surface area,
and remarkable encapsulation capability.[4−6] Currently, microcapsules
are commonly fabricated in the presence of soft or solid templates
(e.g., droplets, polymer colloids, silica, and calcium carbonate particles).
The encapsulation methods based on bulk emulsion with liquid droplets
as templates are unable to control the shape, size, as well as the
structure of a microcapsule. On the other hand, solid templates, with
desirable morphologies, can be used to generate microcapsules by physical
adsorption, sol–gel chemistry, or layer-by-layer (LbL) techniques,
followed by template removal via calcination or chemical etching.[5] Despite the uniform size achieved, these approaches
typically involve multistep processes, requiring careful examination
of the experimental conditions in each step. Moreover, the presence
of a template might significantly limit the loading capacity of the
resulting microcapsules based on these postloading strategies.[7] Thus, in order to expand the applicability of
such microcapsules, development of facile and effective fabrication
and encapsulation pathways are needed.Since some of the earliest
microcapsules produced from microfluidics
were reported by Weitz and co-workers,[9] intensive studies have enabled the rapid development of microdroplet
techniques for the fabrication of monodisperse capsules on the microscale.[4,5,10] In these cases, encapsulation
is generally achieved by the formation of single or double microdroplet
emulsions, containing synthetic polymers, biopolymers, lipids or amphiphiles,
followed by shell solidification as a result of solvent evaporation,
polymerization or dewetting. Microfluidic techniques have been demonstrated
to overcome challenges inherent to sacrificial template strategies,
such as multiple synthesis steps and limited encapsulation efficiency.[11] Periodic shear of the stream can be induced
by flow-focusing with an immiscible sheath fluid, giving rise to uniformed
microdroplets composed of precursor solutions. Microcapsule skins
are generated upon subsequent solidification at the microdroplet interface.[12] The reliance on covalent cross-linking to give
a stable microcapsule structure could, in some circumstances, impede
on-demand cargo release via structural destruction.[13,14] Introduction of noncovalent interactions, such as supramolecular
host–guest complexation and hydrophobic interactions, can impart
flexibility to control both assembly and disassembly of the microcapsule
motifs.[15] On account of the dynamic binding
and feasibility for building highly organized mesostructures, microcapsules
that are engineered with supramolecular interactions are adaptive,
dynamic, and self-repairing.[16] Since adaptive
dynamics are crucial in biological systems as well for artificial
biomimetic systems,[17,18] such features enable the microcapsules
to be exploited in numerous biomedical applications, including drug
delivery, biomedical diagnostics, living-cell-integrated assays, construction
of artificial organelles, and regenerative biomedicines.[19]
Cucurbit[n]uril-Mediated
Host–Guest Chemistry in Microdroplets
A supramolecular
host–guest inclusion complex, formed via
molecular recognition, involves noncovalent interactions between a
receptor (host molecule) and a guest molecule.[20,21] The host molecules usually possess a hydrophobic or hydrophilic
cavity, which can accommodate guest molecules, such as organic compounds,
metal ions, nanoparticles, and biomacromolecules.[16] Cucurbit[n]urils (CB[n], n = 5–8, 10) are a class of aqueous soluble
macrocyclic hosts with a rigid hydrophobic cavity and two identical
carbonyl-fringed portals.[16,22,23] As stimuli-responsive properties can be inherited from both the
building units and host–guest recognition motifs, this self-assembly
strategy enriches the corresponding supramolecular integrities with
a broad range of responsiveness and features.[17] Similar to other macrocyclic analogues, such as cyclodextrins[20] and pillar[n]arenes,[21] the utility of CB[n] host–guest
conjugation in various supramolecular architectures and functional
materials has been widely investigated. However, as for the microcapsule
motifs, very limited work has been reported in the past few years.
Thus far, through the combination of CB[n] host–guest
interactions and microfluidic techiniques, microcapsules have been
formed by colloidal particle-driven assembly, interfacial condensation-driven
assembly or electrostatic interaction-driven assembly, as discussed
in the following sections.
