Literature DB >> 28074564

Sustaining SBIRT in the wild: simulating revenues and costs for Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs.

Alexander J Cowell1, William N Dowd1, Michael J Mills1, Jesse M Hinde1, Jeremy W Bray2.   

Abstract

AIMS: To examine the conditions under which Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) programs can be sustained by health insurance payments.
DESIGN: A mathematical model was used to estimate the number of patients needed for revenues to exceed costs.
SETTING: Three medical settings in the United States were examined: in-patient, out-patient and emergency department. Components of SBIRT were delivered by combinations of health-care practitioners (generalists) and behavioral health specialists. PARTICIPANTS: Practitioners in seven SBIRT programs who received grants from the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). MEASUREMENTS: Program costs and revenues were measured using data from grantees. Patient flows were measured from administrative data and adjusted with prevalence and screening estimates from the literature.
FINDINGS: SBIRT can be sustained through health insurance reimbursement in out-patient and emergency department settings in most staffing mixes. To sustain SBIRT in in-patient programs, a patient flow larger than the national average may be needed; if that flow is achieved, the range of screens required to maintain a surplus is narrow. Sensitivity analyses suggest that the results are very sensitive to changes in the proportion of insured patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs in the United States can be sustained by health insurance payments under a variety of staffing models. Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs can be sustained only in an in-patient setting with above-average patient flow (more than 2500 screens). Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs in out-patient and emergency department settings can be sustained with below-average patient flows (fewer than 125 000 out-patient visits and fewer than 27 000 emergency department visits).
© 2017 Society for the Study of Addiction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost; SBIRT; health insurance; revenue; screening and brief intervention; simulation, sustainability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28074564     DOI: 10.1111/add.13650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  8 in total

1.  Costs of screening and brief intervention for illicit drug use in primary care settings.

Authors:  Gary Zarkin; Jeremy Bray; Jesse Hinde; Richard Saitz
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.582

2.  Efficacy of Brief Intervention for Unhealthy Drug Use in Outpatient Medical Care: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ethan Sahker; Yan Luo; Masatsugu Sakata; Rie Toyomoto; Chiyoung Hwang; Kazufumi Yoshida; Norio Watanabe; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 6.473

3.  Cost and cost-effectiveness of computerized vs. in-person motivational interventions in the criminal justice system.

Authors:  Alexander J Cowell; Gary A Zarkin; Brendan J Wedehase; Jennifer Lerch; Scott T Walters; Faye S Taxman
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2018-01-31

4.  Program- and service-level costs of seven screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment programs.

Authors:  Jeremy W Bray; Erin Mallonee; William Dowd; Arnie Aldridge; Alexander J Cowell; Janice Vendetti
Journal:  Subst Abuse Rehabil       Date:  2014-07-01

5.  Variation in brief treatment for substance use disorder: a qualitative investigation of four federally qualified health centers with SBIRT services.

Authors:  Dennis P Watson; Monte D Staton; Michael L Dennis; Christine E Grella; Christy K Scott
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2021-07-14

Review 6.  Implementing SBIRT (Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment) in primary care: lessons learned from a multi-practice evaluation portfolio.

Authors:  Daniel Hargraves; Christopher White; Rachel Frederick; Margaret Cinibulk; Meriden Peters; Ashlee Young; Nancy Elder
Journal:  Public Health Rev       Date:  2017-12-29

7.  Efficacy of brief intervention for drug misuse in primary care facilities: systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Authors:  Ethan Sahker; Masatsugu Sakata; Rie Toyomoto; Chiyoung Hwang; Kazufumi Yoshida; Yan Luo; Norio Watanabe; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Financial sustainability of payment models for office-based opioid treatment in outpatient clinics.

Authors:  Dominic Hodgkin; Constance Horgan; Gavin Bart
Journal:  Addict Sci Clin Pract       Date:  2021-07-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.