Colloidal Particles Driven
Assembly of Microcapsules
In a Pickering emulsion, colloidal
particles tend to localize at
the interface between immiscible liquids, such as the water/oil interface,
in order to minimize the interfacial energy of immiscible phases.
Despite this phenomena being discovered more than a century ago, the
effect has only been exploited in the past decade for the fabrication
of stable microcapsules from nano- or micro- particles.[25] By integrating Pickering emulsions and CB[8]
supramolecular host–guest chemistry, Zhang et al.[8] reported a new class of supramolecular microcapsules
fabricated in a single step using a microdroplet-based microfluidic
platform. Microdroplets were first generated in a microfluidic device
using a simple T-junction geometry (Figure a). The oil carrier phase was directed perpendicular
to the aqueous dispersion phase, consisting of three inlets for aqueous
solutions of CB[8], gold nanoparticles functionalized with methylviologen
(MV2+) moieties (Figure a), and a naphthol-functionalzed copolymer (Figure a). The gold nanoparticles directed the supramolecular self-assembly
to the water/oil interface, pulling with them the complementary polymers
for complexation, leading to the formation of a microcapsule shell
(Figure b). Individual
microcapsules were readily isolated after evaporation of the water
droplet, and shown to retain a spherical geometry upon subsequent
rehydration (Figure c). During microcapsule formation, cargo loading (fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran,
FITC-dextran, or Esherichia coli cells) could be
readily accessed in the same step with a high yield (Figure d and e).
Figure 2
Schematic representation of (a) the microdroplet
generation process
using a microfluidic device; and (b) the microcapsule formation process
from the initial droplet stage to the dehydrated stable capsules,
where gold nanoparticles serve to direct the supramolecular self-assembly
at the water/oil interface. (c) Brightfield micrographs of the isolated
microcapsules. Laser scanning confocal microscope images of the microcapsules
containing (d) FITC-dextran; and (e) Esherichia coli cells, respectively. Insets in (d) and (e) display the corresponding
fluorescence intensity profiles (I = intensity; D = distance). Adapted with permission from ref (8). Copyright 2012 AAAS.
Figure 1
(a) Schematic illustration
of supramolecular polymer microcapsules
assembled at the interface of microfluidic droplets. By using a microfluidic
flow-focusing device, an aqueous phase carrying CB[8] and first guest-containing
polymer 1 intersects with another phase consisted of second guest-containing
polymer 2, at a flow-focusing microchannel junctions to form a periodic
flow of oil-in-water microdroplets. (b) Stepwise
formation of a supramolecular heteroternary complexation of CB[8]
and guest 1 (electron deficient, such as methylviologen) and then
guest 2 (electron rich, such as naphthol, azobenzene, benzyl, phenylalanine,
etc.).
(a) Schematic illustration
of supramolecular polymer microcapsules
assembled at the interface of microfluidic droplets. By using a microfluidic
flow-focusing device, an aqueous phase carrying CB[8] and first guest-containing
polymer 1 intersects with another phase consisted of second guest-containing
polymer 2, at a flow-focusing microchannel junctions to form a periodic
flow of oil-in-water microdroplets. (b) Stepwise
formation of a supramolecular heteroternary complexation of CB[8]
and guest 1 (electron deficient, such as methylviologen) and then
guest 2 (electron rich, such as naphthol, azobenzene, benzyl, phenylalanine,
etc.).Schematic representation of (a) the microdroplet
generation process
using a microfluidic device; and (b) the microcapsule formation process
from the initial droplet stage to the dehydrated stable capsules,
where gold nanoparticles serve to direct the supramolecular self-assembly
at the water/oil interface. (c) Brightfield micrographs of the isolated
microcapsules. Laser scanning confocal microscope images of the microcapsules
containing (d) FITC-dextran; and (e) Esherichia coli cells, respectively. Insets in (d) and (e) display the corresponding
fluorescence intensity profiles (I = intensity; D = distance). Adapted with permission from ref (8). Copyright 2012 AAAS.This work represents a facile
protocol for direct construction
of microcapsules, combining the advantages of Pickering emulsion and
supramolecular host–guest chemistry. The ability to form a
colloidal microcapsule is dictated by the ability of colloidal particles
to self-assemble at the interface. Such simultaneous encapsulation
of both the colloidal components and molecular cargo or living cells
during microcapsule generation ensured both high reproducibility and
loading efficiency. Further exploitation based on this Pickering emulsion
strategy includes employing MV2+-functionalized polystyrene
colloids, in order to avoid reliance on metallic nanoparticles while
increasing the mechanical strength and stability of the microcapsules,
leading to prolonged cargo retention.[26,27]
Interfacial Condensation-Driven Assembly of
Microcapsules
Inspired by interfacial reaction, microcapsules
have been fabricated by condensation across the interface of the microfluidic
droplets, involving interfacial polymerization and interfacial molecular
cross-links.[28,29] Zheng and Yu et al.[24] reported the formation of supramolecular microcapsules
via the self-assembly of two polymers bearing different guest moieties
at the interface of aqueous droplets in chloroform, exploiting such
an interfacial condensation strategy within microdroplets (Figure ). In this case,
guest-containing polymers in two incompatible phases were assembled
and disassembled at the microdroplet interface, mediated by noncovalent
interactions (Figure a). Specifically, MV2+ (first guest)-containing hydrophilic
poly(HEMA-co-StMV) (P1) in water and
naphthol (second guest)-containing hydrophobic poly(MMA-co-AA-co-HEMA-co-HEMANP) (P2) in chloroform were brought together at the water/chloroform interface
of a microfluidic droplet, leading to the formation of a supramolecular
polymeric skin, and subsequently robust polymer microcapsules (Figure c and d). Both water-soluble
and oil-soluble polymers can be used for the skins of the microcapsules,
using either oil-in-water or water-in-oil microdroplets as templates.
As a result, this allows for sophisticated control over the hierarchical
structures, properties and functions of the as-formed microcapsules,
such as segregated domains, skin thickness, permeability, and an expanded
tool set for triggered release.
Figure 3
(a) Schematic representation of the microdroplet
generation process
using a microfluidic flow-focusing device and (b) chemical structures
of the CB[8] host molecule, methylviologen (first guest)-containing polymer P1, and naphthol (second guest)-containing polymer P2; (c) fluorescence micrographs of the monodisperse chloroform-in-water microdroplets, demonstrating the interfacial assembly
of P2 (rhodamine tagged, red) within the droplet and P1 (fluorescein tagged, green) present in the external media.
(d) Fluorescence micrographs of the inverted water-in-chloroform microdroplets,
illustrating reversal of P1 and P2 at the
droplet interface. Adapted with permission from ref (24). Copyright 2014 Nature
Publishing Group.
(a) Schematic representation of the microdroplet
generation process
using a microfluidic flow-focusing device and (b) chemical structures
of the CB[8] host molecule, methylviologen (first guest)-containing polymer P1, and naphthol (second guest)-containing polymerP2; (c) fluorescence micrographs of the monodispersechloroform-in-water microdroplets, demonstrating the interfacial assembly
of P2 (rhodamine tagged, red) within the droplet and P1 (fluorescein tagged, green) present in the external media.
(d) Fluorescence micrographs of the inverted water-in-chloroform microdroplets,
illustrating reversal of P1 and P2 at the
droplet interface. Adapted with permission from ref (24). Copyright 2014 Nature
Publishing Group.
Electrostatic
Interaction-Driven Assembly
of Microcapsules
A powerful alternative approach for the
assembly of microcapsules relies on electrostatic interactions to direct
the accumulation of the structural components at the microdroplet
interface.[31−33] For electrostatic self-assembly, charged components
are selectively partitioned at the microdroplet interface by a complementary
charged surfactant. The shell thickness and integrity of the microcapsules
produced in a single step can be sufficient to offer robustness and
improved stability as cargo carriers.Side-group functionalization
of hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC) with anthracene moieties enables dynamic
cross-linking through a 2:1 homoternary complexation with CB[8] molecules
(Figure ).[8]uril host–guest interactions with triggered
and UV-controlled molecular permeability. Chem.
Sci.. 2015 ">30] The electrostatic attractions at the droplet
interface between positively charged anthracene-functionalized HEC
and carboxylate head groups on the surfactants, lead to accumulation
of polymer components at the interface (Figure d). The 2:1 host–guest complexation
of anthracene with CB[8] complexation ultimately results in the formation
of a supramolecular hydrogel skins (Figure g). Even though the biocompatibility of such
anthracene-functionalized HEC-based microcapsules has not been reported,
nevertheless, some investigation into the cytotoxicity of CB[n]-based assemblies has been carried out. In the CB[n]-based colloidal assemblies, cytotoxicity of the MV2+-containing colloids was substantially inhibited, upon formation
of heteroternary complexes containing MV2+, naphthol and
CB[8].[8]uril
complexation. Chem. Commun.. 2012 ">35] Similar findings were also reported
by Rotello and co-workers.[36] Thus, we might
speculate that an anthracene-functionalized HEC system might also
exhibit high biocompatibility, which can be exploited in further studies.
Figure 4
(a) Anthracene-functionalized
hydroxyethyl cellulose and CB[8];
and (b) schematic representation of the formation of homoternary complexes
by accommodating two anthracene moieties in the cavity of CB[8]. (c)
Schematic representation of the microcapsules generation using a charged
surfactant within the carrier phase of oil, while CB[8] and
anthracene functionalized HEC are dispersed in the water phase. (d) Laser-scanning
confocal fluorescence image of microdroplets, confirming that Ant-HEC is localized at the microdroplet interface; (e)
normalized distribution of microdroplet diameters, exhibiting a narrow
size distribution (coefficient of variation 1.5%). (f) Scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) image of dried microcapsules. (g) Brightfield micrographs
of the microcapsule drying process, resulting in a collapsed structure
(scale bars: 20 μm). Adapted with permission from ref (30). Copyright 2015 The Royal
Society of Chemistry.
(a) Anthracene-functionalized
hydroxyethyl cellulose and CB[8];
and (b) schematic representation of the formation of homoternary complexes
by accommodating two anthracene moieties in the cavity of CB[8]. (c)
Schematic representation of the microcapsules generation using a charged
surfactant within the carrier phase of oil, while CB[8] and
anthracene functionalized HEC are dispersed in the water phase. (d) Laser-scanning
confocal fluorescence image of microdroplets, confirming that Ant-HEC is localized at the microdroplet interface; (e)
normalized distribution of microdroplet diameters, exhibiting a narrow
size distribution (coefficient of variation 1.5%). (f) Scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) image of dried microcapsules. (g) Brightfield micrographs
of the microcapsule drying process, resulting in a collapsed structure
(scale bars: 20 μm). Adapted with permission from ref (30). Copyright 2015 The Royal
Society of Chemistry.Yu et al.[34] further developed
a hierarchical capsule assembly process,
in which self-assembled micelles from amphiphilic block copolymers
were immobilized at the interface of microfluidic droplets via electrostatic
and CB[8] host–guest interactions, leading to multicompartmentalized
microcapsules (Figure ). The first step of supramolecular assembly involved micellization
of an amphiphilic poly(methyl methacrylate)-block-poly(acrylic acid) copolymer containing pendantazobenzene moieties
in the hydrophilic block (P1, Figure a). The presence of azobenzene moieties in
the corona of the micelles facilitated complexation via CB[8] to MV2+ moieties pendant from poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone)-co-poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate)-co-poly(MV2+-styrene) (P2), resulting in the formation of
a dynamically cross-linked polymer skin. The microdroplets exhibited
a low polydispersity and the presence of red fluorescence within the
shell of microcapsules confirmed the exclusive localization of Nile
red-loaded micelles at the water/oil interface (Figure c). Evaporation of water from the capsules
resulted in the collapse and distortion of the flexible polymer shell
(Figure d). SEM images
showed the skin of the microcapsule consisting of a composite network
structure of the micelles embedded within the polymer matrix (Figure e). This architecture
draws parallels between biomimetic systems for artificial organelles
and multicompartmental microreactors with partitioned channels.
Figure 5
(a) Schematic
representation of hierarchical assembly of supramolecular
microcapsules from amphiphilic blocks copolymers; and (b) chemical
structures of polymer P1 and polymer P2.
(c) Fluorescence micrographs of microdroplets, illustrating the assembly
of Nile red-loaded P1 micelles at the droplet interface.
(d) Brightfield micrograph and (e) SEM image of dried microcapsules.
Adapted with permission from ref (34). Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
(a) Schematic
representation of hierarchical assembly of supramolecular
microcapsules from amphiphilic blocks copolymers; and (b) chemical
structures of polymerP1 and polymer P2.
(c) Fluorescence micrographs of microdroplets, illustrating the assembly
of Nile red-loaded P1 micelles at the droplet interface.
(d) Brightfield micrograph and (e) SEM image of dried microcapsules.
Adapted with permission from ref (34). Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.Parker et al.[33] exploited electrostatic
interactions between charged supramolecular polymer complexes in microdroplets
and charged surfactants around the microdroplets to selectively assemble
capsule-forming components at the interface, dynamically cross-linked
via CB[8] host–guest interactions. The supramolecular microcapsules
are formed by the electrostatic interactions with a complementarily
charged surfactant at the water/oil interface, which results from
initial accumulation of the charged building blocks as a thin and
diffusive layer at the interface. Once the microcapsule formation
is subjected to water evaporation, the interfacial polymer layer dynamically
flows and reorganizes to decrease the microdroplet surface area, however,
it remains confined to the water/oil interface on account of the supramolecular
CB[8] cross-linking. At a critical point this layer undergoes a phase
change, resulting in a supramolecular polymer film that buckles and
collapses upon further evaporation. As an extension of this electrostatic
approach, the location of orthogonally charged copolymers can also
be independently manipulated within a microdroplet, allowing for selective
assembly at the interface. The controllable assembly offers the advantage
to explore the formation of capsules-in-capsules and opens the prospect
of carrying diverse cargoes for sequential release. Moreover, the
electrostatically directed assembly of small molecules to the interface
of an aqueous microdroplet has also been recently demonstrated by
Groombridge et al., whereby accumulation and subsequent cross-linking
via CB[8] led to the formation of an interfacial supramolecular gel.[37]To better understand the formation of
CB[8]-mediated supramolecular
skins surrounding liquid droplets, Salmon et al.[38] proposed a formation mechanism that can account for a phase
transition upon interfacial compression. The compression-induced phase
change causes the onset of buckling at the microdroplet interface.
Upon water evaporation in microdroplets, the interfacial film increases
in both thickness and density, until it reaches a critical density
and the “buckling transition” happens. This phase change
is a gelation process, which relies on a sufficient cross-link density,
thus, the microcapsule properties can be controlled by tuning the
compressive phase changes.
Cargo Encapsulation
and Triggered Release
Development of microcapsules for cargo
delivery and release is
of utmost importance for applications in the pharmaceutical, agriculture,
food and the cosmetic industry.[4−6,39,40] While a number of reports have demonstrated
that the microfluidic strategy offers a high-throughput method for
microcapsule fabrication, the microdroplet-based supramolecular self-assembly
approach we introduced provides a platform that guarantees an extremely
high encapsulation efficiency under mild conditions and in a single
step.[4,5,41] For microcapsule
systems with permanent cross-linking, release of the payload can only
be achieved through a diffusion mechanism, swelling and/or degradation
of the shell.[42] Fortunately, the introduction
of supramolecular cross-linking motifs not only strengthens the shell
stability, but also bestows the polymer shell with extra benefits
including dynamic adaptability, and thus tunable release kinetics.
Controlled Release of Cargoes
In
comparison to conventional disruptive conditions (pressure or shear
stress) or molecular diffusion, supramolecular CB[n] host–guest interactions make possible a number of elegant
routes to enable triggered release of cargoes. In addition to
manipulation of the initial degree of cross-linking, partial or complete
dissociation of CB[n] host–guest interaction
can be activated by the addition of a reducing agent,[8] competitive guest,[43] or by remote
photoirradiation,[24] subsequently leading
to swelling of the microcapsule shell and increased pore sizes, enabling
release of the cargoes.In a microcapsule system composed of CB[8]-mediated
host–guest cross-linking between MV2+ and azobenzene
moieties,[24] the addition of a reducing
agent, sodium dithionite, can induce the reduction of MV2+ to MV+•, causing the dissociation of heteroternary
complexes (Figure a), activating the release of FITC-dextran cargo (Figure b). Alternatively, the use
of azobenzene moieties imparts the microcapsules with photoresponsiveness.[8]uril host-guest interactions as aqueous
photo-rheological fluids. Polym. Chem.. 2015 ">44] Photoisomerization of azobenzene units prompts
the dissociation of existing heterotenary complexes (Figure c), leading to a remote light-triggered
release in the supramolecular assembly (Figure d). The simple addition of a competitive guest
with a higher affinity for CB[8] molecules is another straightforward
route to trigger cargo release. 1-Adamantylamine, a commonly used
competitive guest (Ka of 1013 M–1),[16] was employed
to competitively disassemble the heterotenary complexes (Figure e) and trigger cargo
release (Figure f
and g).
Figure 6
(a) Schematic representation of preferential formation of the ternary
complexation of two MV+· with CB[8] over the CB[8]·MV2+·naphthol complexes in the presence of a reducing agent.
(b) Fluorescence micrographs of the disintegration process of the
microcapsule wall material in Na2S2O4 solution or H2O over 12 h. (c) Ultraviolet-light-driven
photoisomerization of azobenzene moiety can be used to disassemble
the heteroternary supramolecular complexes between MV2+, azobenzene, and CB[8], resulting in the release of the entrapped
cargo from the microcapsules. (d) Fluorescence micrographs of the
release of the molecular cargo from microcapsules with and without
initial ultraviolet irradiation. (e) Schematic disassembly of the
ternary complexes of MV, azobenzene, and CB[8], in the presence of
competitive guest, 1-adamantylamine. Optical and fluorescent micrographs
of dual cargo-loaded (Nile Red and 500 kDa FITC-dextran) microcapsules
(f) before and (g) after hydration for 3 min in 1-adamantylamine solution
(1 mM). Adapted with permission from ref (24). Copyright 2014 Nature Publishing Group.
(a) Schematic representation of preferential formation of the ternary
complexation of two MV+· with CB[8] over the CB[8]·MV2+·naphthol complexes in the presence of a reducing agent.
(b) Fluorescence micrographs of the disintegration process of the
microcapsule wall material in Na2S2O4 solution or H2O over 12 h. (c) Ultraviolet-light-driven
photoisomerization of azobenzene moiety can be used to disassemble
the heteroternary supramolecular complexes between MV2+, azobenzene, and CB[8], resulting in the release of the entrapped
cargo from the microcapsules. (d) Fluorescence micrographs of the
release of the molecular cargo from microcapsules with and without
initial ultraviolet irradiation. (e) Schematic disassembly of the
ternary complexes of MV, azobenzene, and CB[8], in the presence of
competitive guest, 1-adamantylamine. Optical and fluorescent micrographs
of dual cargo-loaded (Nile Red and 500 kDa FITC-dextran) microcapsules
(f) before and (g) after hydration for 3 min in 1-adamantylamine solution
(1 mM). Adapted with permission from ref (24). Copyright 2014 Nature Publishing Group.
Improved
Cargo Loading Stability
An ideal cargo delivery system would
be expected to encapsulate a
large amount of payload, without premature release during storage
and transportation. Subsequently, triggered release of the cargo should
be readily achieved in a controlled manner upon application of a stimulus.[40] Incorporation of covalent cross-linking, derived
from CB[n] host–guest complexation, can increase
encapsulation stability. It has been reported that the photoinduced
[4 + 4] dimerization of anthracene derivatives facilitated
by CB[8] host molecules at 350 nm was 10 times faster than that of
free anthracene molecules in solution, ascribed to the parallel alignment
of two anthracene moieties within the CB[8] cavity (Figure a).[45] In the case of microcapsules comprising of anthracene-functionalized
HECpolymers, a photoinduced dimerization of anthracene moieties can
convert noncovalent cross-links to covalent cross-links.[8]uril host–guest interactions with triggered
and UV-controlled molecular permeability. Chem.
Sci.. 2015 ">30] An improved encapsulation stability in the microcapsules
was detected post UV-irradiation, demonstrated by a retarded release
of FITC-dextran (250 kDa) compared to the control in the absence of
any UV irradiation (Figure b). Extending the UV irradiation further slows the release
kinetics because of a higher degree of dimerization/cross-linking
up to 120 s irradiation, when complete covalent cross-linking was
achieved (Figure c).
This approach demonstrates the potential of post-treatment modification
to enhance supramolecular microcapsules to a specific release profile.
Figure 7
(a) Schematic
representation of the [4 + 4]-photodimerization
of anthracene derivatives in the CB[8] cavity. (b) Fluorescent micrographs
of the release of FITC-dextran from microcapsules as a function of
UV irradiation time in water over 12 h. (c) FITC-dextran release profiles
from the microcapsules as a function of the UV irradiation time. Adapted
with permission from ref (30). Copyright 2015 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
(a) Schematic
representation of the [4 + 4]-photodimerization
of anthracene derivatives in the CB[8] cavity. (b) Fluorescent micrographs
of the release of FITC-dextran from microcapsules as a function of
UV irradiation time in water over 12 h. (c) FITC-dextran release profiles
from the microcapsules as a function of the UV irradiation time. Adapted
with permission from ref (30). Copyright 2015 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Dual Cargo Loading and
Orthogonal Delivery
Inspired by precisely organized complex
structures in Nature, chemists
and in particular supramolecular chemists, have attempted to mimic
biological structures and produce artificially compartmentalized assemblies,
following a simple prokaryotic model or even eukaryotic level of sophistication.[46,47] The introduction of a specific
molecular recognition motif in the complementary microcapsule wall,
mimicking a biofunctional membrane, might allow for selective permeation
among segregated domains.Double-, triple-, and multiple-emulsion
microfluidic droplets have been developed, such as microcapsule-in-microcapsule
architectures, for selective encapsulation of different cargoes.[48,49] The encapsulation process of such nested microdroplets requires
complicated microfluidic devices, which involve multistage sequential
emulsion generation and precise control over the wettability of each
droplet.[50] In contrast, a dendritic copolymer
is able to entrap a hydrophilic small molecule, such as Congo red,
on account of its unique three-dimensional nanoscale structure (Figure a). By using dendritic
polymers as the construction blocks for the microcapsules, Zheng and
Yu et al. reported the exclusive localization of Congo red within
the microcapsule shell, in the hydrated (Figure b) or dehydrated states (Figure c).[24] In the micelle-based microcapsules. segregated domains are generated
within the microcapsule core and micellar shell. This multicompartmental
hierarchy enabled simultaneous encapsulation of both nonwater-soluble
(Nile red, in the micelle) and water-soluble (FITC-dextran, green,
in the capsule core) cargoes (Figure d–g).[34] This system
benefits from dynamic host–guest interactions, which are able
to synergistically deliver cargoes with triggered release behaviors
through photocontrolled porosity.
Figure 8
(a) Schematic representation of an interfacial
dendritic microcapsule
prepared using a dendritic copolymer as one of the building blocks,
and the preferential localization of hydrophobic oil-soluble Congo
Red (red luminance) within a dendritic microcapsule shell before (b)
and after (c) dehydration. (d) Schematic illustration of a supramolecular
microcapsules assembled from micelles of an amphiphilic blocks copolymer;
(e) fluorescence micrographs of monodisperse microcapsules containing
both water-soluble FITC-dextran cargo (500 kDa, green) in the core
and the hydrophobic Nile Red dye (red) in the microcapsule shell;
(f) brightfield micrographs of dehydrated microcapsules; and (g) fluorescent
micrograph of microcapsules after rehydration, confirming that partitioning
of cargo was retained during after the dehydration/rehydration processes.
Adapted with permission from ref (24), Copyright 2014 Nature Publishing Group; and
ref (34), Copyright
2016 American Chemical Society.
(a) Schematic representation of an interfacial
dendritic microcapsule
prepared using a dendritic copolymer as one of the building blocks,
and the preferential localization of hydrophobic oil-soluble Congo
Red (red luminance) within a dendritic microcapsule shell before (b)
and after (c) dehydration. (d) Schematic illustration of a supramolecular
microcapsules assembled from micelles of an amphiphilic blocks copolymer;
(e) fluorescence micrographs of monodisperse microcapsules containing
both water-soluble FITC-dextran cargo (500 kDa, green) in the core
and the hydrophobic Nile Red dye (red) in the microcapsule shell;
(f) brightfield micrographs of dehydrated microcapsules; and (g) fluorescent
micrograph of microcapsules after rehydration, confirming that partitioning
of cargo was retained during after the dehydration/rehydration processes.
Adapted with permission from ref (24), Copyright 2014 Nature Publishing Group; and
ref (34), Copyright
2016 American Chemical Society.
Challenges, Concluding Remarks, and Future Directions
This Account briefly summarizes recent advancements in monodisperse
microcapsules and microcapsule-based materials, fabricated by the
integrating of microfluidics and CB[n] supramolecular
host–guest chemistry. These microcapsules are attractive for
fundamental studies of supramolecular polymer shell mechanics, leading
to the engineering of sophisticated hierarchical structures and materials
and their applications such as cargo delivery. Additionally, dynamic
host–guest interactions bestow microcapsules with intrinsic
reversibility and adaptability, thus dynamic assembly/disassembly
activated by diverse external stimuli and stimuli-triggered release
of payloads.One limitation of this microfluidic technique is
that it produces
capsules that are tens to hundreds of micrometers in diameter. Therefore,
a big challenge remains in using standard microfluidic devices for
certain applications, which require exceptionally small dimensions
down to the nanoscale. Capillaries with small orifices and manipulation
of high pressure under extremely high throughputs have been demonstrated
to reduce the size of the capsules to nanoscale.[51] Nevertheless, routine preparation of nanoscale capsules
requires future investigation, device design, and process optimization.
An important direction for future work will be expanding the range
of stimuli, which can be incorporated in microcapsule formulations,
featuring quantitative functions and responses that can be activated
in these dynamic assemblies in a well-controlled manner. A future
challenge is to develop a monitoring strategy, which not only controls
the microcapsule integrity, but also tracks in situ cargoes delivery.
Further in vitro and in vivo studies will be indispensable before
CB[n]-based microcapsules are used for any biomedical
applications, as most current studies focus on the methodology of
microcapsule construction and techniques to trigger the
structural destruction with internal or external stimuli, thus release
of the cargoes. Addressing these issues will benefit the design and
fabrication of next-generation supramolecular hierarchical structures
and functional materials.
Authors: Stijn F M van Dongen; Hans-Peter M de Hoog; Ruud J R W Peters; Madhavan Nallani; Roeland J M Nolte; Jan C M van Hest Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Miju Kim; Seon Ju Yeo; Christopher B Highley; Jason A Burdick; Pil J Yoo; Junsang Doh; Daeyeon Lee Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2015-07-21 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Andrew R Salmon; Richard M Parker; Alexander S Groombridge; Armando Maestro; Roger J Coulston; Jonas Hegemann; Jan Kierfeld; Oren A Scherman; Chris Abell Journal: Langmuir Date: 2016-10-12 Impact factor: 3.882
Authors: Richard M Parker; Jing Zhang; Yu Zheng; Roger J Coulston; Clive A Smith; Andrew R Salmon; Ziyi Yu; Oren A Scherman; Chris Abell Journal: Adv Funct Mater Date: 2015-05-26 Impact factor: 18.808
Authors: Ziyi Yu; Yu Zheng; Richard M Parker; Yang Lan; Yuchao Wu; Roger J Coulston; Jing Zhang; Oren A Scherman; Chris Abell Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2016-03-25 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: Yuchao Wu; Darshil U Shah; Chenyan Liu; Ziyi Yu; Ji Liu; Xiaohe Ren; Matthew J Rowland; Chris Abell; Michael H Ramage; Oren A Scherman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-07-10 Impact factor: 11.205